The sky is blue, and other reasons quantum mechanics is not underdetermined by evidence
Tóm tắt
I criticize the widely-defended view that the quantum measurement problem is an example of underdetermination of theory by evidence: more specifically, the view that the unmodified, unitary quantum formalism (interpreted following Everett) is empirically indistinguishable from Bohmian Mechanics and from dynamical-collapse theories like the GRW or CSL theories. I argue that there as yet no empirically successful generalization of either theory to interacting quantum field theory and so the apparent underdetermination is broken by a very large class of quantum experiments that require field theory somewhere in their description. The class of quantum experiments reproducible by either is much smaller than is commonly recognized and excludes many of the most iconic successes of quantum mechanics, including the quantitative account of Rayleigh scattering that explains the color of the sky. I respond to various arguments to the contrary in the recent literature.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acuña. (2021). Charting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanics. Synthese, 198, 1711–1740.
Albert, D. Z., & Loewer, B. (1996). Tails of Schrödinger’s Cat. In R. Clifton (Ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality (pp. 81–92). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Allori, V. (2013). Primitive ontology and the structure of fundamental physical theories. In The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 58–75. New York: Oxford University Press.
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2008). On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 353–389.
Arndt, M., Nairz, O., Vos-Andreae, J., Keller, C., van de Zouw, G., & Zeilinger, A. (1999). Wave-particle duality of \(C_{60}\) molecules. Nature, 401, 680–682.
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2005). The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics. In the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2005 edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), available online at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/qm-decoherence
Barrett, J. A. (2003). Are our best physical theories (probably and/or approximately) true? Philosophy of Science, 70, 1206–1218.
Bassi, A., & Ghirardi, G. (2003). Dynamical reduction models. Physics Reports, 379, 257.
Batterman, R. W. (2021). A Middle Way: A Non-Fundamental Approach to Many-Body Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bedingham, D. J. (2010). Relativistic state reduction dynamics. Online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2774
Bedingham, D. J. (2011). Relativistic state reduction model. Online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3974
Bedingham, D., & Pearle, P. (2019). Continuous-spontaneous-localization scalar-field relativistic collapse model. Physical Review Research, 1, 033040.
Bell, J. S. (1982). On the impossible pilot wave. Foundations of Physics 12, 989–99. Reprinted in J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 159–168; page numbers refer to this reprint.
Bell, J. S. (1987). Are there quantum jumps? In C. W. Kilmister (Ed.), Schrödinger: Centenary of a Polymath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp.201–212; page numbers refer to this reprint.
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bricmont, J. (2016). Making Sense of Quantum Mechanics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Brown, H. R., & Wallace, D. (2005). Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett. Foundations of Physics, 35, 517–540.
Callender, C. (2020). Can we quarantine the quantum blight? In S. French & J. Saatsi (Eds.), Scientific Realism and the Quantum (pp. 57–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cordero, A. (1999). Are GRW tails as bad as they say? Philosophy of Science, 66, S59–S71.
Cordero, A. (2001). Realism and underdetermination: Some clues from the practices-up. Philosophy of Science, 68, S301–S312.
Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Maudlin, T., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2006). The message of the quantum? AIP Conference Proceedings, 844, 129.
Deutsch, D. (1996). Comment on Lockwood. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47, 222–228.
Dieks, D. (2017). Underdetermination, realism and objectivity in quantum mechanics. In E. Agazzi (Ed.), Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Switzerland: Springer.
Dürr, D., & Lazarovicki, D. (2020). Understanding Quantum Mechanics: The World According to Modern Quantum Foundations. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghí, N. (2004). Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. Physical Review Letters, 93, 090402.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Struyve, W., & Zanghì, N. (2013). Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 470, 20130699.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (2013). Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Egg, M., & Saatsi, J. (2021). Scientific realism and underdetermination in quantum theory. Philosophy Compass 16, e27773. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12773
Egg, M. (2021). Quantum ontology without speculation. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11, 32.
Esfeld, M., Lazarovici, D., Lam, V., & Hubert, M. (2017). The physics and metaphysics of primitive stuff. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68, 133–161.
Faruqi, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 17, 549–555.
Fraser, D. (2009). Quantum field theory: Underdetermination, inconsistency, and idealization. Philosophy of Science 76, 536–567.
Fraser, D. (2021). Particles in quantum field theory. In E. Knox and A. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. Routledge. Preprint at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20083/
Fraser, D. (2011). How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42, 126–135.
Fraser, J. D. (2020). Towards a realist view of quantum field theory. In S. French & J. Saatsi (Eds.), Scientific Realism and the Quantum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gehrenbeck, R. K. (1978). Electron diffraction: fifty years ago. Physics Today, 31, 34–41.
Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified Dynamics for Micro and Macro Systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470–491.
