Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning

Educational Research Review - Tập 6 - Trang 169-184 - 2011
Raija Hämäläinen1, Katja Vähäsantanen2
1Finnish Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, Keskussairaalantie 2, FIN-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
2Department of Educational Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (Viveca 483), FIN-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Altheide, 1987, Ethnographic content analysis, Qualitative Sociology, 10, 65, 10.1007/BF00988269 Amabile, 1983 Amabile, 1997, Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do, California Management Review, 40, 39, 10.2307/41165921 Ambrose, 2005, Creativity in teaching: Essential knowledge, skills and dispositions, 281 Andiliou, 2010, Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research, Educational Research Review, 5, 201, 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003 Andriessen, 2006, Arguing to learn, 443 Aronson, 1978 Arvaja, 2007, Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 133, 10.1007/s11412-007-9013-5 Arvaja, M. (2011). Analyzing the contextual nature of collaborative activity. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens, & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues (pp. 25–46). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, Vol. 12. New York: Springer. Arvaja, 2000, Collaborative processes during report writing of a science learning project: The nature of discourse as a function of task requirements, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 455, 10.1007/BF03172987 Arvaja, 2008, Collaborative learning and computer-supported collaborative learning environments, 267 Arvaja, 2009, Challenges for the teacher’s role in promoting productive knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning contexts, 263 Arvaja, 2007, Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context, Learning and Instruction, 17, 448, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.003 Attride-Stirling, 2001, Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research, Qualitative Research, 1, 385, 10.1177/146879410100100307 Azmitia, 1996, Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues, 133 Baker, M. (2002). Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving. In P. Salembier, & H. Benchekroun (Eds.), Cooperation and complexity (pp. 587–620). Socio-technical Systems, Vol. 16. Paris: Hermès. Baker, 2003, Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions, 1 Baker, 2010 Barnes, 1995 Barron, 2000, Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403, 10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2 Barron, 2003, When smart groups fail, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 Barron, 1999, All creation is collaboration, 49 Barron, 1981, Creativity, intelligence and personality, Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439, 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255 Beghetto, 2007, Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity, Psychology of the Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 1, 73, 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73 Bereiter, 2002 Bielaczyc, 2006, Fostering knowledge-creating communities, 37 Billett, 2006 Billett, 2008, The workplace as learning environment: Introduction, International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 209, 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.07.002 Bluemink, 2010, Group-level analysis on multiplayer-game collaboration: How do the individuals shape the group interaction?, Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 18, 365, 10.1080/10494820802602444 Boden, 1990 Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brown, 1992, Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141, 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 Brown, 1994, Guided discovery in a community of learners, 227 Bruffee, 1999 Chin, 2002, Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science, International Journal of Science Education, 24, 521, 10.1080/09500690110095249 Cobb, 1996, Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research, Educational Psychologist, 31, 175, 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265 Cohen, 1994, Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups, Review of Educational Research, 64, 1, 10.3102/00346543064001001 Collin, 2010, Promoting inter-professional teamwork and learning–the case of a surgical operating theatre, Journal of Education and Work, 23, 43, 10.1080/13639080903495160 Cropley, 1997, Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles, Vol. 1, 83 Csikszentmihalyi, 1988, Society, culture and person: A systems view of creativity, 325 Csikszentmihalyi, 1990 Craft, 2003, Creative thinking in early years of education, Early years, 23, 143, 10.1080/09575140303105 Craft, 2005 Craft, 2008, Studying collaborative creativity: Implications for education, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 241, 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.006 Craft, 2007, Teacher stance in creative learning: A study of progression, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 136, 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.09.003 2001 Crook, 1994 Crook, 1998, Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning, Computers and Education, 30, 237, 10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00067-5 Davis, 2004, Explorations of scaffolding in complex systems, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 265, 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1 Day, 2002, School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity, International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 677, 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00065-X De Corte, 1996, Toward the integration of computers in powerful learning environments, 79 De Dreu, 2001, Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making, Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 1191, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191 De Laat, 2004, It’s