The strategic evaluation of academic libraries

JuhaKettunen1
1Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to analyse the network strategies of academic libraries and presents an approach to the evaluation of strategic plans and their implementation.Design/methodology/approachThe balanced scorecard approach is used as a framework for organisations to communicate and implement their strategic plans.FindingsIt is shown in this study that the balanced scorecard also provides a general framework for the evaluation of the strategy and performance from different perspectives.Practical implicationsThe concept of the strategy map is used to illustrate the objectives of the strategic plans of the consortium of libraries.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the knowledge and practice of the strategic planning of libraries. The findings of the study are useful for those who seek to achieve cost‐efficiency with the increased and networked cooperation of libraries.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adeyoyin, S.O. (2005), “Strategic planning for marketing library services”, Library Management, Vol. 26 Nos 8/9, pp. 494‐507.

AMKIT Consortimm (2007), AMKIT Consortium, available at: www.amkit.fi/index.php?eng (accessed 8 April 2007).

Bawden, D. (2001), “Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 218‐59.

Breeding, M. (2006), “Reshuffling the deck”, Library Journal, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6319048.html (accessed 9 February 2007).

Bush, T. and Coleman, M. (2000), Leadership and Strategic Management in Education, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Davies, B. and Ellison, L. (2003), The New Strategic Direction and Development of the School, Routledge Falmer, London.

Decker, R. and Höppner, M. (2006), “Strategic planning and customer intelligence in academic libraries”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 504‐14.

Fidler, B. (2002), Strategic Management for School Development, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Frumkin, J. (2004), “The problem of mainstreaming digital libraries”, OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 106‐9.

Gallimore, A. (1999), “Networked public library”, Library Management, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 384‐92.

Guy, F. (2000), “Progress towards the development of digital libraries: the experiences of some national libraries in North America, Australasia and Europe”, Russian Digital Libraries Journal, Vol. 3 No. 3, available at: www.elbib.ru/index.phtml?page = elbib/eng/journal/2000/part3/guy (accessed 9 February 2007).

Huotari, M.‐L. and Iivonen, M. (2005), “Knowledge processes: a strategic foundation for the partnership between the university and its library”, Library Management, Vol. 26 Nos 6/7, pp. 324‐35.

Jin, Y. (2004), “The development of the China networked digital library of theses and dissertations”, Online Information Review, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 367‐70.

Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (2002), Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases, Prentice Hall, Cambridge.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2001), The Strategy‐Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2004), Strategy Maps, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Kettunen, J. (2003), “Strategic evaluation by students in higher education”, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 14‐18.

Kettunen, J. (2004a), “The strategic evaluation of regional development in higher education”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 357‐68.

Kettunen, J. (2004b), “Bridge building to the future of Finnish polytechnics”, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 43‐57.

Kettunen, J. (2005), “Implementation of strategies in continuing education”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 207‐17.

Liu, Y.Q. (2004), “Is the education on digital libraries adequate?”, New Library World, Vol. 105 Nos 1/2, pp. 60‐8.

Lloyd, A. (2003), “Information literacy: the meta‐competency of the knowledge economy? An exploratory paper”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 87‐92.

Nagata, H., Satoh, Y., Gerrard, S. and Kytömäki, P. (2004), “The dimensions that construct the evaluation of service quality in academic libraries”, Performance Measurement & Metrics, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 53‐65.

O'Neil, H.F. Jr, Besimon, E.M., Diamond, M.A. and Moore, M.R. (1999), “Designing and implementing an academic scorecard”, Change, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 32‐40.

Owusu‐Ansah, E.K. (2003), “Information literacy and academic library: a critical look at a concept and the controversies surrounding it”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 219‐30.

Pace, A.K. (2004), “Dismantling integrated library systems”, Library Journal, available at: http://libraryjournal.com/article/CA374953.html (accessed 9 February 2007).

Poll, R. (2001), “Performance measures for library networked services and resources”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 307‐15.

Porter, M. (1996), “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 61‐78, November/December.

Rowley, J. (2005), “Making sense of the quality maze: perspectives for public and academic libraries”, Library Management, Vol. 26 Nos 8/9, pp. 508‐18.

Sharma, R.K. and Vishwanathan, K.R. (2001), “Digital libraries: development and challenges”, Library Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 10‐16.

Tam, L.W.H. (2000), “Quality management theory and practice: some observations of practices in Australian academic libraries”, Library Management, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 349‐56.