This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English

Language Sciences - Tập 59 - Trang 192-203 - 2017
James A. Street1
1Department of Humanities, Faculty of Arts, Design and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ammar, 2010, Awareness of L1/L2 differences: does it matter?, Lang. Aware., 19, 129, 10.1080/09658411003746612 Barlow, 2000, 1 Birdsong, 1992, Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition, Language, 68, 706, 10.1353/lan.1992.0035 Birdsong, 2004, Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment, 82 Birdsong, 2006, Age and second language acquisition and processing. A selective overview, Lang. Learn., 56, 9, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x Birdsong, 2001, On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition, J. Mem. Lang., 44, 235, 10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 Bley-Vroman, 1990, The logical problem of foreign language learning, Linguist. Anal., 20, 3 Bley-Vroman, 2009, The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis, Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 31, 175, 10.1017/S0272263109090275 Brandt, 2009, The discourse bases of relativization: an investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses, Cogn. Linguist., 20, 539, 10.1515/COGL.2009.024 Brant, 2011, Learning from social interaction: the form and function of relative clauses in discourse and experimental studies with children Bybee, 2010 Chipere, 1998 Chipere, 2001, Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: implications for first language teaching, Lang. Aware., 10, 107, 10.1080/09658410108667029 Chipere, 2003 Chomsky, 1975 Clahsen, 2006, Grammatical processing in language learners, Appl. Psycholinguist., 27, 3, 10.1017/S0142716406060024 Coppieters, 1987, Competence differences between native and near-native speakers, Language, 63, 544, 10.2307/415005 Crain, 1999 Cunningham, 1998, 1 Dąbrowska, 1997, The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists, Linguistics, 35, 735, 10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.735 Dąbrowska, 2008, The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers' productivity with Polish case inflections: an empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology, J. Mem. Lang., 58, 931, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005 Dąbrowska, 2012, Different speakers, different grammars: individual differences in native language attainment, Linguist. Approaches Bilingualism, 2, 219, 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab Dąbrowska, 2006, Individual differences in language attainment: comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers, Lang. Sci., 28, 604, 10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014 Dąbrowska, 2016 Daneman, 2006, Are there age-related differences in shallow semantic processing of text? Evidence from eye movements, Discourse Processes, 42, 177, 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_5 Daneman, 2007, Shallow semantic processing of text: evidence from eye movements, Lang. Cogn. Processes, 22, 83, 10.1080/01690960500372725 Dussias, 2007, Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading, Acta Psychol., 128, 501, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.004 Ellis, 2005, At the interface: dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge, Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 27, 305, 10.1017/S027226310505014X Felser, 2007, Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: a cross-modal priming study, Second Lang. Res., 23, 10.1177/0267658307071600 Ferreira, 2003, The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences, Cogn. Psychol., 47, 164, 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7 Fox, 1990, A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation, Language, 66, 856, 10.2307/414888 Flege, 1999, Age constraints on second-language acquisition, J. Mem. Lang., 41, 78, 10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 Frenck-Mestre, 1997, Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 50A, 119, 10.1080/027249897392251 Gennari, 2008, Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses, J. Mem. Lang., 58, 161, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004 Indefrey, 1993, The learning of weak noun declension in German: children vs. artificial network models, 575 Johnson, 1989, Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language, Cogn. Psychol., 21, 60, 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 Just, 1992, A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory, Psychol. Rev., 99, 122, 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 Kidd, 2007, Object relatives made easy: a cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses, Lang. Cogn. Processes, 22, 860, 10.1080/01690960601155284 Kidd, 2016, Individual differences in statistical learning predict Children's comprehension of syntax, Child. Dev., 87, 184, 10.1111/cdev.12461 Langacker, 2000, A dynamic usage-based model, 1 Lidz, 2009, Constructions on holiday, Cogn. Linguist., 20, 177, 10.1515/COGL.2009.011 MacDonald, 2002, Reassessing working memory: comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996), Psychol. Rev., 109, 35, 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35 MacDonald, 2006, Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension, 581 MacDonald, 1994, The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution, Psychol. Rev., 101, 676, 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676 Mak, 2006, Animacy in processing relative clauses: the hikers that rocks crush, J. Mem. Lang., 54, 466, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.001 MacWhinney, 1988, The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian, Cognition, 29, 95, 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90034-0 Mak, 2002, The influence of animacy on relative clauses processing, J. Mem. Lang., 47, 50, 10.1006/jmla.2001.2837 Miyamoto, 2003, Subject/object asymmetries in processing of relative clauses in Japanese, 22, 342 Misyak, 2012, Statistical learning and language: an individual differences study, Lang. Learn., 62, 302, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00626.x Misyak, 2010, On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing, Front. Psychol., 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031 Nowak, 2001, Evolution of Universal Grammar, Science, 291, 114, 10.1126/science.291.5501.114 Ojima, 2005, An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: effects of proficiency, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 17, 1212, 10.1162/0898929055002436 Omaki, 2004, Testing and attesting the use of structural information in L2 sentence processing Papadopoulou, 2003, Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: a study of relative clause attachment in Greek, Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., 24, 501, 10.1017/S0272263103000214 Reali, 2007, Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence, J. Mem. Lang., 57, 1, 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014 Roland, 2007, Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: a corpus analysis, J. Mem. Lang., 57, 348, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002 Sanders, 2003, An ERP study of continuous speech processing II. Segmentation, semantics and syntax in nonnative speakers, Cogn. Brain Res., 15, 214, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00194-5 Sasaki, 1997, Individual variation in a Japanese sentence comprehension task: form, functions and strategies, Appl. Linguist., 18, 508, 10.1093/applin/18.4.508 Schmidt, 1990, The role of consciousness in second language learning, Appl. Linguist., 11, 129, 10.1093/applin/11.2.129 Seidenberg, 1985, The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems, Cognition, 19, 1, 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0 Seidenberg, 1997, Language acquisition and use: learning and applying probabilistic constraints, Science, 275, 1599, 10.1126/science.275.5306.1599 Smotczynska, 1985, The acquisition of Polish, 595 Sparks, 2012, Individual differences in L1 achievement impact L2 learning, Linguist. Approaches Bilingualism, 2, 314, 10.1075/lab.2.3.14spa Stanovich, 2000 Street, 2010, More individual differences in language attainment: how much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?, Lingua, 120, 2080, 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004 Street, 2014, Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers' processing of the English passive, Appl. Psycholinguist., 35, 97, 10.1017/S0142716412000367 Traxler, 2002, Processing subject and object relative clauses: evidence from eye movements, J. Mem. Lang., 47, 69, 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836 Trueswell, 1994, Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution, 155 Warren, 2002, The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity, Cognition, 85, 79, 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00087-2 Water, 1996, The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992), Psychol. Rev., 103, 761, 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.761 Wells, 2009, Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension, Cogn. Psychol., 58, 250, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002 Weckerly, 1999, An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences, Psychophysiology, 36, 559, 10.1111/1469-8986.3650559