not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 165, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00085.x De Wever, 2006, Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review, Computers and Education, 46, 6, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 De Wever, 2010, Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors, Learning and Instruction, 20, 349, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.03.001 Dillenbourg, 1999, What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’?, 1 Dillenbourg, 2002, Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design, 61 Dillenbourg, 2006, The solo/duo gap, Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 155, 10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.001 Dillenbourg, 2009, The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration, 3 Dillenbourg, 2007, Designing integrative scripts, 275, 10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_16 Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525–552). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. Dillenbourg, 2007, Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00191.x Doise, 1986, Individual and collective conflicts of centrations in cognitive development, European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 105, 10.1002/ejsp.2420090110 Eteläpelto, 2008, The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in long-term learning community, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 226, 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.003 Faulkner, 2000, The mediating effect of task presentation on collaboration and children’s acquisition of scientific reasoning, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 418, 10.1007/BF03172985 Feldhusen, 1972, Freedom and play: Catalysts for creativity, Elementary School Journal, 73, 149, 10.1086/460748 Fischer, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2006, April). Challenges of orchestrating computer-supported collaborative learning. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA. Fleith, 2000, Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment, Roeper Review, 22, 148, 10.1080/02783190009554022 Florida, 2002 Gall, 2008, Music and eJay: An opportunity for creative collaborations in the classroom, International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 27, 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.008 Gee, 1998, Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice. A methodological study, Review of Educational Research, 23, 119 Glăveanu, 2010, Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology, New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79, 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007 Grossen, 2008, Methods for studying collaborative creativity: An original and adventurous blend, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 246, 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.005 Guilford, 1950, Creativity, The American Psychologist, 5, 444, 10.1037/h0063487 Hämäläinen, 2008, Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning, Computers and Education, 50, 98, 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.001 Hämäläinen, 2011, Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: A design-based study, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 45, 10.1080/1475939X.2011.554010 Hämäläinen, 2009, Scripted collaboration and group-based variations in a higher education CSCL context, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 1, 10.1080/00313830802628281 Hämäläinen, 2010, Teachers’ instructional planning for computer-supported collaborative learning: Macro-scripts as a pedagogical method to facilitate collaborative learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 871, 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.025 Hämäläinen, 2008, Designing and analyzing collaboration in a scripted game for vocational education, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2496, 10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.010 Hamilton, 1997, Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 299, 10.1006/ceps.1997.0935 Hargreaves, 2000, Four ages of professionalism and professional learning, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 151, 10.1080/713698714 Hewitt, 2008, Children’s creative collaboration during a computer-based music task, International Journal of Education, 47, 11, 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.003 Hmelo-Silver, 2008, Facilitating collaborative knowledge building, Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48, 10.1080/07370000701798495 Hodkinson, 2003, Individuals, communities of practice and the policy context: School teachers’ learning in their workplace, Studies in Continuing Education, 25, 3, 10.1080/01580370309284 Hökkä, 2008, Teacher educators’ workplace learning. The interdependency between individual agency and social context, 51 Järvenoja, 2009, Emotion control in collaborative learning situations – Do students regulate emotions evoked from social challenges?, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463, 10.1348/000709909X402811 Jeong, 2010, Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 84, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.001 John-Steiner, 2000 Jordan, 1995, Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39, 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2 Kampylis, 2009, In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 15, 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001 Kelly, 2001, Common task and uncommon knowledge: Dissenting voices in the discursive construction of physics across small laboratory groups, Linguistics and Education, 12, 135, 10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00046-2 Kirpal, 2004, Researching work identities in a European context, Career Development International, 9, 199, 10.1108/13620430410535823 Kneser, 2001, Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: Observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success, Learning and Instruction, 11, 53, 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00015-3 Kobbe, 2007, Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211, 10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4 Kollar, 2010, Turning the classroom of the future into the classroom of the present, 245 Kollar, 2006, Collaboration scripts: A conceptual analysis, Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159, 10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2 Kollar, 2008, Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning, Learning and Instruction, 17, 708, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021 Kollar, I., Hämäläinen, R., Evans, M., De Wever, B., & Perrotta, C. (2011). Orchestrating CSCL – More than a metaphor? