The value of forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis at the European scale and application to national ecosystem accounting

Acharya, 2019, Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – an analysis of publications, Ecosyst. Serv., 39, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100979 Barrio, 2010, A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1023, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.016 Barton, 2018, (Dis) integrated valuation—assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support, Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 529, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021 Barton, D.N., Caparrós, A., Conner, N., Turpie, J., Edens, B., Piaggio, M., 2019. Working group 5: Valuation and accounting treatments Discussion paper 5.1: Defining exchange and welfare values, articulating institutional arrangements and establishing the valuation context for ecosystem accounting. Pp. 107. Bateman, 2003, Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values, Land Econ., 79, 235, 10.2307/3146869 Bateman, 1999, Developing a methodology for benefit transfersusing geographical information systems: modeling demand forwoodland Recreation, Reg. Stud., 33, 191, 10.1080/00343409950082391 Brander, 2006, The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature, Environ. Resour. Econ., 33, 223, 10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4 Brander, 2007, The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ., 63, 209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.002 Bravo-Oviedo, 2014, European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives, For. Syst., 23, 518 Boyle, 2017, Benefit transfer for ecosystem services Brouwer, 2000, Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects, Ecol. Econ., 32, 137, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1 Chiabai, 2011, Economic assessment of forest ecosystem services losses: cost of policy inaction, Environ. Resour. Econ., 50, 405, 10.1007/s10640-011-9478-6 Costanza, 1997, The value of the world's ecosystems services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0 Dinerstein, 2017, An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm, Bioscience, 67, 534, 10.1093/biosci/bix014 Frélichová, 2014, Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic, Ecosyst. Serv., 8, 110, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001 Grammatikopoulou, 2020, Could benefit transfer be a promising method for ecosystem accounting applications? Submitted as part of the Thematic Session, “Benefit Transfer for Natural Capital Accounting” Groot, 2012, Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 50, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M.B., 2018. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. <www.cices.eu>. Hjerpe, 2015, Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: a meta-analysis, J. For. Econ., 21, 32 Johnston, 2010, Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer, J. Econ. Surv., 24, 479 Johnston, 2015 Johnston, 2018, Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values: progress, prospects and challenges, Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ., 12, 177, 10.1561/101.00000102 Johnston, 2020, Targeted guidelines to enhance the validity and credibility of environmental benefit transfers. submitted as part of the thematic session Kaul, 2013, What can we learn from benefit transfer errors? Evidence from 20 years of research on convergent validity, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 66, 90, 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.03.001 Kirchhoff, 1997, Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: an empirical inquiry, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 33, 75, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0981 La Notte, 2017, Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: a case study for in-stream nitrogen retention, Ecosyst. Serv., 23, 18, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002 La Notte, A., Vallecillo, S., Polce, C., Zulian, G., Maes, J., 2017. Implementing an EU system of accounting for ecosystems and their services. Initial proposals for the implementation of ecosystem services accounts, EUR 28681 EN; Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.2760/214137, JRC107150. La Notte, 2019, Beyond the economic boundaries to account for ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 35, 116, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.007 La Notte, A.,Grammatikopoulou, I., Grunewald, K., Barton, D.N., Beyhan, K., 2021. Ecosystem and ecosystem services accounts: time for applications. EUR 30588 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92-76-30142-4, https://doi.org/10.2760/01033, JRC123667. Lara-Pulido, 2018, A meta-analysis of economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 126, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.018 Lindhjem, 2007, 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis, J. For. Econ., 12, 251 Loomis, 2006, Reducing barriers in future benefit transfers: needed improvements in primary study design and reporting, Ecol. Econ., 60, 343, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.006 Maes, 2012, Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 31, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Müller, 2019, Can existing estimates for ecosystem service values inform forest management?, Forests, 10, 132, 10.3390/f10020132 Navrud, S., Brouwer, R., 2007, Good practice guidelines in benet transfer of forest externalities, Technical report, COST Action E45, European Forest Externalities (EUROFOREX). Newbold, 2020, Valuing non-market valuation studies using meta-analysis: a demonstration using estimates of willingness-to-pay for water quality improvements, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 104, 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102379 Ninan, 2013, Valuing forest ecosystem services: What we know and what we don’t, Ecol. Econ., 93, 137, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.005 Ojea, 2016, Ecosystem services and REDD: estimating the benefits of non-carbon services in worldwide forests, World Dev., 78, 246, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.002 Ojea, 2010, Mapping biodiversity indicators and assessing biodiversity values in global forests, Environ. Resour. Econ., 47, 329, 10.1007/s10640-010-9381-6 Richardson, 2015, The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation, Ecol. Econ., 115, 51, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 Rosenberger, 2003, Benefit transfer, 445 Rosenberger, 2006, Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in bene_ts transfers and their management, Ecol. Econ., 60, 372{378, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.018 Rosenberger, 2015, Benefit transfer validity and reliability TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity, 2010 UN, 1993. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting Interim version. Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, Statistical Division, United Nations, New York. UNEP, 2015. United Nations Statistical Division, Convention of Biological Diversity, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting: Technical Recommendations. Consultation Draft – December. Downloadable at <http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/meetings/eleventh_meeting/BK-11-3b-2.pdf>. UN, 2017. Technical Recommendations in Support of the System of Environmental – Economic Accounting 2012 – Experimental Ecosystem Accounting, 193. United Nations: White cover publication. UN, 2020. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting— Ecosystem Accounting Draft for the Global Consultation on the complete document. Vačkářů, 2019, Toward development of ecosystem asset accounts at the national level, Ecosyst. Health Sustainability, 5, 1, 10.1080/20964129.2018.1560233 Vačkářů, 2018, Methodological aspects of ecosystem service valuation at the national level, One Ecosyst., 3 Vallecillo, S., La Notte, A., Kakoulaki, G., Kamberaj, J., Robert, N., Dottori, F., Feyen, L., Rega, C., Maes, J., 2019a. Ecosystem services accounting. Part II-Pilot accounts for crop and timber provision, global climate regulation and flood control, EUR 29731 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from <http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC116334>. Zandersen, 2009, A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, J. For. Econ., 15, 109 Zandersen, 2005, Benefit Transfer over Time of Ecosystem Values: the Case of Forest Recreation Hein, 2011, Economic benefits generated by protected areas: the case of the Hoge Veluwe forest, the Netherlands, Ecol. Soci., 16, 13, 10.5751/ES-04119-160213 Manes, 2016, Regulating Ecosystem Services of forests in ten Italian Metropolitan Cities: air quality improvement by PM 10 and O 3 removal, Ecol. Indic., 67, 425, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.009 Barth, 2016, Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach, Ecosyst. Serv., 21, 39, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.012 Caparrós, 2017, Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: theory and application to free access recreation, Ecol. Econ., 139, 140, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.011 Goio, 2008, The development of forest accounting in the province of Trento (Italy), J. For. Econ., 14, 177 Häyhä, 2015, Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests, Ecosyst. Serv., 14, 12, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.001 Meyerhoff, 2012, Valuing the benefits of implementing a national strategy on biological diversity—the case of Germany, Environ. Sci. Policy, 23, 109, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.020 Matero, 2007, In search of marginal environmental valuations — ecosystem services in Finnish forest accounting, Ecol. Econ., 61, 101, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.006 Ovando, 2016, Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms, For. Policy Econ., 71, 43, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.031 Paletto, 2015, Mapping the value of ecosystem services: a case study from the Austrian Alps, Ann. For. Res., 58, 157, 10.15287/afr.2015.335 Šišák, 2016, Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic—their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use, Land Use Policy, 50, 390, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006 Grêt-Regamey, 2008, Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region, J. Environ. Manag., 89, 197, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.019 Gołos, 2009, The value of the water-protecting function of forests, J. Water Land Dev., 13a, 10.2478/v10025-010-0028-3 Bernués, 2014, Socio-cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean mountain agroecosystems, PLoS ONE, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0102479 Grilli, 2017, A method to assess the economic impacts of forest biomass use on ecosystem services in a National Park, Biomass Bioenergy, 98, 252, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.033 Getzner, 2017, Gravitational natural hazards: Valuing the protective function of Alpine forests, For. Policy Econ., 80, 150, 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.015 Fusaro, 2017, Mapping and assessment of PM10 and O3 removal by woody vegetation at urban and regional level, Remote Sens., 9, 791, 10.3390/rs9080791 Schaubroeck, 2016, Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios; a case study of a Scots pine forest, J. Environ. Manag., 173, 79, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.005 Brey, 2007, Estimation of forest values using choice modeling: An application to Spanish forests, Ecol. Econ., 64, 305, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.006 Bastian, 2017, Ecosystem services of characteristic biotope types in the Ore Mountains (Germany/Czech Republic), Int. J. Biodiv. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manag., 13, 51, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1248865 Kazak, 2016, Carbon sequestration in forest valuation, Real Estate Manag. Valuation, 24, 10.1515/remav-2016-0007 Grilli, 2015, Stakeholders’ preferences and economic value of forest ecosystem services: An example in the Italian Alps, Baltic For., 21, 298 Popa, 2016, Forest ecosystem services valuation in different management scenarios: a case study of the Maramures Mountains, Baltic For., 22, 327 Olschewski, 2012, Avalanche protection by forests — a choice experiment in the Swiss Alps, For. Policy Econ., 17, 19, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.016 Ezebilo, 2016, Economic value of a non-market ecosystem service: an application of the travel cost method to nature recreation in Sweden, Int. J. Biodiv. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manag., 1, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1202322 Hlaváčková, 2016, Selected results of the survey focused on the economic assessment of forest ecosystem services, J. For. Sci., 61, 282, 10.17221/12/2015-JFS Termansen, 2013, Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services, Ecol. Econ., 92, 48, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.001 Bastian, O., Stein, C., Lupp, G., Behrens, J., Renner, C., Grunewald, K., 2015. The appreciation of nature and landscape by tourism service providers and visitors in the Ore Mountains (Germany). Landscape Online:pp. 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3097/LO.201541. Pechanec, 2017, Monetary valuation of natural forest habitats in protected areas, Forests, 8, 427, 10.3390/f8110427 Caboun, 2014, Concept of the integrative aspects of the forest ecosystem services with case study on recreation services assessment in Slovakia, Ecol. Process., 3, 10.1186/s13717-014-0015-8