Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action

Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer. Ach, N. (1935). Analyse des Willens. In E. Abderhalden (Ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden (Vol. VI). Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg. Berlyne, D.E. (1949). ‘Interest’ as a psychological concept. British Journal of Psychology, 39, 184-195. Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124-143. Brunswik, E. (1944). Distal focussing of perception. Size constancy in a representative sample of situations. Psychological Monographs, 56, No. 1. Colzato, L.S., van Wouwe, N.C., Lavender, T.J., & Hommel, B. (2006a). Intelligence and cognitive flexibility: Fluid intelligence correlates with feature "unbinding" across perception and action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1043-1048. Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006b). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 705-716. Colzato, L.S., Zech, H., Hommel, B., Verdonschot, R., van den Wildenberg, W., & Hsieh, S. (2012a). Loving-kindness brings loving-kindness: The impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 541-545. Colzato, L.S., de Bruijn, E., & Hommel, B. (2012b). Up to "me" or up to "us"? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:341. Cools, R., & D’Esposito M (2010). Dopaminergic modulation of flexible cognitive control in humans. In: A. Björklund, S. Dunnett, L. Iversen, & S. Iversen (eds.), Dopamine handbook (pp. 249-260). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219-226. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L.S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How 'social' is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2:84. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) Social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1248-1260. Dreisbach, G. & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 343-353. Durstewitz, D., & Seamans, J.K. (2008). The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase genotypes and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 739-749. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240. Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. R. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17, 364-372. Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R.I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22-29. Feldman Barrett, L. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Frings, C., Merz, S., & Hommel, B. (2019). The impact of stimulus uncertainty on attentional control. Cognition, 183, 208-212. Georgopoulos, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 227-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Goschke, T. (2003). Voluntary action and cognitive control from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Hrsg.), Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (49-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., & Mellott, D.S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25. Haazebroek, P., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2017). HiTEC: A connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning. Psychological Research, 81, 1085-1109. Harvey, P. (2012). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge: University Press. Heider, F. (1926/1959). Thing and medium. Psychological Issues, 1959, Monograph 3 (original work published 1926). Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W.H., & Schroder-Heister, P. (1986). Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 271-227. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279. Hommel, B. (1995). S-R compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. Hommel, B. (2000). Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (eds.), Interaction between dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes (pp. 223-244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512-526. Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189-202. Hommel, B. (2015a). The theory of event coding (TEC) as embodied-cognition framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1318. Hommel, B. (2015b). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. In: A.J. Elliot (ed.), Advances in motivation science, Vol. 2 (pp. 33-67). New York: Elsevier. Hommel, B. (2016). Embodied cognition according to TEC. In: Y. Coello & M. Fischer (eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition, Volume 1: Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 75-92). Psychology Press. Hommel, B. (2018). Representing oneself and others: An event-coding approach. Experimental Psychology, 65, 323-331. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L.S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition, 17, 120-140. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L.S. (2015). Interpersonal trust: An event-based account. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1399. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L.S. (2017a). The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 43-58. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L.S. (2017b). Meditation and metacontrol. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1, 115-121. Hommel, B., & Wiers, R.W. (2017). Towards a unitary approach to human action control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 940-949. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001a). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001b). Codes and their vicissitudes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 910-937. Hommel, B., Proctor, R.W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. Hommel, B., Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Feature integration across the lifespan: Stickier stimulus-response bindings in children and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:268. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205. Kachergis, G., Wyatte, D., O'Reilly, R.C., de Kleijn, R., & Hommel, B. (2014). A continuous time neural model for sequential action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369, 20130623. Kahnemann, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B.J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219. Kalaska, J. F., & Hyde, M. L. (1985). Area 4 and area 5: Differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 197-202. Keizer, A.W., Verschoor, M., Verment, R., & Hommel, B. (2010a). The effect of gamma enhancing neurofeedback on measures of feature-binding flexibility and intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 25-32. Keizer, A.W., Verment, R., & Hommel, B. (2010b). Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval. Neuroimage, 49, 3404-3413. Kilner, J., Hommel, B., Bar, M., Barsalou, L.W., Friston, K.J., Jost, J., Maye, A., Metzinger, T., Pulvermüller, F., Sánchez-Fibla, M., Tsotsos, J.K., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). Action-oriented models of cognitive processing: A little less cogitation, a little more action please. In: A.K. Engel, K.J. Friston & D. Kragic (eds.), The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science, (pp. 159-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kim, D., & Hommel, B. (2015). An event-based account of conformity. Psychological Science, 26, 484-489. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 99–104. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-170. Kühn, S., Keizer, A., Colzato, L.S., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., & Hommel, B. (2011a). The neural underpinnings of event-file management: Evidence for stimulus-induced activation of, and competition among stimulus-response bindings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 896-904. Kühn, S., Keizer, A., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., & Hommel, B. (2011b). The functional and neural mechanism of action preparation: Roles of EBA and FFA in voluntary action control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 214-220. Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492–499. Logan, D.L. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527. Loveless, N.E. (1962). Direction-of-motion stereotypes: A review. Ergonomics, 5, 357-383. Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 163–169. Mekern, V.N., Sjoerds, Z., & Hommel, B. (2019). How metacontrol biases and adaptivity impact performance in cognitive search tasks. Cognition, 182, 251-259. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249-259. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872. O’Reilly, R.C., Bhattacharyya, R., Howard, M.D., & Ketz, N. (2014). Complementary learning systems. Cognitive Science, 38, 1229-1248. Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F. & Friston, K. (2018). Hierarchical active inference: A theory of motivated control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 294-306. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20. Saenz, M., & Langers, D.R.M. (2014). Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research, 307, 42-52. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G.., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others‘ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88, B11-B21. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304. Sokolov, E.N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Spapé, M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1117-1121. Sternberg, S. (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. Stock, A. & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176-188. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & Performance XIX (pp. 538-552). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178. Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I.P.L., & Chambers, C.D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behavior change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 497-524. Verschoor, S.A., & Hommel, B. (2017). Self-by-doing: The role of action for self-acquisition. Social Cognition, 35, 127-145. Von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: The modeler's perspective. Neuron, 24, 95-104. Wallace, R. A. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360. Yamaguchi, M., Wall, H.J., & Hommel, B. (2018). Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task. Psychological Research, 82, 385-394. Zmigrod, S., de Sonneville, L.M.J., Colzato, L.S., Swaab, H. & Hommel, B. (2013). Cognitive control of feature bindings: Evidence from children with autistic spectrum disorder. Psychological Research, 77, 147-154.