The role of political partisanship during economic crises
Tóm tắt
Major economic crises may promote structural reforms, by increasing the cost of the status quo, or hinder them, by inducing more demand for protection. The ideology and political partisanship of the ruling government may be crucial in determining the prevailing course of action. In good times, conservative parties are typically pro-reform. However, do these parties try to exploit periods of crisis to carry out their reforms? Do social-democratic parties support even greater social protection? To answer these questions, this paper uses indicators of structural reforms in the labor, product, and financial markets for 25 OECD countries over the 1975–2008 period. The empirical analysis confirms the ambiguous effect of crises: product markets are liberalized, but financial markets become more regulated. Partisan politics also matters, as right parties are associated with more pro-market reforms. Yet, crises modify partisan politics: right-wing parties refrain from promoting privatizations, and oppose the introduction of greater financial market regulations. By contrast, center parties liberalize and trim unemployment benefits generosity, while left parties privatize. Furthermore, weak, fractionalized governments, which are associated with more regulated product markets, are also more likely to liberalize during a crisis.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abiad, A., Detragiache, E., & Tressel, T. (2008). A new database of financial reforms (IMF Working Papers 08/266).
Abiad, A., & Mody, A. (2005). Financial reform: what shakes it? What shapes it? American Economic Review, 95(1), 66–88.
Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496–512.
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Trebbi, F. (2006). Who adjusts and when? The political economy of reforms. IMF Staff Papers, 53, 1–29.
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Galasso, V. (2009). The euro and structural reforms. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Europe and the Euro, 2009. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER.
Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? American Economic Review, 81(December), 1170–1188.
Bean, C.R. (1998). The interaction of aggregate-demand policies and labour market reform. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5(2), 353–382.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634–647.
Beck, T., George, C., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165–176.
Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality. Conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, S. M., & Kurtz, M. J. (2007). Capital, trade, and the political economies of reform. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 703–720.
Buti, M., Turrini, A., van den Noord, P., & Biroli, P. (2008). Defying the Juncker Curse: can reformist governments be re-elected? European economy economic papers, 324.
Congleton, R. D. (2009). On the political economy of the financial crisis and bailout of 2008–09. Public Choice, 140, 287–317.
Congleton, R. D. (2012). On the political economy and limits of crisis insurance: the case of the 2008–11 bailouts. Public Choice, 150, 399–423.
Conway, P., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: measurement and highlights (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 530).
Cukierman, A., & Tommasi, M. (1998). When does it take a Nixon to go to China? American Economic Review, 88, 180–197.
Drazen, A. (2000). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Drazen, A., & Easterly, W. (2001). Do crises induce reform? Simple empirical tests of conventional wisdom. Economics and Politics, 13(2), 129–157.
Drazen, A., & Grilli, V. (1993). The benefits of crisis for economic reform. American Economic Review, 83(3), 598–607.
Duval, R. (2004). Retirement behaviour in OECD countries: impact of old-age pension schemes and other social transfer programmes (OECD Economic Studies, No. 37).
Duval, R., & Elmeskov, J. (2005). The effects of EMU on structural reform in labour and product markets (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 438).
Edwards, S. (1995). Crisis and reform in Latin America: from despair to hope. London: Oxford University Press and World Bank.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Polity Press/Princeton University Press.
Fernandez, R., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: status-quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review, 81, 1146–1155.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1992). The politics of economic adjustment: international constraints, distributive conflicts and the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and Leviathan. New York: Oxford.
Høj, J., Dang, T. T., Galasso, V., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). The political economy of structural reform: empirical evidence from OECD countries (OECD Eco Working Paper, 7/2006).
IMF (2004). Fostering structural reforms in industrial countries. World Economic Outlook.
Laban, R., & Sturzenegger, F. (1994). Distributional conflicts, financial adaptation and delayed stabilizations. Economics and Politics, 6, 257–276.
Mulligan, C., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1999). Gerontocracy, retirement, and social security (NBER Working Paper No. W7117).
Murillo, M. V. (2009). Political competition, partisanship, and policy making in Latin American public utilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murillo, M. V., & Martinez-Gallardo, C. (2007). Political competition and policy adoption: market reforms in Latin America public utility. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 120–139.
Nelson, J. (1990). Economic crisis and policy choice: the politics of adjustment in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, J. (1994). The political economy of policy reform: panel discussion. In Williamson, J. (Ed.), The political economy of policy reform (pp. 472–477). Washington: Institute for International Economics.
Nielson, D. (2003). Supplying trade reform: political institutions and liberalization in middle income presidential democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 470–491.
Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2005). Product market reforms and employment in the OECD countries (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 472).
Obstfeld, M. (1997). Europe’s gamble. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
OECD (2006). OECD jobs strategy: lessons from a decade’s experience (Main Report, No. 2).
OECD Benefits and Wages database
OECD Employment Outlook (2004)
Perotti, R. (1999). Fiscal policy in good times and bad. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1399–1436.
Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2008). Do parties matter for economic outcomes: a regression-discontinuity approach. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1037–1056.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pop-Eleches, G. (2008). Crisis in the eye of the beholder: economic crisis and partisan politics in Latin America and East European international monetary fund programs. Comparative Political Studies, 41(9), 1179–1211.
Profeta, P. (2002). Retirement and social security in a probabilistic voting model. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 331–348.
Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 5–50.
Rodrik, D. (1996). Understanding economic policy reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 9–41.
Saint-Paul, G., & Bentolila, S. (2000). Will EMU increase eurosclerosis (CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 2423).
Shughart, W. F. (2011). The new deal and modern memory. Southern Economic Journal, 77(3), 515–542.
Stokes, S. (2001). Mandates and democracy: neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stromberg, D. (2008). How the electoral college influences campaigns and policy: the probability of being Florida. American Economic Review, 98(3), 769–807.
Tompson, W. (2009). Advancing structural reforms in OECD countries: lessons from twenty case studies (Working Party No. 1 on Macroeconomic and Structural Policy Analysis).
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weyland, K. (2002). The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.