Vai trò của các nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm trong hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo khu vực: so sánh các mô hình mạng lưới giữa các quỹ đầu tư mạo hiểm tư nhân và các quỹ được công khai hỗ trợ

The Journal of Technology Transfer - Tập 44 - Trang 850-873 - 2017
Yannis Pierrakis1, George Saridakis2
1Kingston Business School, Kingston Hill, UK
2Small Business Research Centre, Kingston Hill, UK

Tóm tắt

Bài báo này thực hiện một nghiên cứu thực nghiệm về sự phát triển của các mạng lưới xã hội giữa các nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm và các chuyên gia khác trong hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo khu vực. Bằng cách sử dụng một khảo sát trực tuyến đối với các nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm, bài viết xem xét hành vi mạng lưới của họ, đặc biệt chú trọng đến sự phân biệt giữa những người làm việc cho các quỹ đầu tư mạo hiểm tư nhân và những người làm việc cho các quỹ được công khai hỗ trợ, cũng như thành phần và sự tìm kiếm không gian trong các mạng lưới của họ. Nó nghiên cứu liệu tần suất tương tác giữa các nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm và các thành viên khác trong hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo có liên quan đến tính chất của các quỹ đầu tư mạo hiểm hay không. Bài báo cung cấp điều tra chi tiết đầu tiên về mối quan hệ giữa các loại nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm khác nhau và các yếu tố khác trong hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo như các vườn ươm đại học, các viện nghiên cứu và các tổ chức hỗ trợ doanh nghiệp. Kết quả cho thấy có sự khác biệt rõ rệt trong hai nhóm nghề nghiệp có vẻ tương tự (nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm tư nhân và công cộng), và sự phụ thuộc vào công của quỹ đầu tư mạo hiểm có mối liên hệ mạnh mẽ và đáng kể với tần suất tương tác cao hơn. Càng phụ thuộc nhiều vào công, thì quỹ càng tương tác nhiều hơn với các yếu tố khác trong hệ thống đổi mới sáng tạo. Phát hiện này có ý nghĩa quan trọng đối với cả các học giả và thực tiễn và gợi ý rằng các quỹ được công khai hỗ trợ có một vai trò lớn hơn trong việc huy động các yếu tố khác trong hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo khu vực.

Từ khóa

#nhà đầu tư mạo hiểm #hệ sinh thái đổi mới sáng tạo #quỹ đầu tư mạo hiểm tư nhân #quỹ được công khai hỗ trợ #mạng lưới xã hội

