The telome theory

Arber, Agnes. 1930. Root and shoot in the angiosperms: A study of some morphological categories New Phyt.29: 297–315. —. 1937. The interpretation of the flower: a study of some aspects of morphological thought. Biol. Rev.12: 157–183. Arber, Agnes. 1350. The natural philosophy of plant form. 247 p. Baxter, R. W. 1949. Some pteridosperm stems and fructifications with particular reference to the Medullosae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.36: 287–352. Bertrand, P. 1947. Les végétaux vasculaires. 184 p. Bower, F. O. 1884. On the comparative morphology of the leaf in the vascular cryptogams and gymnosperms. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. [London]175: (2): 565–613. — 1916. On leaf-architecture as illuminated by a study of the Pteridophyta. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.51: Part 3. 657–708. Bower, F. O. 1935. Primitive land plants. 658 p. Browne, Isabel M. P. 1935. Some views on the morphology and phylogeny of the leafy vascular sporophyte. Bot. Rev.1: 383–404, 427–447. Canright, J. E. 1952. Comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. 1. Trends of specialization in the stamens. Am. Jour. Bot.39: 484–497. Chrysler, M. A. 1945. The shoot ofBotrychium interpreted as a series of dichotomies. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club.72: 491–505. Delevoryas, T. andMorgan, Jeanne. 1953. Observations on petiolar branching and foliage of an AmericanBotryopteris. Am. Mid. Nat. (In press). Eames, A. J. 1936. Morphology of vascular plants. Lower groups. 433 p. — 1950. Again: ‘The New Morphology’. New Phyt.50: 17–35. Florin, R. 1938–1945. Die Koniferen des Oberkarbons und des unteren Perms. Paleontographia85 B: Heft 1–8. —. 1949. The morphology ofTrichopitys heteromorpha Saporta, a seed-plant of Paleozoic age, and the evolution of the female flowers in the Ginkgiinae. Acta Horti Bergiani15: 79–108. — 1951. Evolution inCordaites and conifers. Acta Horti Bergiani15: 285–388. Foster, A. S. 1950. Morphology and venation of the leaf inQuiina acutangula Duke. Am. Jour. Bot.37: 159–171. Halle, T. G. The position and arrangement of the spore-producing members of the Paleozoic pteridosperms. Deuxième Congrès pour l'Avancement des Études de Stratigraphie Carbonifère, Heerlen, Compte Rendu1: 227–235. Hunt, K. W. 1937. A study of the style and stigma, with reference to the nature of the carpel. Am. Jour. Bot24: 288–295. Lam, H. J. 1948. Classification and the new morphology. Acta Biotheoretica8: 107–154. — 1947–48. A new system of the Cormophyta. Blumea6: 282–289. Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. 823 p. Lignier, O. 1903. Equisétales et Sphénophyllales. Leur origine filicinéene commune. Bull. Soc. Linn. Norm. V.7–8: 93–137. — 1908a Sur l'origine, des Sphénophylées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France35: 278–288. Lignier, O. 1908b. Essai sur l'évolution morphologique du régne végetal. Assoc. Franc. l'Avance. Sci. Compt. Rend. 37 session, Clermont-Ferrand. 530–542. Potonié, H. 1912. Grundlinien der Pflanzen-Morphologie in Lichte der Päleontologie. 259 p. Puri, V. 1947. Studies in floral anatomy. IV. Vascular anatomy of the flower of certain species of the Passifloraceae. Am. Jour. Bot.34: 562–573. Reece, P. C. 1939. The floral anatomy of the avocado. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 429–433. St. John, E. P. 1952. The evolution of the Ophioglossaceae of the eastern United States. III. The evolution of the leaf. Quart. Jour. Florida Acad. Sci15: 1–19. Schopf, J. F. 1948. Pteridosperm male fructifications: American species ofDolerotheca, with notes regarding certain allied forms. Jour. Paleont.22: 681–724. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. 643 p. Stewart, W. andDelevoryas, T. 1952. Bases for determining relationships among the Medullosaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.39: 505–516. Takhtajan, A. L. 1953. Phylogenetic principles of the system of higher plants. Bot. Rev.19: 1–45. Torrey, R. E. 1932. General botany for colleges. 449 p. Van Der Hammen, L. 1947–48. Traces of ancient dichotomies in angiosperms. Blumea6: 290–301. Wagner, W. H. 1952. Types of foliar dichotomy in living ferns. Am. Jour. Bot.39: 578–592. Wilde, Mary H. 1944. A new interpretation of coniferous cones. I. Podocarpaceae (Podocarpus). Ann. Bot. n. s.8: 1–41. Wilson, C. L. 1937. The phylogeny of the stamen Am. Jour. Bot.24: 686–699. — 1942. The telome theory and the origin of the stamen. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 759–764. — 1950. Vasculation of the stamen in the Melastomaceae, with some phyletic implications. Am. Jour. Bot.37: 431–444. Zimmermann, W. 1930. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen. 452 p. Zimmermann, W. 1938. Phylogenie.In Verdoorn, Fr. Manual of Pteridiology. Chap. 23. — 1942. Die Phylogenie des Ophioglossaceen-Blattes. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.60(9): 416–433. Zimmermann, W. 1945a. Paläobotanik.In Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. Handbuch der Biologie. Lieferung 21. Band 4(8). Zimmermann, W. 1945b. Hauptergibnisse der “Telomtheorie”. 3 p. [Privately printed, Tübingen]. Zimmermann, W. 1948. Phylogenie der Pflanzen. Naturforschung und medizin in Deutschland 1939-46. Für Deutschland Bestimmte Ausgabe der Fiat Review of German Science 54: Biologie Teil III. Spezielle Botanik 193–225. — 1948. Stammesgeschichtliche Entwicklung unserer Heilpflanzen. Sonderdruck aus der Südd. Apotheker-Zeitung Nr. 14. 399–406. Zimmermann, W. 1949. Geschichte der Pflanzen. 111 p. — 1950. Über Urpflanzen und Urlandpflanzen. Naturwiss. Rundschau, Heft 6. 259–265. — 1952. Main results of the telome theory. The Paleobotanist1 (Birbal Sahni Memorial Volume): 456–470.