The role of structural change in labour productivity convergence among European Union countries: 1970‐1990

Emerald - Tập 26 Số 2 - Trang 106-122 - 1999
EleanorDoyle1, EoinO’Leary1
1Department of Economics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Tóm tắt

New evidence is presented on the degree of aggregate and sectoral labour productivity convergence among 11 EU countries between 1970 and 1990. As with studies for other groups of countries, it is found that there is a greater degree of aggregate than sectoral convergence. Aggregate productivity converged at 0.9 percent per annum, with agriculture and manufacturing both diverging and only services converging (0.6 percent p.a.). We contend that structural change provides one explanation for this finding. When measured as changes in sectoral employment shares, structural change accounted for between 50 percent and 66 percent of the overall rate of aggregate productivity convergence among the EU countries over the period. Countries with relatively low levels of aggregate productivity benefited most from structural change.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abramovitz, M. (1986), “Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind”, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 385‐406.

Barro, R. and Sala‐i‐Martin, X. (1991), “Convergence across states and regions”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 107‐82.

Barro, R. and Sala‐i‐Martin, X. (1992), “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100 No. 2, pp. 223‐51.

Barro, R. (1991), “Economic growth in a cross section of countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CVI No. 2, pp. 407‐43.

Baumol, W.J. (1986), “Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: what the long run data show”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 1073‐85.

Baumol, W.J., Blackman, A. and Wolff, N. (1989), Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Ben‐David, D. (1993), “Equalizing exchange: trade liberalization and income convergence”, The Quarterly Journal of Economic,Vol. 108 No. 3, pp. 653‐79.

Bernard, A.B. and Jones, C.I. (1996), “Comparing apples to oranges: productivity convergence and measurement across industries and countries”, American Economic Review, Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 1216‐38.

Central Statistics Office, Ireland, National Income and Expenditure Accounts, Various Issues, Stationery Office, Dublin.

De Long, J. (1988), “Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: comment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 78 No. 5, pp. 1138‐59.

Department of Finance, Ireland, Economic Review and Outlook, Various Issues, Stationary Office, Dublin.

Dollar, D. and Wolff, E. (1988), “Convergence of industry labour productivity among advanced economies, 1963‐1982”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. LXX No. 4, pp. 549‐58.

Dollar, D. and Wolff, E. (1993), Competitiveness, Convergence and Internal Specialization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Dowrick, S. (1989), “Sectoral change, catching up and slowing down”, Economic Letters, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 331‐5.

Dowrick, S. and Nguyen, D.T. (1989), “OECD comparative economic growth 1950‐85: catch‐up and convergence”, American Economic Review, Vol. 79 No. 5, pp. 1013‐30.

Doyle, E. (1997), “Structural change in Ireland: the contribution of sectoral employment distribution to labour productivity convergence between Ireland and the EU: 1970‐1990”, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 24 Nos 1/2, pp. 59‐71.

Friedman, M. (1992), “Do old fallacies ever die?”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXX No. 4, pp. 2129‐32.

Hotelling, H. (1933), Review of “The triumph of mediocrity in business’, by Horace Secrist”, Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 28 No. 184, pp. 463‐5.

ILO, Yearbook of Labour Statistics, Various Issues, ILO, Geneva.

Kennedy, K.A. (1992), Real convergence, the European community and Ireland”, Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, Vol. XXVI No. IV, pp. 213‐68.

Kennedy, K.A. (1971), Productivity and Industrial Growth: The Irish Experience, Oxford University Press, London.

Meyer‐zu‐Schlochtern, F.J.M. (1988), “An international sectoral database for 13 OECD countries”, OECD Department of Economics and Statistics, Working Paper No. 90, OECD, Paris.

OECD (1993), International Sectoral Database, 1993 Version, OECD, Paris.

OECD, OECD National Accounts, Various Issues, OECD, Paris.

O’Leary, E. (1995), Productivity Convergence: A Study of European Union Countries at the Aggregate, Sectoral and Industry Levels, 1960‐1990, PhD Dissertation, National University of Ireland.

O’Leary, E. (1997), “The convergence performance of Ireland among EU countries: 1960 to 1990”, Journal of Economic Studies , Vol. 24 Nos 1/2, pp. 43‐58.

Quah, D. (1993), “Galton’s fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95 No. 4, pp. 427‐33.

Rowthorn, R.E. (1992), Productivity and American leadership’’, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 475‐96.

SOEC, National Accounts ESA, Various issues, SOEC, Luxembourg.

SOEC, Labour Force Sample Survey, Various issues, SOEC, Luxembourg.

Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991), “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an expanded set of international comparisons, 1950‐1988”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CVI No. 2, pp. 327‐68.

UN Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, Various Issues, UN, New York, NY.

Van Ark, B. (1995), “Sectoral growth accounting and structural change in postwar Europe”, in Van Ark, B. and Crafts, N.F.R. (Eds), Quantitative Aspects of European Postwar Growth, CEPR, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wolff, E.E. (1991), “Capital formation and productivity convergence over the long term”, American Economic Review, Vol. 81 No. 9, pp. 565‐79.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 26 Số 2

106-122

Thông tin tác giả