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings. Volume II (pp. 946-947). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Koschmann, 1996 Krange, 2008, What does it mean? Students’ procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 3, 25, 10.1007/s11412-007-9030-4 Kumpulainen, 2000, Mapping the dynamics of peer group interaction: A method of analysis of socially shared learning processes, 144 Lahti, 2004, Conflict as a challenge to productive learning during long-term collaboration, 145 Lasky, 2005, A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899, 10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003 Laurillard, 2009, The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 5, 10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2 Lazonder, 2003, Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments, Computers and Education, 41, 291, 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00050-2 Leitão, 2000, The potential of argument in knowledge building, Human Development, 43, 332, 10.1159/000022695 Littleton, 1999, Learning together: Understanding the processes of computer-based collaborative learning, 20 Littleton, 2005, The negotiation and co-construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community, Learning, Media and Technology, 30, 147, 10.1080/17439880500093612 MacDonald, 2000, Creativity and music education: The impact of social variables, International Journal of Music Education, 36, 58, 10.1177/025576140003600107 Marttunen, 2005, Argumentation skills as prerequisites for collaborative learning among Finnish, French and English secondary school students, Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 365, 10.1080/13803610500110588 Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7 Mercer, 2010, The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1, 10.1348/000709909X479853 Mercer, 2004, Reasoning as scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science, British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359, 10.1080/01411920410001689689 Mercer, 2010, Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19, 195, 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491230 Mercer, 2007 Meyer, 2002, From ‘loose coupling’ to ‘tight management’? Making sense of the changing landscape in management and organization theory, Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 515, 10.1108/09578230210454992 Miell, 2004 Miell, 2008, Musical collaboration outside school: Processes of negotiation in band rehearsals, International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 41, 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.006 Moran, 2010, Creativity in school, 319 Moran, 2003, Creativity in the making, 61 Moran, 2004, How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation, 11 Newman, 1989 Nijstad, 2003, Group creativity: Common themes and future direction, 326 Palincsar, 1984, Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117, 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 Paulus, 2003 Pea, 1993, Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education, 47 Pea, 1994, Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 285, 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_4 Pea, 2004, The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423, 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6 Piaget, 1926 Piaget, 1980 Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of cognitive structures. University of Chicago Press. Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity (Revised edition of Understanding those who create, 2nd ed., 1998). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press. Puntambekar, 2003, Moving toward a theory of CSCL, 503 Qin, 1995, Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving, Review of Educational Research, 65, 129, 10.3102/00346543065002129 Reiser, 2004, Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273, 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 Rejskind, 2000, TAG teachers: Only the creative need apply, Roeper Review, 22, 153, 10.1080/02783190009554023 Resnick, 1993, Reasoning in conversation, Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347, 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649029 Reusser, 2001, Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice, 2058 Rojas-Drummond, 2006, Explicit reasoning, creativity and co-construction in primary school children’s collaborative activities, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 84, 10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001 Roschelle, 1992, Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235, 10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1 Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). NATO ASO Series F: Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 128. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Ruiz-Primo, 2011, Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning, Science, 331, 1269, 10.1126/science.1198976 Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Figueroa, M., & Gluckman, M. (2011). Testing a premise of inquiry based science instruction: Exploring small group processes and its link to student learning. Paper presented at the AERA meeting, April 2011. Sandoval, 2003, Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2 Sandoval, 2004, Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry, Science Education, 88, 345, 10.1002/sce.10130 Sarmiento, 2008, Group creativity in inter-action: Referencing, remembering and bridging, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (IJHCI), 24, 492, 10.1080/10447310802142300 Sawyer, 2003 Sawyer, 2004, Creative Teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation, Educational Researcher, 33, 12, 10.3102/0013189X033002012 Sawyer, 2006, Educating for innovation, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 41, 10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001 Sawyer, 2006 Sawyer, 2007 Sawyer, 2004, Study group discourse: How external representations affect collaborative conversation, Linguistics and Education, 15, 387, 10.1016/j.linged.2005.03.002 Sawyer, 2009, Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration, Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 81, 10.1037/a0013282 Scardamalia, 1991, Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37, 10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3 Scardamalia, 1994, Computer support for knowledge-building communities, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265, 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3 Scardamalia, 2006, Knowledge building, 97 Schellens, 2007, Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 225, 10.1007/s11412-007-9016-2 Shalley, 2004, What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity, The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 Silva, E. (2008). Measuring skills for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Education Sector. Retrieved January 18, 2011 from http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=716323. Springer, 1999, Effects of small-group learning on undergraduate in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 69, 21, 10.3102/00346543069001021 Stahl, G. (2003). Communication and learning in online collaboration. Paper presented at GROUP_03, Sannibel Island, Florida. Retrieved November 9, 2010, from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/publications/conferences/2003/group/group03.doc. Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, Vol. 3: What we know about CSCL… and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved 29.6.2011. <http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/mit/>. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 406–427). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved May 30, 2011 from <http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf>. Stegmann, 2007, Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421, 10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y Sternberg, 1999, The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms, 3 Sternberg, 1996 Stone, 1993, What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding?, 169 Strijbos, 2010, Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 495, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.014 Suthers, 2005, Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL, 662 Tardif, 1988, What do we know about creativity?, 429 Torrance, 1965 Troman, 2007, Creativity and performativity policies in primary school cultures, Journal of Education Policy, 22, 549, 10.1080/02680930701541741 Vähäsantanen, 2009 Vähäsantanen, 2008, Negotiating professional identity: Vocational teachers’ personal strategies in a reform context, 35 Vähäsantanen, K. & Eteläpelto, A. Agency within career pathway transitions: Processes of disengagement from the work organisations. Studies in Continuing Education (submitted for publication). Vähäsantanen, 2008, Teachers’ professional identity negotiations in two different work organisations, Vocations and learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education, 1, 131, 10.1007/s12186-008-9008-z Valleala, U., Arvaja, M., & Hämäläinen, R. (2010). Towards research based online collaborative learning. In L. Chova, D. Belenguer, & I. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of EDULEARN 10 Conference, July 5–7, Barcelona, Spain, (pp. 5276–5285) Valencia, Spain: International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED). Van Boxtel, 2000, Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge, Learning and Instruction, 10, 311, 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5 Vass, E., & Littleton, K. (2009). Analysing role distribution in children’s computer-mediated collaborative creative writing. In K. Kumpulainen, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 99–120). Rotterdam: Sense. Voogt, 2008, IT and curriculum processes: Dilemmas and challenges, 117 Vygotsky, 1978 Webb, 1984, Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33, 10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.33 Webb, 1989, Peer interaction and learning in small groups, International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21, 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 Webb, 1996, Group processes in the classroom, 841 Webb, 1986, Problem-solving strategies and group processes in small groups learning computer programming, American Educational Research Journal, 23, 243, 10.3102/00028312023002243 Wegerif, 2005, Reason and creativity in classroom dialogues, Language and Education, 19, 223, 10.1080/09500780508668676 Weinberger, 2005, Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning, Instructional Science, 33, 1, 10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4 Wells, 2006, Dialogue in the classroom, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379, 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3 Wells, 2002, Introduction: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education, 1 Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In. A. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 336–357). New York: Oxford University Press. Wertsch, 1998 West, 2003, Innovation implementation in work teams, 245 Wood, 1976, The role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x Woods, P. (2002).Teaching and learning in the new millennium. In C. Surgue, & C. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives (pp. 73–91). London: Routledge. Zhang, 2009, Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7, 10.1080/10508400802581676