The sensitivity of ecosystem service models to choices of input data and spatial resolution

Ancona, 2018 Araujo Barbosa, 2015, Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review, Ecological Indicators, 52, 430, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.007 Arnold, 2005, SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling, Hydrological Processes, 19, 563, 10.1002/hyp.5611 Bagstad, 2013, A comparative assessment of tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation, Ecosystem Services, 5, 27, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004 Bagstad, 2013, Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona, Ecosystem Services, 5, 40, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007 Baveye, 2017, Quantification of ecosystem services: Beyond all the “guesstimates,” how do we get real data?, Ecosystem Services, 24, 47, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.006 Bell, 2000, The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4, 653, 10.5194/hess-4-653-2000 Benítez, 2007, Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications, Ecological Economics, 60, 572, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015 Bennett, 2013, Characterizing performance of environmental models, Environmental Modelling & Software, 40, 1, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 Bockstael, 2000, On measuring economic values for nature, Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 1384, 10.1021/es990673l Burkhard, 2012, Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand, and budgets, Ecological Indicators, 21, 17, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 2017 Caldwell, 2013 Dennedy-Frank, 2016, Comparing two tools for ecosystem service assessments regarding water resource decisions, Journal of Environmental Management, 177, 331, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.012 Dong, 2016, Land use mapping error introduces strongly-localised, scale-dependent uncertainty into land use and ecosystem services modeling, Ecosystem Services, 15, 63, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.006 Eigenbrod, 2010, The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services, Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 377, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x Esri, 2017 Foody, 2015, Valuing map validation: The need for rigorous land cover map accuracy assessment in economic valuations of ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 111, 23, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.003 Geza, 2008, Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions, Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 393, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.016 Grafius, 2016, The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services, Landscape Ecology, 31, 1509, 10.1007/s10980-015-0337-7 Grȇt-Regamey, 2014, On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping, PLoS One, 9, e112601, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112601 Hamel, 2017, Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: Seven challenges and practical responses, Ecosystem Services, 24, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008 Hamel, 2017, Sediment delivery modeling in practice: Comparing the effects of watershed characteristics and data resolution across hydroclimatic regions, The Science of the Total Environment, 580, 1381, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.103 Jackson, 2013, Polyscape: A GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services, Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 74, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.014 Johnson, 2016, Integrating OpenStreetMap crowdsourced data and Landsat time-series imagery for rapid land use/land cover (LULC) mapping: Case study of the Laguna de Bay area of the Philippines, Applied Geography, 67, 140, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.12.006 Kandziora, 2013, Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution, Ecosystem Services, 4, 47, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 Konarska, 2002, Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: A comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and landsat TM datasets, Ecological Economics, 41, 491, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00096-4 Koren, 1999, Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation, Journal of Hydrology, 217, 285, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00231-5 Larondelle, 2016, Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales, Ecosystem Services, 22, 18, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.008 Lüke, 2018, Comparing the applicability of commonly used hydrological ecosystem services models for integrated decision-support, Sustainability, 10 Martin, 2011, Sensitivity of GIS-derived terrain variables at multiple scales for modelling stoat (Mustela erminea) activity, Applied Geography, 31, 770, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.005 Martinez-Harms, 2012, Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services, and Management, 8, 17, 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792 McNulty, 2016, Hydrologic modeling for water resource assessment in a developing country: The Rwanda case study, 181 Medcalf, 2012 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005 Mu Odour, 2016, Land cover mapping for greenhouse gas inventories in Eastern and Southern Africa using Landsat and high resolution imagery: Approach and lessons learnt, 85 Polasky, 2015, Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 7356, 10.1073/pnas.1406490112 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Rabe, 2016, National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales: The German exemplar, Ecological Indicators, 70, 357, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043 Redhead, 2016, Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at the national scale, The Science of the Total Environment, 569–570, 1418, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.227 Rendenieks, 2017, Comparison of input data with different spatial resolution in landscape pattern analysis – a case study from northern Latvia, Applied Geography, 83, 100, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.019 Schröter, 2015, Lessons learned for spatial modeling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting, Ecosystem Services, 13, 64, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.003 Schulp, 2011, Consequences of uncertainty in global-scale land cover maps for mapping ecosystem functions: An analysis of pollination efficiency, Remote Sensing, 3, 2057, 10.3390/rs3092057 Schulp, 2014, Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: A comparison on the European scale, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0109643 Sharps, 2017, Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modeling tools in a diverse UK river catchment, The Science of the Total Environment, 584–585, 118, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160 Sharp Sitch, 2003, Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Change Biology, 9, 161, 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x Sun, 2011, Upscaling key ecosystem functions across the conterminous United States by a water-centric ecosystem model, Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, 10.1029/2010JG001573 Tallis, 2011, How much information do managers need? The sensitivity of ecosystem service decisions to model complexity, 264 UCL-Geomantics United Nations, 2010 United Nations, 2014, European commission, U.N. Food and agriculture organization, organization for economic cooperation and Development, and World Bank Van der Biest, 2015, Evaluation of the accuracy of land-use based ecosystem service assessments for different thematic resolutions, Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 41, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.018 Villa, 2014, A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001 Vogl, 2015 Vorstius, 2015, A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale, Ecosystem Services, 15, 75, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.007 Wang, 2018, Ecosystem services mapping uncertainty assessment: A case study in the Fitzroy Basin mining region, Water, 10 Whitham, 2015, Ecosystem service valuation assessments for protected area management: A case study comparing methods using different land cover classification and valuation approaches, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0129748 Willcock, S., D. A. P. Hooftman, S. Balbi, R. Blanchard, T. Dawson, P. O'Farrell, T. Hickler, M. D. Hudson, M. Lindeskog, J. Martinez-Lopez, M. Mulligan, B. Reyers, K. Schreckenberg, C. Shackleton, N. Sitas, F. Villa, S. M. Watts, F. Eigenbrod, and J. M. Bullock. In press. Continental scale validation of multiple ecosystem service models. Accepted with revisions for: Nature Communications. Willcock, 2016, Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders' needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa, Ecosystem Services, 18, 110, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.038 World Bank, 2017 Yee, 2014, Comparison of methods for quantifying reef ecosystem services: A case study mapping services for St. Croix, USVI, Ecosystem Services, 8, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.001 Zhang, 2016, Geospatial knowledge-based verification and improvement of GlobeLand30, Science China Earth Sciences, 59, 1709, 10.1007/s11430-016-5318-4