The role of policy instruments on deployment of carbon capture, storage and utilization technologies: A case study in Türkiye

Babkir, A. et al. (2023) ‘Sustainability assessment of alternative energy power generation pathways through the development of impact indicators for water, land, GHG emissions, and cost’, 171(113030). 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113030. Bassi, S. et al. (2015) ‘Bridging the gap: improving the economic and policy framework for carbon capture and storage in the European Union’, (June), pp. 1–76. Available at: http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/briding the gap.pdf. Behzadian, 2012, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 13051, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 BEIS (2019) Business models for carbon capture, usage and storage. Denscombe, M. (2014) The Good Research guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. Maidenhead, Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education. Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=SMovEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=The+good+research+guide.+Denscombe,+&ots=lL9dUjY5jg&sig=zqRSF9A_4NCKVfGgbao-6ca0Qzk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The good research guide. Denscombe%2C&f=false. Difiglio, C., Guray, B.S. and Merdan, E. (2020) Türkiye Energy Outlook, Istanbul International Centre for Energy and Climate (IICEC). Istanbul: Sabanci University. Available at: https://iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/files/inline-files/TEO.pdf. Mac Dowell, 2017, The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 243, 10.1038/nclimate3231 2018, Industrial carbon capture business models’, the department for business, Energy Ind. Strategy, 102 Element Energy and Vivid Economics (2018) Policy mechanisms to support the largescale deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Available at: http://www.hse.gov/uk/carboncapture/index.htm. Esmaeili, D. (2018) Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in the Context of Turkish Energy Market. Istanbul. Available at: https://iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/files/1806 IICECE%26CPaperCCUSinTürkiye_0.pdf. 2018, A Clean Planet for all. A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, Com, 773 European Commission (2021) Study on the possibility to set up a carbon border adjustment mechanism on selected sectors. 2018 GCCSI (2020) ‘Global Status of CCS 2020′, Global CCS Institute, (June). Available at: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/. Health and Environment Alliance (2021) Türkiye'de kronik kömür kirliliği [Chronic Coal Pollution in Türkiye]. Available at: https://www.env-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Chronic-Coal-Pollution-Türkiye-TR.pdf. Heesh, 2021, Low carbon policy and market mechanisms to enable carbon capture and storage and decarbonisation in Australia, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 105 Hwang, 1981, Methods for multiple attribute decision making 2012 IEA (2020) Energy technology perspectives 2020 - special report on carbon capture utilisation and storage, energy technology perspectives 2020 - special report on carbon capture utilisation and storage. doi: 10.1787/208b66f4-en. IEA (2021a) Is carbon capture too expensive?, IEA. Available at: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive (Accessed: 5 August 2021). IEA (2021b) ‘Net zero by 2050 a roadmap for the’, p. 222. Available at: www.iea.org/t&c/no need for. IEA (2021c) Policies database. Available at: https://www.iea.org/policies?country=Türkiye&D&D&D (Accessed: 18 August 2021). 2021, Türkiye 2021, Energy Policy Rev. Jamshed, 2014, Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation, J. Basic Clin. Pharm., 5, 87, 10.4103/0976-0105.141942 Johansson, 2018, Towards zero carbon emissions - climate policy instruments for energy intensive industries, materials and products, Eceee Industrial Summer Study Proceedings, 33 Kaya, 2011, Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 6577, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081 Krahé, 2013, From demonstration to deployment: an economic analysis of support policies for carbon capture and storage, Energy Policy, 60, 753, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.019 Krupnick, 2012, What is the best policy instrument for reducing CO2 emissions? Ku, 2020, Cross-regional drivers for CCUS deployment, Clean Energy, 4, 202, 10.1093/ce/zkaa008 Li, H. (2019) An Overview of Worldwide Large-Scale CCS Deployment: A Focus On Current Status and Regional Summary. Imperial College London. Muslemani, 2020, Business models for carbon capture, utilization and storage technologies in the steel sector: a qualitative multi-method study, Processes, 8, 1, 10.3390/pr8050576 Napp, 2014, Attitudes and barriers to deployment of CCS from industrial sources in the UK, Grantham Report GR6 OECD (2019) OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Türkiye 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: doi.org/10.1787/9789264309753-en. Papapostolou, 2017, Analysis of policy scenarios for achieving renewable energy sources targets: a fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Energy Environ., 28, 88, 10.1177/0958305X16685474 Paul, 2014, The Attractiveness of CEE countries for FDI: a public policy approach using the TOPSIS method, Transylvanian Rev. Administr. Sci., 156 Ritchie, H. and Roser, M. (2020) CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, OurWorldInData.org.Bull Trimest Plan FamAvailable at: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions (Accessed: 5 August 2021). Robinson, 2014, Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide, Qual. Res. Psychol., 11, 25, 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 Romasheva, 2019, CCS projects: how regulatory framework influences their deployment, Resources, 8, 10.3390/resources8040181 Sanlı, B. (2020) Türkiye ’ de Konut Enerji Tüketimlerinin ve Faturaların Mevsimselliği [Seasonality of household electricity bills and consumptions in Türkiye]. Available at: http://web2.bilkent.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2020/10/30-Türkiyede-Konut-Enerji-Tüketimlerinin-ve-Faturaların-Mevsimselliği.pdf. Şengül, 2015, Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Türkiye, Renew. Energy, 75, 617, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045 Shackley, 2007, Stakeholder perceptions of CO2 capture and storage in Europe : results from a survey, Energy Policy, 35, 5091, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.001 Shih, 2007, An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Math. Comput. Model., 45, 801, 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023 Strantzali, 2016, Decision making in renewable energy investments: a review, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 55, 885, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021 Streimikiene, 2012, Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 16, 3302, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.067 Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2021) PMR Türkiye. Available at: https://pmrturkiye.csb.gov.tr/pmr-Türkiye/?lang=en (Accessed: 18 August 2021). 2021 Üçtuğ, 2015, Multi-criteria decision making-based comparison of power source technologies for utilization in automobiles, J. Clean Energy Technol., 3, 212, 10.7763/JOCET.2015.V3.197 2017, Household size and composition around the world, Data Booklet, 2, 4 Velasquez, 2013, An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods, Int. J. Oper. Res., 10, 56 Vivid Economics (2020) ‘Bulletin prepared for the Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation of Türkiye’, pp. 1–7. Available at: https://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/TurkSim-Bulletin-Workshop-1.pdf. WEC Turkish National Committee (2018) Surveys. Available at: https://www.worldenergy.org.tr/surveys/. Yanagi, 2019, Policy instrument options for commercialising carbon capture and storage (CCS) in Japan, MEIJI Law J., 17 Yeldan, E., Aşıcı, A.A. and Acar, S. (2020) The new climate regime through the lens of economic indicator. Zapantis, 2019 Zero (2013) Policy Instruments For Large-Scale CCS. Oslo. Zhong, J., and Pei, J. (2022) ‘Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism’, 162(112802). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802.