Three Worlds of Social Insurance: On the Validity of Esping-Andersen's Welfare Regime Dimensions

British Journal of Political Science - Tập 43 Số 2 - Trang 323-343 - 2013
Robert Jan van der Veen, Wouter van der Brug

Tóm tắt

Esping-Andersen developed a typology of welfare regimes: conservative, liberal and social democratic, which are measured on the basis of seven indicators. We re-examine Esping-Andersen's data as well as replication data compiled by Scruggs and Allan to show that the seven indicators do not form valid measures of these welfare regimes. In addition to divergences in their measurement, the seven indicators are a mixture of institutional characteristics of welfare systems and outcome measures of social stratification. A measurement model based on the five institutional characteristics of welfare regimes that pertain to social insurance, however, does fit both the original and replication data. This article therefore proposes a three-dimensional model of conservative and liberal social insurance, which treats universal insurance coverage as the third dimension, instead of Esping-Andersen's ‘socialist’ regime. Although this does not fundamentally alter the typology of countries, it has implications for previous studies that employ country scores based on Esping-Andersen's method as independent variables in causal models. To illustrate these implications, this article re-examines a study by Noël and Thérien and calls into question their conclusions on the causal connections between the social democratic welfare state and levels of foreign aid.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 72

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 71

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, pp. 85–86

Noël and Thérien, ‘From Domestic to International Justice’, p. 539

Sharma, 1996, Applied Multivariate Techniques

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 60

10.1353/wp.0.0020

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 70

Scruggs and Allan, ‘Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the 21st Century: Revisiting The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, p. 648

Scruggs and Allan, ‘Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the 21st Century: Revisiting The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, p. 653–654

10.1177/000169930104400401

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 75

Esping-Andersen, 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

10.1017/S0020818300033373

10.2307/2586386

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 70

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 78

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 75

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 76

10.1093/soceco/1.1.27

Bollen, 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, 136

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 68

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 71

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 76

Noël and Thérien, ‘From Domestic to International Justice’, p. 540

Noël and Thérien, ‘From Domestic to International Justice’, p. 549

10.1177/0010414002035006001

10.1016/S0195-6310(06)24006-7

10.1177/0952872002012002114

Noël and Thérien, ‘From Domestic to International Justice’, p. 548

10.1093/soceco/1.1.63

10.1177/0032329204269983

Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, p. 75