The super‐metadata framework for managing long‐term access to digital data objects

AlisonChilvers1
1Burnley, Lancashire, UK

Tóm tắt

This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper‐based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long‐term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super‐metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the “public good” argument for the long‐term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author’s Loughborough University phD thesis, “Managing long‐term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach”, written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bainbridge, D. (1999), Intellectual Property, 4th ed., Financial Times, with Pitman, London.

Barker, P. (1997), “Electronic libraries of the future”, in Kent, A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Dekker, New York, NY, Vol. 59, pp. 119‐53.

Beagrie, N. (2000), JISC Digital Preservation Focus and the Digital Preservation Coalition. Available at: www.rlg.org/events/pres‐2000/beagrie.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Bennett, J.C. (1997), A Framework of Data Types and Formats, and Issues Affecting the Long‐Term Preservation of Digital Materials, JISC/NPO studies on the Preservation of Electronic Materials, British Library Research and Innovation Report, 50, British Library Research and Innovation Centre, London. Available at: www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/bl/jisc‐npo50/bennet.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Brenner, W., Zarnekow, R. and Wittig, H. (1998), Intelligent Software Agents: Foundations and Applications, Springer, Berlin.

Checkland, P. (1984), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, reproduced with corrections, Wiley, Chichester.

Chilvers, A.H. (2000a), “Managing long‐term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach”, PhD thesis, Loughborough University.

Chilvers, A. (2000b), “Critical issues in the use of soft systems methodology – a case study in the long‐term management of digital data objects”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 167‐77.

Chilvers, A. and Feather, J. (1998), “The management of digital data: a metadata approach”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 365‐72.

Copps, A. (1999), “British Library opens up to free Web access”, Times Interface, 8 September, p. 2.

Copyright, Design and Patents Act (1988), Stationery Office, London.

Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations (1997), SI 1997:3032, Stationery Office, London.

Crown Copyright in the Information Age: A Consultation Document on Access to Public Sector Information (1998), Stationery Office, London, green paper (Cm3819).

Day, M. (1996), Interoperability Between Metadata Formats. ROADS Workshop, Wellcome Institute, London, 8 August. Available at: www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/presentations/roads‐august1996/ (accessed 16 October 2001).

Dempsey, L. and Heery, R. (1998), “Metadata: a current view of practice and issues”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 145‐72.

Department of National Heritage et al. (1997), Legal Deposit of Publications: A Consultation Paper, Department of National Heritage, London.

Erlandsson, A. (1997), Electronic Records Management: A Literature Review, Studies International Council on Archives, Paris, 10.

European Commission (1997), Amended Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 10 December, (COM(97) 628 final), 597PC0628.

European Commission (1999), Amended Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 21 May, Brussels, COM(1999) 250 final, 599PC0250.

Graham, P.S. (1993), “Intellectual preservation and the electronic environment”, in Martin, R.S. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication in an Electronic Environment: Issues for Research Libraries, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp. 71‐101.

Harnad, S. (1999), E‐Biomed: Very Important NIH Proposal, 8 May 1999. Available at: www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/lis‐elib/1999‐05/0008 (accessed 16 October 2001).

Haynes, D. et al. (1997), Responsibility for Digital Archiving and Long Term Access to Digital Data: A JISC/NPO Study with the Electronic Libraries (eLib) Programme on the Preservation of Electronic Materials, Library Information Technology Centre, London.

Hedstrom, M. (1995), “Preserving the intellectual record: a view from the archives”, in Dempsey, L. et al. (Eds), Networking and the Future of Libraries 2: Managing the Intellectual Record, an International Conference Held at the University of Bath, 19‐21 April 1998, Library Association and University of Bath, London, pp. 179‐91.

Hedstrom, M. (1998), “The role of national initiatives in digital preservation”, in National Preservation Office and Research Libraries Group, Guidelines for Digital Imaging: Papers Given at the Joint National Preservation Office and Research Libraries Group Preservation Conference in Warwick, 28‐30 September 1998, National Preservation Office, London, pp. 85‐7.

Hendley, T. (1996), The Preservation of Digital Materials, BLRD report, 6242, Research and Development Department, British Library, London.

Hendley, T. (1998), Comparison of Methods and Costs of Digital Preservation, JISC/NPO studies on the preservation of electronic materials, British Library Research and Innovation Report, p. 106, British Library Research and Innovation Centre, London.

Introduction to CORDS (2001), available at: www.loc.gov/copyright/cords/cords2001.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Joint Information Systems Committee/National Science Foundation (2000), International Digital Libraries Programme: Emulation for Preservation: Project Proposal. Available at: www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/JISCNSF/proposal.htm (accessed 16 October 2001).

Kandur, H. (1992), “The management of electronic records”, PhD thesis, University College London.

Kenny, A. (1996), “Increased deposits on the next century”, Times Higher Education Supplement, 8 March, p. vii.

Mandel, C.A. (1996), “Enduring access to digital information: understanding the challenge”, European Research Libraries Cooperation, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 453‐64.

Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (2001), Foot and Mouth Disease. Available at: www.maff.gov.uk/animalh/diseases/fmd/default.htm (accessed 18 June 2001).

National Digital Archive of Datasets (2001), NDAD Contributors Section: Information and Resources for Departmental Staff Responsible for Transferring Datasets to NDAD. Available at: www.ndad.ulcc.ac.uk/contributors/ (accessed 16 October 2001).

Neavill, G.B. (1984), “Electronic publishing, libraries and the survival of information”, Library Resources & Technical Services, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 76‐89.

Ross, S. (1997), “Consensus, communication, and collaboration: fostering multidisciplinary cooperation in electronic records”, in Proceedings of the DLM‐Forum on Electronic Records, Brussels, 18‐20 December 1996, Office for Official Publications of European Communities, Luxembourg, pp. 330‐6. (European Archives News, Supplement 2).

Rothenberg, J. (2000), An Experiment in Using Emulation to Preserve Digital Publications, The Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague. Available at: www.kb.nl/coop/nedlib/results/emulationpreservationreport.pdf (accessed 16 October 2001).

Russell, K. and Weinberger, E. (2000), Cost Elements of Digital Preservation (Draft of 31 May). Available at: www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/documents/CIW01r.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Shepherd, E. (1996), The Management of Electronic Records, Library and Information Briefings, No. 69, Library and Information Technology Centre, London.

Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information (1996), Preserving Digital Information. Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information Commissioned by the Commission on Preservation and Access and the Research Libraries Group, Commission on Preservation and Access and the Research Libraries Group, Washington, DC. Available at: www.rlg.org/ArchTF/ (accessed 16 October 2001).

Thomas, T. (1998), “Archives in a new paradigm of scientific publishing: physical review online archives (PROLA), D‐lib Magazine, May. Available at: www.mirrored.ukoln.ac.uk/lis‐journals/dlib/dlib/dlib/may98/05thomas.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Thompson, B. (1998), “The mother of all filing jobs”, Internet Magazine, Vol. 48, November, pp. 62‐8.

Woodley, M. (2000), “Crosswalks: the path to universal access”, in Baca, M. (Ed.), Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information, Version 2.0. Available at: www.getty.edu/research/institute/standards/intrometadata/2_articles/woodley/index.html (accessed 16 October 2001).

Working Party on Legal Deposit (1999), Report. Available at: www.bl.uk/information/legal‐depositgrp.html (accessed 16 October 2001).