Theoretical and experimental studies on the thermal decomposition and fire‐extinguishing performance of cis‐1,1,1,4,4,4‐hexafluoro‐2‐butene

Yue Wang1, Xingyu Wang2, Xiao Zhang2, Haolun Fu1, Zhaoyang Tan1, Haijun Zhang2
1Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Technology and High Efficient Energy Saving, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Chemical Process Safety, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
2Center for Aircraft Fire and Emergency, Department of Safety Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, China

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Due to the environmental problems caused by the existing Halon substitutes, it is essential to explore new extinguishants with better environmental friendliness. In this study, in order to evaluate the practicability of cis‐1,1,1,4,4,4‐hexafluoro‐2‐butene (HFO‐1336mzz(Z)) as a potential Halon substitution product, the thermal decomposition mechanism and fire‐extinguishing performance of HFO‐1336mzz(Z) were studied by using density functional theory calculation and experimental analysis. The computational results show that thermal decomposition of HFO‐1336mzz(Z) would result in some products that can further react with active OH˙ and H˙ radicals, which are indispensable reactants in the flame and combustion. Moreover, during the interaction between HFO‐1336mzz(Z) and flame, the fire‐extinguishing radical CF3˙ would be produced, indicating the chemical‐extinguishing mechanism and the pronounced fire‐extinguishing performance of HFO‐1336mzz(Z). To explore its actual fire‐extinguishing effect, the fire‐extinguishing concentration (FEC) of HFO‐1336mzz(Z) on methane‐air flame was measured in cup‐burner. The FEC value of HFO‐1336mzz(Z) is 6.84% in volume, which is lower than those of HFC‐125 and HFC‐116, and is slightly higher than that of HFC‐236fa. Both the experimental and theoretical results suggest that HFO‐1336mzz(Z) can be a promising candidate for Halon substitute.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/249810a0

10.1021/es00055a036

10.1002/rog.20013

10.1016/j.theochem.2008.12.021

10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.10.002

United States Environmental Protection Agency Protection of stratospheric ozone: Allowance system for controlling HCFC production import and export (40 CFR part 82) 2001.

10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.05.008

10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.10.022

10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.001

National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST GCR 06‐901—Environmentally acceptable extinguishants 2007.

10.1021/jp076344u

10.1016/S0010-2180(96)00052-1

10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.06.055

10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.07.009

Yu Y. G., 2005, Univ. Sci. Technol., 29, 586

Frisch M. J., 2016, Gaussian 16, Revision B.01

10.1039/b316867k

10.1002/jcc.23470

International Organization for Standardization Determination of flame extinguishing concentration of gaseous extinsuishants by the cup burner method (Appendix B of ISO 14520‐1) 2006.

National Fire Protection Association. Standard on clean agent fire extinguishing systems (NFPA 2001) 2015.

Ni X. M., 2015, Highlights Sci., 8, 1096

Luo Y. R., 2005, Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds

10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.10.020

Zhou B., 2010, Acta Chim. Sinica, 68, 1829

10.1016/j.jfluchem.2016.08.006

Li M. Q., 2002, Design of Clean Gas Fire Extinguishing system—HFC‐227ea System

10.1021/jp971300e

10.1016/0010-2180(94)90125-2

10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00162-5