Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain

Freshwater Biology - Tập 31 Số 3 - Trang 487-505 - 1994
Gudrun Bornette1, Christophe Henry1, MARIE‐HÉLÈNE BARRAT1, Claude Amoros1
1URA CNRS 1451 ‘Ecologie des Eaux Douces et des Grands Fleuves’, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

Tóm tắt

SUMMARY The objective of this study, which is based on forty‐two species of hydrophytes and helophytes, is to investigate: (i) relationships among species traits; (ii) habitat utilization by species; (iii) the relationship between species traits and habitat utilization; (iv) trends in species traits in the framework of spatial–temporal habitat variability, and if trends match predictions from the river habitat templet; and (v) trends in species richness in the framework of spatial–temporal habitat variability, and if trends match predictions of the patch dynamics concept. Two data sets were used for this analysis: species traits (mainly reproductive and morphological characteristics) were documented from the literature; and species distribution across eight habitat types was from field surveys conducted in the floodplain of the Upper Rhone River, France. This information was structured by a fuzzy coding technique and analysed by ordination methods. Several species traits, which are related to disturbances and reflect resistance (e.g. attachment to soil or substrate) or resilience (e.g. potential for regeneration of an individual), are closely related for aquatic macrophytes. Habitat utilization by aquatic macrophytes separates the habitat types along a gradient of connectivity with the main channel, which corresponds to a gradient in flood disturbance frequency and the permanence of the different water‐bodies. The relationship between species traits and habitat utilization is highly significant, indicating that a particular set of habitat types is used by taxa with a particular set of species trait modalities. Observations in one habitat templet (in which scaling of the templet is primarily based on water level fluctuations for the temporal variability axis and on substrate characteristics for the spatial variability axis) generally do not support predictions on trends in species traits but do support predictions on trends in species richness. Observations in an alternative habitat templet (in which scaling of the templet is based on frequency of flood scouring for the temporal variability axis and on heterogeneity of the substrate for the spatial variability axis) support theoretical predictions on trends for about half of the species traits for which predictions were available. However, trends in species richness in this alternative habitat templet are only partly in agreement with predictions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/rrr.3450010104

Arber A., 1920, Water Plants. A Study of Aquatic Angiosperms, 436, 10.5962/bhl.title.17150

Balocco‐CastellaC.(1988)Les macrophytes aquatiques des milieux abandonnés par le Haut‐Rhône et l'Aiu: diagnostic phyto‐écologique sur l'évolution et le fonctionnement de ces écosystèmes.Thesis Université Lyon I 150pp.

10.1007/BF00023347

BornetteG.(1993)Analyse synchronique et diachronique du fonctionnement des anciens chenaux tressés du Rhône: effet des perturbations hydrauliques sur la dynamique de la végétation aquatique.Thesis Université Lyon I 157pp.

10.2307/3236032

10.2307/3236124

Brock T.C.M., 1987, The effects of extreme water level fluctuations on the wetland vegetation of a nymphaeid‐dominated oxbow lake in The Netherlands, Archiv für Hydrabiologie Ergebnisse der Limnologie, 27, 57

10.1007/BF00045135

10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01743.x

10.1007/BF02854662

10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01742.x

10.1126/science.199.4335.1302

10.1016/B978-0-12-554520-4.50022-8

10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01741.x

10.1038/242344a0

Crime J.P., 1974, Vegetation classification by reference to strategies, Nature, 250, 26, 10.1038/250026a0

Grime J.P., 1979, Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, 222

Haslam S.M., 1978, River Plants, 396

Haslam S.M., 1987, River Plants of Western Europe. The Macrophytic Vegetation of Watercourses of the European Economic Community, 512

Haslam S.M., 1975, British water plants, Field Studies, 4, 243

10.1086/283366

Kadono Y., 1984, Comparative ecology of Japanese Potamogeton: an extensive survey with special reference to growth form and life cycle, Japanese Journal of Ecology, 34, 161

10.2307/3565672

10.2307/3235676

10.2307/3545125

10.1016/S0380-1330(86)71697-3

Kohler A., 1974, Verbreitung und Indikatorwert der submersen Makrophyten in den Flieβgewässern der Friedberger Au, Bericht der Bayerischen botanischen Gesellschaft zur Erforschung der heimischen Flora, 45, 5

10.1007/BF00016661

Lejmbach B., 1977, The influence of flowing water velocity on the structure of underwater phytocenosis, Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica, 22, 355

10.1073/pnas.71.7.2744

10.2307/2422694

10.1016/0304-3770(91)90043-5

10.1007/BF00045931

Petit F., 1985, L'utilisation des plantes aquatiques comme indicateur du type d'activité géomorphologique d'une riviàre ardennaise, Colloques Phytosociologiques, 13, 691

Sculthorpe C.D., 1967, The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants, 610

10.1007/BF00031680

10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01739.x

10.2307/1467400

10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x

10.1007/BF00045745

10.2307/1937737

White P.S., 1985, The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, 3

10.2307/3235675