The time course of episodic associative retrieval: Electrophysiological correlates of cued recall of unimodal and crossmodal pair-associate learning
Tóm tắt
Little is known about the time course of processes supporting episodic cued recall. To examine these processes, we recorded event-related scalp electrical potentials during episodic cued recall following pair-associate learning of unimodal object-picture pairs and crossmodal object-picture and sound pairs. Successful cued recall of unimodal associates was characterized by markedly early scalp potential differences over frontal areas, while cued recall of both unimodal and crossmodal associates were reflected by subsequent differences recorded over frontal and parietal areas. Notably, unimodal cued recall success divergences over frontal areas were apparent in a time window generally assumed to reflect the operation of familiarity but not recollection processes, raising the possibility that retrieval success effects in that temporal window may reflect additional mnemonic processes beyond familiarity. Furthermore, parietal scalp potential recall success differences, which did not distinguish between crossmodal and unimodal tasks, seemingly support attentional or buffer accounts of posterior parietal mnemonic function but appear to constrain signal accumulation, expectation, or representational accounts.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Addante, R. J., Watrous, A. J., Yonelinas, A. P., Ekstrom, A. D., & Ranganath, C. (2011). Prestimulus theta activity predicts correct source memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10702–10707. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014528108
Allan, K., Doyle, M. C., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of word-stem cued recall. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 251–262. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00061-4
Allan, K., & Rugg, M. D. (1997). An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35, 387–397. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00094-2
Allan, K., Wolf, A. H., Rosenthal, C. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). The effect of retrieval cues on post-retrieval monitoring in episodic memory: An electrophysiological study. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 289–299. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00061-1
Ally, B. A., & Budson, A. E. (2007). The worth of pictures: Using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory. NeuroImage, 35, 378–395. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.023
Ally, B. A., Simons, J. S., McKeever, J. D., Peers, P. V., & Budson, A. E. (2008). Parietal contributions to recollection: Electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1800–1812. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.026
Bagiella, E., Sloan, R. P., & Heitjan, D. F. (2000). Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 37, 13–20. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3710013
Bastin, C., Diana, R. A., Simon, J., Collette, F., Yonelinas, A. P., & Salmon, E. (2013). Associative memory in aging: The effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology and Aging, 28, 275–83. doi:10.1037/a0031566
Bergström, Z. M., Henson, R. N., Taylor, J. R., & Simons, J. S. (2013). Multimodal imaging revelas the spatiotemporal dynamics of recollection. NeuroImage, 68, 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.030
Buchsbaum, B. R., Ye, D., & D'Esposito, M. (2011). Recency effects in the inferior parietal lobe during verbal recognition memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 59. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00059
Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., & Moscovitch, M. (2012). Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: An integrative theoretical account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 338–52. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008
Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C., Levine, B., Ween, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory are dissociated in posterior parietal cortex: Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4943–4956. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1209-09.2010
Cruse, D. C., & Wilding, E. L. (2011). Temporally and functionally dissociable retrieval processing operations revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1751–1760. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.053
Curran, T., & Dien, J. (2003). Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 40, 979–988. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00116
Curran, T., & Doyle, J. (2011). Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1247–1262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21464
de Zubicaray, G., McMahon, K., Eastburn, M., Pringle, A. J., Lorenz, L., & Humphreys, M. S. (2007). Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 45, 824–835. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.013
Diana, R. A., Van den Boom, W., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2011). ERP correlates of source memory: Unitized source information increases familiarity-based retrieval. Brain Research, 1367, 278–286. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.030
Diana, R. A., Vilberg, K. L., & Reder, L. M. (2005). Identifying the ERP correlate of a recognition memory search attempt. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 674–684. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.001
Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2008). The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 730–740. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730
Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition memory for new associations: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36, 377–395. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00143-7
Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1999). Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: Electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 1–16. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00051-2
Donaldson, D. I., Wheeler, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2010). Remember the source: Dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 377–391. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21242
Dzulkifli, M. A., Sharpe, H. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2004). Separating item-related electrophysiological indices of retrieval effort and retrieval orientation. Brain and Cognition, 55, 433–443. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.004
Ecker, U. K., & Zimmer, H. D. (2009). ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1907–1919. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21135
Ecker, U. K. H., Zimmer, H. D., Groh-Bordin, C., & Mecklinger, A. (2007). Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context — An electrophysiological study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64, 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.005
Fay, S., Isingrini, M., Ragot, R., & Pouthas, V. (2005). The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 615–626. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.014
Friedman, D., & Johnson, R. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 6–28. doi:10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:1<6::AID-JEMT2>3.3.CO;2-I
Grunwald, T., Pezer, N., Münte, T., Kurthen, M., Lehnertz, K., Van Roost, D., ... Elger, C. E. (2003). Dissecting out conscious and unconscious memory (sub)processes within the human medial temporal lobe. NeuroImage, 20, S139–S145. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.004
Habib, R., & Nyberg, L. (2008). Neural correlates of availability and accessibility in memory. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1720–1726. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm201
Halsband, T. M., Ferdinand, N. K., Bridger, E. K., & Mecklinger, A. (2012). Monetary rewards influence retrieval orientations. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 430–445. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0093-y
Haramati, S., Soroker, N., Dudai, Y., & Levy, D. A. (2008). The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1756–1766. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.015
Hayama, H. R., Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2012). Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: Evidence for a generic recollection network? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1127–1137. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00202