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baron, R., & Markman, G. (2004). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 106–116. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. Bergemann, D., & Hege, U. (1998). Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 703–735. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 75–111. Buzzacchi, L., Scellato, G., & Ughetto, E. (2013). The investment strategies of publicly sponsored venture capital funds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 707–716. Bygrave, W. B., & Timmons, J. A. (1992). Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Cooke, P. (2001a). Knowledge economies clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. London, New York: Routledge. Cooke, P. (2001b). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. Cooke, P. (2003). Economic globalisation and its future challenges for regional development”. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(2–4), 401–420. Cooke, P., Davies, C., & Wilson, R. (2002). Innovation advantages of cities: From knowledge to equity in five basic steps. European Planning Studies, 102, 233–250. Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1994). The creative milieu: A regional perspective on innovation. In M. Dodgson & R. Rothwell (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1998). The associational economy: Firms, regions, and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Florida, R. (1995). Towards the learning region. Futures, 275, 527–536. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23(3), 28–37. Fritsch, M., & Schilder, D. (2008). Does venture capital investment really require spatial proximity? An Empirical Investigation, Environment and Planning A, 40(9), 2114–2131. Gompers, P. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50, 1461–1489. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 152, 145–168. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215. Gupta, A. K., & Sapienza, H. (1992). Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 75, 347–362. Hellman, T. (1998). The allocation of control rights in venture capital contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 29(1), 57–76. Hochberg, Y., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62, 251–301. Kanniainen, V., & Keuschnigg, C. (2004). Start-up investment with scarce venture capital support. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 1935–1959. Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315. Kenney, M., & Florida, R. (2000). Venture capital in Silicon Valley: Fuelling new firm formation. In M. Kenny (Ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region (pp. 98–123). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Landabaso, M., Oughton, C., & Morgan, K. (2001). Innovation networks and regional policy in Europe. In K. Koschatzy, M. Kulicke, & A. Zenker (Eds.), Innovation networks: Concepts and challenges in the European perspective (pp. 243–273). Heidelberg: Physica. Lerner, J. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23, 16–27. Lerner, J. (1995). Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics, 382, 463–495. Lerner, J. (2002). When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective ‘‘public venture capital’’ programmes. Economic Journal, 1(12477), F73–F84. Lin, T. H. (1996). The certification role of large block shareholders in initial public offerings: The case of venture capitalists. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(2), 55–65. Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42, 43–53. Lundvall, B. (1996). The social dimension of the learning economy. DRUID working papers 96-1, DRUID. Lundvall, B. Å. (2001). Innovation policy in the globalizing learning economy. In Globalising learning economy (pp. 273–291). Oxford University Press. Lutz, E., Bender, M., Achleitner, A. K., & Kaserer, C. (2013). Importance of spatial proximity between venture capital investors and investees in Germany. Journal of Business Research, 6611, 2346–2354. Mäkelä, M., & Maula, M. (2008). Attracting cross-border venture capital: The role of a local investor. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(3), 237–257. Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. Martin, R., Berndt, C., Klagge, B., & Sunley, P. (2005). Spatial proximity effects and regional equity gaps in the venture capital market: Evidence from Germany and the UK. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1207–1231. Mason, C. (1987). Venture capital in the United Kingdom: A geographical perspective. National Westminster Quarterly Review, 2, 47–58. Mason, C. M. (2007). Venture capital: A geographical perspective. In H. Landström (Ed.), Handbook of research on venture capital (pp. 86–112). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2002). Barriers to investment in the informal venture capital market. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14, 271–297. Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2003). Closing the regional equity gap? A critique of the department of trade and industry’s regional venture capital funds initiative. Regional Studies, 37(8), 855–868. Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2008). Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: A review of potential data sources. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10, 309–330. Mason, C., & Pierrakis, Y. (2013). Venture capital, the regions and public policy: The United Kingdom since the post-2000 technology crash. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1156–1171. Mondher, C., & Sana, E. (2009). Venture capital financing: A theoretical model. University of Reims OMI-LAME, ISG-Sousse. Morgan, K., & Nauwelaers, C. (1999). The new wave of innovation-oriented regional policies: Retrospects and prospects. In K. Morgan, & C. Nauwelaers (Eds.). Regional innovation strategies. The challenge for less-favoured regions policy series (pp. 224–237). The Stationery Office. Regional Studies Association. Mueller, C., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2012). Formal venture capital acquisition: Can entrepreneurs compensate for the spatial proximity benefits of South East England and ‘star’ golden-triangle universities? Environment and Planning A, 44, 281–296. Munari, F., & Toschi, L. (2010). Assessing the impact of public venture capital programmes in the UK: Do regional characteristics matter? Department of Management, Università degli Studi di Bologna. NAO. (2009). Venture capital support to small businesses. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Nielsen, P., & Lundvall, B. (2003). Innovation, learning organizations and industrial relations. DRUID working papers 03-07, DRUID. Nightingale, P., Murray, G., Cowling, M., Baden-Fuller, C., Mason, C., Siepel, J., et al. (2009). From funding gaps to thin markets: UK government support for early-stage venture capital. London: Nesta. Norton, E., & Tenenbaum, B. (1993). Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy”. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 431–442. Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (1999, November 18). Innovation networks and regional policy in Europe, Karlsruhe. Pierrakis, Y., & Saridakis, G. (2017). Do publicly backed venture capital investments promote innovation? Differences between privately and publicly backed funds in the UK venture capital market. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 55–64. Pierrakis, Y., & Westlake, S. (2009). Reshaping the UK Economy: The role of public investment in financing growth. Project Report. London, UK: NESTA. Pinch, S., & Sunley, P. (2009). Understanding the role of venture capitalists in knowledge dissemination in technology agglomerations: A case study of the University of Southampton spin-off cluster. Venture Capital, 11(4), 311–333. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93. Porter, M. (1994). The role of location in competition. Journal of Economics of Business, I(1), 35–39. Porter, M. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomerative economics and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1 and 2), 85–94. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90. Porter, M. (2000a). Location, clusters, and company strategy. In G. Clark, M. Gertler, & M. Feldman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Porter, M. (2000b). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34. Powell, W., Koput, K., Bowie, J., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2002). The spatial clustering of science and capital: Accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships’. Regional Studies, 36(3), 291–305. Rosenberg, D. (2002). Cloning Silicon Valley: The next generation high tech hotspots. London: Pearson. Sapienza, H., & Amason, A. (1993). Effects of innovativeness and venture stage on venture capitalist-entrepreneur relations. Interfaces, 23(6), 38–51. Sapienza, H., & Gupta, A. (1994). Impact of agency risks and task uncertainly on venture capitalists—CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1618–1632. Saxenian, A., & Sabel, C. (2008). Roepke lecture in economic geography venture capital in the ‘periphery’: The new argonauts. Global Search, and Local Institution Building, Economic Geography, 84(4), 379–394. Schäfer, D., & Schilder, D. (2009). Smart capital in German start-ups: An empirical analysis. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 11(2), 163–183. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector (1st ed.). London: Routledge. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588. Sunley, P., Klagge, B., Berndit, C., & Ron, M. (2005). Venture capital programmes in the UK and Germany: In what sense regional policies? Regional Studies, 39(2), 255–273. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3(1), 119–138. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Wiltbank, R. E. (2009). Siding with the Angels: Business Angel investing-promising outcomes and effective strategies. Nesta. Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics (5th ed.). Nashville: South-Western. Zook, M. A. (2000). Grounded capital: Venture capital’s role in the clustering of internet firms in the US. Paper presented to Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference, Atlanta. Zook, M. A. (2004). The knowledge brokers: Venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 621–641.