Goldstein, S. (2017). Bohmian mechanics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/qm-bohm/
Griffiths, D. J., & Schroeter, D. F. (2018). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoefer, C. (2020). Scientific realism without the quantum. In S. French & J. Saatsi (Eds.), Scientific Realism and the Quantum (pp. 19–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Joos, E., Zeh, H. D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D., Kupsch, J., & Stamatescu, I. O. (2003). Decoherence and the Appearence of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (2nd (Edition). Berlin: Springer.
Kuhlmann, M. (2010). Why conceptual rigour matters to philosophy: on the ontological significance of algebraic quantum field theory. Foundations of Physics, 40, 1625001637.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L., & Leplin, J. (1991). Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 449–472.
Lewis, P. (2016). Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loudon, R. (2000). The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyre, H. (2010). Why quantum theory is possibly wrong. Foundations of Physics, 40, 1429–1438.
Maudlin, T. (2013). The nature of the quantum state. In A. Ney & D. Albert (Eds.), The Wave Function (pp. 126–153). Oxford University Press.
Maudlin, T. (2019). Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McQueen, K. J. (2015). Four tails problems for dynamical collapse theories. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 49, 10–18.
Miller, M. (2018). Haag’s theorem, apparent inconsistency, and the empirical adequacy of quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69, 801–820.
Myrvold, W. C. (2002). On peaceful coexistence: is the collapse postulate incompatible with relativity? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 435–466.
Narlikar, J. V., Burbidge, G., & Vishwakarma, R. (2007). Cosmology and cosmogony in a cyclic universe. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 28, 67–99.
Nassau, K. (2001). The Physics and Chemistry of Color: The Fifteen Causes of Color (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Norton, J. (2008). Must evidence underdetermine theory? In M. Carrier, D. Howard, & J. Kourany (Eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited (pp. 17–44). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Pearle, P. (1989). Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization. Physical Review A, 39(5), 2277–2289.
Peurrung, A. (2000). Recent developments in neutron detection. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 443, 400–415.
Rae, A. I. (1992). Quantum Mechanics (3rd ed.). Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.
Rivat, S., & Grinbaum, A. (2020). Philosophical foundations of effective field theories. European Physical Journal, 56, 90.
Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35, 1637. Substantially revised version at arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9609002.
Rovelli, C. (2018). Space is blue and birds fly through it. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2017), 0312.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. New York: Routle.
Saatsi, J. (2020). Truth vs. progress realism about spin. In S. French and J. Saatsi (Eds.), Scientific Realism and the Quantum, pp. 35–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saunders, S. (2021a). The Everett interpretation: probability. In E. Knox and A. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. Routledge. Preprint at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19362/
Saunders, S. (2021b). The Everett interpretation: structure. In E. Knox and A. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. Routledge. Preprint at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18772/
Schlosshauer, M. (2007). Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin: Springer.
Schmidt-Böcking, H., Schmidt, L., Lüdde, H. J., Trageser, W., Templeton, A., & Sauer, T. (2016). The Stern-Gerlach experiment revisited. European Physical Journal H, 41, 327–364.
Shimony, A. (1990). Desiderata for a modified quantum dynamics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990, 49–59.
Struyve, W. (2007). Field beables for quantum field theory. Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.3685
Struyve, W., & Westman, H. (2007). A minimalist pilot-wave model for quantum electrodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 463, 3115–3129.
Tumulka, R. (2006). Collapse and relativity. In A. Bassi, T. Weber, and N. Zanghí (Eds.), Quantum Mechanics: Are There Quantum Jumps? and on the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 340. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings. Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0602208
Valentini, A., & Westman, H. (2004). Dynamical origin of quantum probabilities. Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0403034
von Klitzing, K. (2005). Developments in the quantum Hall effect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 363, 2203–2219.
Wallace, D. (2021). Quantum field theory. In E. Knox and A. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. Routledge. Preprint at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15296/
Wallace, D. (2006). In defence of naiveté: The conceptual status of Lagrangian quantum field theory. Synthese, 151, 33–80.
Wallace, D. (2011). Taking particle physics seriously: a critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42, 116–125.
Wallace, D. (2012). The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, D. (2020). On the plurality of quantum theories: Quantum theory as a framework, and its implications for the quantum measurement problem. In J. Saatsi & S. French (Eds.), Scientific Realism and the Quantum (pp. 78–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, D. (2022). Stating structural realism: mathematics-first approaches to physics and metaphysics. In J. Hawthorne (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives Volume 36: Metaphysics (pp. 345–378). Wiley-Blackwell.
Weatherall, J. O. (forthcoming). The philosophy behind dark matter. Forthcoming.
Weinberg, S. (1986). Superconductivity for particular theorists. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 86, 43–53.
Williams, P. (2015). Naturalness, the autonomy of scales, and the 125 GeV Higgs. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 51, 82–96.
Williams, P. (2019). Scientific realism made effective. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70, 209–237.
Zurek, W. H. (1991). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today 43, 36–44. Revised version available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0306072