Time inconsistent charitable giving
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adena, 2019, Giving once, giving twice: a two-period field experiment on narrow framing in charitable giving, J. Public Econ., 172, 127, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.002
Adena, 2020, Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance, Manage. Sci., 66, 722, 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3232
Ali, 2020, Image versus information, Am. Econ. J.: Microecon., 12, 1
Andreoni, 1989, Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence, J. Polit. Econ., 97, 1447, 10.1086/261662
Andreoni, 1990, Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving, Econ. J., 100, 464, 10.2307/2234133
Andreoni, 2018, The benefits and costs of donor-advised funds, Tax Policy Econ., 32, 1, 10.1086/697137
Andreoni, 2020, When fair Isn’t fair: understanding choice reversals involving social preferences, J. Polit. Econ., 128, 1673, 10.1086/705549
Andreoni, J., Gravert, C., Kuhn, M.A., Saccardo, S., Yang, Y., 2020b. Arbitrage Or Narrow Bracketing? On Using Money to Measure Intertemporal Preferences. NBER working paper 25232.
Andreoni, 2009, Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects, Econometrica, 77, 1607, 10.3982/ECTA7384
Andreoni, 2011, The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism, J. Public Econ., 95, 513, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008
Andreoni, 2017, Avoiding the ask: a field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving, J. Polit. Econ., 125, 625, 10.1086/691703
Andreoni, 2020, The pledging puzzle: how can revokable promises increase charitable giving?, Manage. Sci.
Ariely, 2009, Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 544, 10.1257/aer.99.1.544
Ashraf, 2006, Tying odysseus to the mast: evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines, Quart. J. Econ., 121, 635, 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.635
Augenblick, 2015, Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks, Quart. J. Econ., 130, 1067, 10.1093/qje/qjv020
Bénabou, 2006, Incentives and prosocial behavior, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 1652, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652
Bénabou, 2011, Identity, morals and taboos: Beliefs as Assets, Quart. J. Econ., 126, 805, 10.1093/qje/qjr002
Breman, 2011, Give more tomorrow: Two field experiments on altruism and intertemporal choice, J. Public Econ., 95, 1349, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.004
Carrera, M., Royer, H., Stehr, M., Sydnor, J., Taubinsky, D., 2019. How are Preferences for Commitment Revealed? NBER Working Paper No. 26161.
Craig, 2016, Waiting to give: stated and revealed preferences, Manage. Sci., 63, 3672, 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2504
Damgaard, 2017, Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: Evidence from two natural field experiments, J. Behav. Exp. Econ., 66, 78, 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.013
DellaVigna, 2012, Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving, Quart. J. Econ., 127, 1, 10.1093/qje/qjr050
Dreber, A., Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K., Rand, D.G., 2016. Self-Control, Social Preferences and the Effect of Delayed Payments. Working paper.
Ellingsen, 2012, Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs?, Games Econ. Behav., 76, 117, 10.1016/j.geb.2012.05.007
Ericson, 2019, Intertemporal Choice, Handbook Behav. Econ. Appl. Found. 1, 2, 1, 10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.12.001
Exley, 2017, Observability increases the demand for commitment devices, Manage. Sci., 63, 3262, 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2501
Feltovich, 2002, Too cool for school? Signalling and countersignalling, RAND J. Econ., 630, 10.2307/3087478
Filiz-Ozbay, 2014, Effect of an audience in public goods provision, Exp. Econ., 17, 200, 10.1007/s10683-013-9363-y
Frey, 2009, Social comparison and pro-social behavior: testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 1717, 10.1257/0002828043052187
Giving USA, 2019. Leaving a Legacy: A New Look at Planned Giving Donors. Giving USA Special Report. The Giving Institute.
Grossman, 2015, Self-signaling and social-signaling in giving, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 117, 26, 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.008
Huck, S., Rasul, I., 2010. Transactions costs in charitable giving: evidence from two field experiments, The B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 10 (1) (Advances), Article 31.
Kessler, 2017, Announcements of Support and Public Good Provision, Am. Econ. Rev., 107, 3760, 10.1257/aer.20130711
Kessler, J., Kivimaki, H., Niederle, M., 2016. Generosity Over Time. Unpublished manuscript.
Kreps, 1979, A representation theorem for ”Preference for Flexibility”, Econometrica, 47, 565, 10.2307/1910406
Kovarik, 2009, Giving it now or later: Altruism and discounting, Econ. Lett., 102, 152, 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.12.005
Kolle, F., Wenner, L., 2018. Time-Inconsistent Generosity: Present Bias Across Individual and Social Contexts. Working paper.
Köszegi, 2007, Reference-dependent risk attitudes, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 1047, 10.1257/aer.97.4.1047
Köszegi, 2009, Reference-dependent consumption plans, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 909, 10.1257/aer.99.3.909
List, J.A., Shaikh, A.M., Xu, Y., 2016. Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics. NBER Working Paper 21875.
National Philanthropic Trust, 2019. 2019 Donor-Advised Fund Report.
NPSource, 2019. The Ultimate List Of Charitable Giving Statistics For 2018. From https://nonprofitssource.com/online-giving-statistics/.
Noor, J., Ren, L., 2011. Temptation and Social Preference. Unpublished manuscript.
Rand, 2012, Spontaneous giving and calculated greed, Nature, 489, 427, 10.1038/nature11467
Recalde, 2018, Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games, J. Public Econ., 160, 132, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.02.010
Saito, 2015, Impure altruism and impure selfishness, J. Econ. Theory, 158, 336, 10.1016/j.jet.2015.05.003
Shang, 2009, A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods, Econ. J., 119, 1422, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02267.x
Tonin, 2013, Experimental evidence of self-image concerns as motivation for giving, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 90, 19, 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.011
Young, 2019, Chanelling fisher: randomization tests and the statistical significance of seemingly significant experimental results, Quart. J. Econ., 134, 557, 10.1093/qje/qjy029