Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees

Brain and Cognition - Tập 62 - Trang 30-42 - 2006
Lisa A. Parr1,2, Matthew Heintz2, Unoma Akamagwuna3
1Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
2Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
3Department of Psychology, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA 70125, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bard, 1992, Orientation to social and nonsocial stimuli in neonatal chimpanzees and humans, Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 43, 10.1016/0163-6383(92)90005-Q Bonner, 2004, 7–11 year old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1019, 10.1080/02724980343000657 Bruce, 1982, Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect, Neuropsychologia, 20, 515, 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90025-2 Bruyer, 1992, Expertise in person recognition, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 501, 10.3758/BF03334112 Campbell, 1995, The development of differential use of inner and outer face features in familiar face identification, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 196, 10.1006/jecp.1995.1009 Cassia, 2004, Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ face preference?, Psychological Science, 15, 379, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00688.x Cohen, 2001, Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations?, Infant and Child Development, 10, 83, 10.1002/icd.250 Collishaw, 2000, Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity, Perception, 29, 893, 10.1068/p2949 Collishaw, 2002, Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?, Perception, 31, 287, 10.1068/p3195 Costen, 1994, Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition, Perception, 23, 129, 10.1068/p230129 Diamond, 1977, Developmental changes in the representation of faces, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1022, 10.1016/0022-0965(77)90069-8 Diamond, 1986, Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 115, 107, 10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 Flin, 1985, Development of face recognition: an encoding switch?, British Journal of Psychology, 123, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01936.x Freire, 2001, Face recognition in 4- to 7- year olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information, Journal of Experimental and Child Psychology, 80, 347, 10.1006/jecp.2001.2639 Gauthier, 2000, Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition, Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191, 10.1038/72140 Gauthier, 2001, The development of face expertise, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 219, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00200-2 Goldstein, 1964, Recognition of children’s faces, Child Development, 35, 129 Goren, 1975, Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants, Pediatrics, 56, 544, 10.1542/peds.56.4.544 Harmon, 1973, Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise, Science, 180, 1194, 10.1126/science.180.4091.1194 Le Grand, 2001, Early visual experience and face processing, Nature, 410, 890, 10.1038/35073749 Le Grand, 2004, Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation, Psychological Science, 15, 762, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00753.x Maurer, 2002, The many faces of configural processing, TICS, 6, 255 Mondloch, 1999, Face perception during infancy, Psychological Science, 10, 419, 10.1111/1467-9280.00179 Mondloch, 2002, Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing, Perception, 31, 553, 10.1068/p3339 Mondloch, 2003, Developmental changes in face processing skills, Journal Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 67, 10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00102-4 Mondloch, 2004, Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the differences between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 159, 10.1016/S0022-0965(04)00108-0 Myowa-Yamakoshi, 2003, Preference for human direct gaze in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Cognition, 89, B53, 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00071-4 Nachson, 2002, Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features, Acta Psychologica, 109, 227, 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00058-0 Parr, 1998, Why faces may be special: evidence for the inversion effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 615, 10.1162/089892998563013 Parr, 1998, The perception of facial expressions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Evolution of Communication, 2, 1, 10.1075/eoc.2.1.02par Parr, 1999, Visual kin recognition in chimpanzees, Nature, 399, 647, 10.1038/21345 Parr, 1999, Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face specific?, Animal Cognition, 2, 123, 10.1007/s100710050032 Parr, 2000, Recognizing facial cues: individual recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 47, 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47 Parr, L. A., Heintz, M. (in press). The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotational angle. Perception. Peirce, 2001, Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage, Behavioural Processes, 55, 13, 10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00158-9 Phelps, 1994, Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia), Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 114, 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114 Tarr, 2000, FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise, Nature Neuroscience, 3, 764, 10.1038/77666 Tomonaga, 1993, Superiority of conspecific faces and reduced inversion effect in face perception by a chimpanzee, Folia Primatologica, 61, 110, 10.1159/000156737 Tomonaga, 1994, How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: evidence for an inversion effect in face perception, Primates, 35, 155, 10.1007/BF02382051 Tomonaga, 1999, Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), Primates, 40, 417, 10.1007/BF02557579 Valentine, 1988, Upside-down faces: a review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition, British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02747.x Valentine, 1988, Mental rotation of faces, Memory and Cognition, 16, 556, 10.3758/BF03197057 Valenza, 1996, Face preference at birth, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 892, 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.892 Vermeire, 1998, Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys, Neuropsychologia, 36, 1003, 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00054-2 Want, 2002, Face facts: Is the development of face recognition in middle childhood really so special? Wright, 1996, Monkey and human face perception: inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 278, 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.278 Yin, 1969, Looking at upside-down faces, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141, 10.1037/h0027474 Young, 1987, Configurational information in face perception, Perception, 16, 747, 10.1068/p160747