Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial

Teixeira DNR, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM, Slot DE (2020) Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions among adults: a systematic review. J Dent 95:103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103285 Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H (2013) Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dent (Shiraz) 14:136–145 Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2012) Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 40:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012 Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC (2012) Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 25:153–158 Alex G (2015) Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 36:15–26; quiz 28, 40. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH (2013) Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 41:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 Perdigão J, Loguercio AD (2014) Universal or multi-mode adhesives: why and how? J Adhes Dent 16:193–194. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a31871 Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604 Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV (2012) Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 91:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375 Jacker-Guhr S, Sander J, Luehrs AK (2019) How “universal” is adhesion? Shear bond strength of multi-mode adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 21:87–95. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41974 Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J (2019) Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 107:2121–2131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305 Siqueira FSF, Cardenas AM, Ocampo JB, Hass V, Bandeca MC, Gomes JC, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2018) Bonding performance of universal adhesives to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent 20:121–132. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40300 Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2015) Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine–old wine in new bottles? J Dent 43:525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004 Kaczor K, Gerula-Szymańska A, Smektała T, Safranow K, Lewusz K, Nowicka A (2018) Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 30:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12375 Heintze SD, Rousson V, Mahn E (2015) Bond strength tests of dental adhesive systems and their correlation with clinical results - a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 31:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.011 Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J (2010) Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 26:e100–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO (2015) Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 43:1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009 Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Muñoz MA (2018) Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 69:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011 Matos TP, Gutiérrez MF, Hanzen TA, Malaquias P, de Paula AM, de Souza JJ, Hass V, Fernández E, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2019) 18-month clinical evaluation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Dent 90:103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103219 Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J (2013) A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 25:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12005 Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S (2019) Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 27:e20180358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358 Oz FD, Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Soleimani R, Gurgan S (2019) An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Invest 23:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2571-2 Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 39:113–127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-c Ruschel VC, Shibata S, Stolf SC, Chung Y, Baratieri LN, Heymann HO, Walter R (2018) Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 43:241–249. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-320-c Zanatta RF, Silva TM, Esper M, Bresciani E, Gonçalves S, Caneppele T (2019) Bonding performance of simplified adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions at 2-year follow-up: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 44:476–487. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-049-c de Paris MT, Perdigão J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2020) Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater 36:1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007 Atalay C, Ozgunaltay G, Yazici AR (2020) Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Invest 24:1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03052-2 Perdigão J, Ceballos L, Giráldez I, Baracco B, Fuentes MV (2020) Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 24:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigão J (2015) A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 43:1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2011) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 9:672–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004 Heintze SD, Cavalleri A (2010) Retention loss of class v restorations after artificial aging. J Adhes Dent 12:443–449. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18240 Sugizaki J, Morigami M, Uno S, Yamada T (2007) Clinical evaluation and interfacial morphology observation of Xeno III self-etching resin bonding and restorative system. Dent Mater J 26:602–607. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.602 van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Sörensson E (2007) Clinical bonding of a single-step self-etching adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 2):241–243 Zander-Grande C, Amaral RC, Loguercio AD, Barroso LP, Reis A (2014) Clinical performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively in cervical lesions: 24-month clinical trial. Oper Dent 39:228–238. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-286-c Pocock S (1983) Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Wiley, New Jersey, USA Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 5:323–332 Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM (2001) Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 29:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00050-6 Cvar JF, Ryge G (2005) Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Invest 9:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD (2010) FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Invest 14:349–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8 Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD (2005) An 18-months’ evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 63:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350510019874 Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS (2012) Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Oper Dent 37:3–11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-222-c Ruschel VC, Stolf SC, Shibata S, Chung Y, Boushell LW, Baratieri LN, Walter R (2019) Three-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 32:223–228 Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Barceleiro MO (2016) Six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with a new universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 41:465–480. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-309-c Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B (2014) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review Dental materials 30:1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007 De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30:39–49 Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M and Lapinska B (2019) Multi-layer application of self-etch and universal adhesives and the effect on dentin bond strength. Molecules 24 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24020345 Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR (2005) A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 26:1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.003 Wang Y, Spencer P (2005) Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 84:350–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400411 Van Loghum BS (2014) Xeno Select fact file Tandartspraktijk 35(5):50–51 Lattaa MA (2007) Shear bond strength and physicochemical interactions of XP bond. J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 2):245–248 Maeda T, Yamaguchi K, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Ando S, Miyazaki M (2008) pH changes of self-etching primers mixed with powdered dentine. J Dent 36:606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.009 Zhou L, Wang Y, Yang H, Guo J, Tay FR, Huang C (2015) Effect of chemical interaction on the bonding strengths of self-etching adhesives to deproteinised dentine. J Dent 43:973–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.010 Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L (2010) Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 118:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00769.x Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001 Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28:3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 de Albuquerque EG, Warol F, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Marins SS, Matos T, de Souza JJ, Reis A, de Oliveira BM, Loguercio AD (2020) A new dual-cure universal simplified adhesive: 18-month randomized multicenter clinical trial. Oper Dent 45:E255-e270. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-144-c Marquillier T, Doméjean S, Le Clerc J, Chemla F, Gritsch K, Maurin JC, Millet P, Pérard M, Grosgogeat B, Dursun E (2018) The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: a scoping review. J Dent 68:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.007 Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio AD (2013) Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin-dentin bonds. Oper Dent 38:E1-e25. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-258-LIT Perdigao J, Ceballos L, Giraldez I, Baracco B, Fuentes MV (2019) Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clinical oral investigation 24:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC (2009) Geraldeli S and Loguercio AD (2009) Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. Journal of American dental association 140:877–885. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0281 Loguercio AD, Reis A (2008) Application of a dental adhesive using the self-etch and etch-and-rinse approaches: an 18-month clinical evaluation. Journal of American dental association 139:53–61. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0021 Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Mena-Serrano A, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2015) Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 43:1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.013 Hass V, Matos TP, Parreiras SO, Szesz AL, de Souza JJ, Gutiérrez MF, Reis A and Loguercio AD (2021) An 18-month clinical evaluation of prolonged polymerization of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Dental materials 23:S0109–5641(21)00306–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.012. Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Lisboa AH, Higashi C, Queiroz VA, Rego RO, Reis A (2015) Influence of isolation method of the operative field on gingival damage, patients’ preference, and restoration retention in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 40:581–593. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-089-c van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A (2019) A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 35:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.027