Heil, M., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1996). Topographically distinct cortical activation in episodic long-term memory: The retrieval of spatial versus verbal information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 777–795. doi:10.3758/BF03201102
Henson, R. N. A., Shallice, T., Josephs, O., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of proactive interference during spoken cued recall. NeuroImage, 17, 543–558. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1229
Herzmann, G., Jin, M., Cordes, D., & Curran, T. (2012). A within-subject ERP and fMRI investigation of orientation-specific recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 174–192. doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.669364
Hornberger, M., Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: Effects of study-test similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1196–1210. doi:10.1162/0898929041920450
Iidaka, T., Matsumoto, A., Nogawa, J., Yamamoto, Y., & Sadato, N. (2006). Frontoparietal network involved in successful retrieval from episodic memory. spatial and temporal analyses using fMRI and ERP. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1349–1360. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl040
Jäger, T., Mecklinger, A., & Kipp, K. H. (2006). Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron, 52, 535–45. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.013
Johnson, R., Jr., Kreiter, K., Zhu, J., & Russo, B. (1998). A spatio-temporal comparison of semantic and episodic cued recall and recognition using event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 119–136. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00017-2
Khader, P., Burke, M., Bien, S., Ranganath, C., & Rösler, F. (2005a). Content-specific activation during associative long-term memory retrieval. NeuroImage, 27, 805–816. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.006
Khader, P., Heil, M., & Rösler, F. (2005b). Material-specific long-term memory representations of faces and spatial positions: Evidence from slow event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 43, 2109–2124. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.012
Kim, H. (2011). Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 814–836. doi:10.1002/hbm.21474
Levy, D. A. (2012). Towards an understanding of parietal mnemonic processes: Some conceptual guideposts. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 41. doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00041
MacKenzie, G., & Donaldson, D. I. (2009). Examining the neural basis of episodic memory: ERP evidence that faces are recollected differently from names. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2756–2765. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.025
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Covington, J., Townsend, J., Sejnowski, T. J., & Courchesne, E. (1999). Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2665–2680.
Mayes, A., Montaldi, D., & Migo, E. (2007). Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.003
Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565–582. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3750565
Meltzer, J. A., & Constable, R. T. (2005). Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates. NeuroImage, 24, 384–397. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.001
Mollison, M. V., & Curran, T. (2012). Familiarity in source memory. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2546–2565. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.027
Moscovitch, M. (1992). Memory and working-with-memory: A component process model based on modules and central systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 257–267. doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.257
Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (2002). The frontal cortex and working with memory. In T. D. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 188–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.003.0012
Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2012). Midazolam-induced amnesia reduces memory for details and affects the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 416–427. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00154
O'Connor, A. R., Han, S., & Dobbins, I. G. (2010). The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory: Expectancy violation or successful retrieval? The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2924–2934. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4225-09.2010
Okada, K., Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2012). Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 523–533. doi:10.1002/hbm.21229
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2011/156869
Opitz, B. (2010). Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory. Brain and Cognition, 73, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.003
Paller, K. A., Lucas, H. D., & Voss, J. L. (2012). Assuming too much from “familiar” brain potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 313–315. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.010
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, The R Core team (2007) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-86.
Robb, W. G., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 583–589. doi:10.3758/BF03196316
Rugg, M., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
Rugg, M., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 108–115. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01445-5
Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (1997). Recognition memory for words and pictures: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 8, 3281–3285. doi:10.1097/00001756-199710200-00018
Schott, B. H., Henson, R. N., Richardson-Klavehn, A., Becker, C., Thoma, V., Heinze, H.-J., & Düzel, E. (2005). Redefining implicit and explicit memory: The functional neuroanatomy of priming, remembering, and control of retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1257–1262. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409070102
Seibert, T. M., Gimbel, S. I., Hagler, D. J., Jr., & Brewer, J. B. (2011a). Parietal activity in episodic retrieval measured by fMRI and MEG. NeuroImage, 55, 788–793. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.078
Seibert, T. M., Hagler, D. J., & Brewer, J. B. (2011b). Early parietal response in episodic retrieval revealed with MEG. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 171–181. doi:10.1002/hbm.21014
Shimamura, A. P. (2011). Episodic retrieval and the cortical binding of relational activity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 277–291. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0031-4
Staresina, B. P., & Davachi, L. (2010). Object unitization and associative memory formation are supported by distinct brain regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 9890–7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0826-10.2010
Staresina, B. P., Fell, J., Lam, A. T. A. D., Axmacher, N., & Henson, R. N. (2012). Memory signals are temporally dissociated in and across human hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1167–1173. doi:10.1038/nn.3154
Tibon, R., Vakil, E., Goldstein, A., & Levy, D. A. (2012). Unitization and temporality in associative memory: Evidence from modulation of context effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.003
Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). Functional significance of retrieval-related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1490–1501. doi:10.1002/hbm.20618
Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 445–453. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001
Wilding, E. L., & Ranganath, C. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of episodic memory processes. In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of ERP Components (pp. 373–396). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0187
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889–905. doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.889
Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100, 125–135. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
Yu, S. S., & Rugg, M. D. (2010). Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Research, 1320, 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.071