The unintended consequences of metrics in technology evaluation

Journal of Informetrics - Tập 1 - Trang 103-114 - 2007
Ronald N. Kostoff1, Elie Geisler2
1Office of Naval Research, 875 N. Randolph Street, Arlington, VA 22217, United States
2Stuart School of Business, Illinois Institute of Technology, 565 W. Adams Street, Chicago, IL 60661, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Council on Competitiveness (2004). National Innovation Initiative Report: Innovate America. Washington, DC. Couzzarin, 2006, Complementarities between organizational strategies and innovation, Economies of Innovation & New Technology, 15, 195, 10.1080/10438590500222691 Das, 2000, Competing with new product technologies: A process model of strategy, Management Science, 46, 1300, 10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1300.12276 Egghe, 1990 Ethiraj, 2004, Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 404, 10.2307/4131441 Galbraith, 1985 Geisler, 1995, When whales are cast ashore: The conversion to relevancy of US basic research and universities, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 3, 10.1109/17.366398 Geisler, 2000 Godener, 2004, Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: An exploratory study, R&D Management, 34, 191, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00333.x Kaplan, 1996 Kaplan, 2006 Katz, 2006, Web indicators for complex innovation systems, Research Evaluation, 15, 85, 10.3152/147154406781775922 Kerssens-Van Drongelen, 1999, R&D performance measurement: More than choosing a set of metrics, R&D Management, 29, 35, 10.1111/1467-9310.00115 Klavans, 2006, Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 251, 10.1002/asi.20274 Kostoff, 2002, Overcoming Specialization, BioScience, 52, 937, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0937:OS]2.0.CO;2 Kostoff, 2006, Systematic acceleration of radical discovery and innovation in science and technology, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 923, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.004 Lessenius, 1998, The interactive goal panel: A methodology for assigning R&D activities with corporate strategy Loch, 2002, Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 185, 10.1111/1540-5885.1930185 Mann, G., Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2006). Bibliometric impact measures leveraging topic analysis. JCDL, June 11–15. Pun, 2005, A Performance measurement paradigm for integrating strategy formulation: A review of systems and frameworks, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 49, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00106.x Rubenstein, 1988, The use of indicators and measures of the R&D process in evaluating science and technology programs, 185 Shupe, 2006, Developing and implementing a strategy for technology deployment, Information Management Journal, 40, 52 Siggelkow, 2006, When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 779, 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083053 Souitaris, 2002, Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation, Research Policy, 31, 877, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00154-8 Weingart, 2005, Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences, Scientometrics, 62, 117, 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7 Weiss, 2005, Our incredible shrinking curiosity, The Washington Post, B-01 Werner, 1997, Measuring R&D performance: State of the art, Research Technology Management, 40, 34, 10.1080/08956308.1997.11671115