Three-dimensional assessment of the intervertebral kinematics after Mobi-C total disc replacement at the cervical spine in vivo using the EOS stereoradiography system

SAS Journal - Tập 5 - Trang 63-68 - 2011
Marc-Antoine Rousseau1,2, Sébastien Laporte1, Thierry Dufour3, Jean-Paul Steib4, Jean-Yves Lazennec2, Wafa Skalli1
1Biomechanics Lab, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), unités mixtes de recherche (UMR) 8005, Paris, France
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
3Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital La Source, Orléans, France
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ordway, 1999, Cervical flexion, extension, protrusion, and retraction, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 24, 240, 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00008 Dvorak, 1991, In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine, J Orthop Res, 9, 828, 10.1002/jor.1100090608 Dvorák, 1993, Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 18, 120, 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00018 Lind, 1989, Normal range of motion of the cervical spine, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, 692 Wigfield, 2002, The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27, 2446, 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00006 Goffin, 2003, Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 28, 2673, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA Porchet, 2004, Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: Preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial, Neurosurg Focus, 17, E6, 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.6 Bertagnoli, 2005, Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement, J Neurosurg Spine, 2, 403, 10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0403 Pickett, 2005, Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 1949, 10.1097/01.brs.0000176320.82079.ce Yoon, 2006, Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 148, 943, 10.1007/s00701-006-0805-6 Rousseau, 2008, In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane: Cranial versus caudal geometric center, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33, E6, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e5dce Mimura, 1989, Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine with special reference to the axial rotation, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 14, 1135, 10.1097/00007632-198911000-00001 Panjabi, 2001, Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 26, 2692, 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00012 Penning, 1987, Rotation of the cervical spine, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 12, 732, 10.1097/00007632-198710000-00003 Ishii, 2004, Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, 2826, 10.1097/01.brs.0000147806.31675.6b Dubousset, 2005, A new 2D and 3-D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system [in French], Bull Acad Natl Med, 189, 287 Rousseau, 2007, Reproducibility of measuring the shape and three-dimensional position of cervical vertebrae in upright position using the EOS stereoradiography system, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 2569, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cba2 Dumas, 2004, Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography, Med Eng Phys, 26, 415, 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.004 Champain, 2006, Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies, Eur Spine J, 15, 982, 10.1007/s00586-005-0927-1