The saga of the peer review process: author’s perspective

African Journal of Urology - Tập 27 - Trang 1-2 - 2021
Mayank Agrawal1, Suhani Suhani2
1Department of Urology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ Hospital, Mumbai, India
2Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Tóm tắt

Peer review system is the cornerstone of scientific publishing. The indented process is not as tedious as it has become, mainly due to the time delay, unavailability of expert reviewers, and the callous attitude of some. While there have been articles explaining the whole process and expressing the editor’s viewpoints on the peer review system, we wish to present the author’s perspective on this system.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tullu MS, Karande S (2018) Success in publishing: selecting an appropriate journal and braving the peer-review process. J Postgrad Med 64:1–4 Csiszar A (2016) Peer review: troubled from the start. Nature 532:306–308 Tumin D, Tobias JD (2019) The peer review process. Saudi J Anaesth 13:S52–S58 Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K (2014) Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, & a survival guide. EJIFCC 25:227–243