The role of organizational culture for grounding, management, guidance and effectiveness of enterprise architecture principles
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aier S, Gleichauf B (2010) Application of enterprise models for engineering enterprise transformation. Enterp Model Inf Syst Archit 5(1):58–75
Aier S, Weiss S (2012) An institutional framework for analyzing organizational responses to the establishment of architectural transformation. In: Proceedings of the 20th European conference on information systems, Barcelona
Aier S, Riege C, Winter R (2008) Classification of enterprise architecture scenarios—an exploratory analysis. Enterp Model Inf Syst Archit 3(1):14–23
Aier S, Fischer C, Winter R (2011a) Construction and evaluation of a meta-model for enterprise architecture design principles. In: Bernstein A, Schwabe G (eds) The 10th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik WI 2.011, Zurich, pp 637–644
Aier S, Gleichauf B, Winter R (2011b) Understanding enterprise architecture management design—an empirical analysis. In: Bernstein A, Schwabe G (ed) The 10th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik WI 2.011, Zurich, pp 645–654
Armour FJ, Kaisler SH, Liu SY (1999) A big-picture look at enterprise architectures. IEEE IT Prof 1(1/2):35–42
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(1):1173–1182
Baskerville RL, Pries-Heje J, Venable J (2007) Soft design science research: extending the boundaries of evaluation in design science research. In: Proceedings of DESRIST 2007
Boh WF, Yellin D (2007) Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. J Manag Inf Syst 23(3):163–207
Boucharas V, van Steenbergen M, Jansen S, Brinkkemper S (2010) The contribution of enterprise architecture to the achievement of organizational goals: establishing the enterprise architecture benefits framework. Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht
Brown CV (1997) Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: evidence from a single case site. Inf Syst Res 8(1):69–94
Brown AE, Grant GG (2005) Framing the frameworks: a review of IT governance research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15(May):696–712
Brown CV, Magill SL (1994) Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Q 18(4):371–403
Brown CV, Magill SL (1998) Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organ Sci 9(2):176–194
Bucher T, Fischer R, Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2006) Analysis and application scenarios of enterprise architecture—an exploratory study. In: Society IC (ed) EDOC workshop on trends in enterprise architecture research (TEAR 2006), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Buckl S, Ernst AM, Matthes F, Schweda CM (2009) An information model for landscape management—discussing temporality aspects. In: Feuerlicht G, Lamersdorf W (eds) Service-oriented computing—ICSOC 2008 workshops. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–374
Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London
Cameron KS (1985) Cultural congruence strength and type: relationships to effectiveness. University of Michigan, Michigan
Cameron KS (1986) Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Manage Sci 32(5):539–553
Cameron KS, Freeman SJ (1991) Cultural congruence, strength, and type: relationships to effectiveness. Res Organ Chang Dev 5:23–58
Chen D, Lillehagen F (2004) Enterprise architectures—review on concepts, principles and approaches. In: Sobolewski MW, Cha J (ed) 10th international conference on concurrent engineering (ISPE CE 2004). Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp 1211–1216
Chin WW (1998a) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q 22(1):vii–xvi
Chin WW (1998b) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 295–336
Chin WW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J et al (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Concepts, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 655–690
Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res 14(2):189–217
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Cooke RA, Rousseau DM (1988) Behavioral norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group Organ Stud 13(3):245–273
DeLong DW, Fahey L (2000) Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Acad Manag Executive 14(4):113–127
Denison DR, Spreitzer GM (1991) Organizational culture and organizational development: a competing values approach. Res Organ Chang Dev 5:1–21
Detert JR, Schroeder RG, Mauriel JJ (2000) Architecture principles—the cornerstones of enterprise architecture. Acad Manag J 25(4):850–863
Dietz JLG (2007) Architecture. Building strategy into design. Academic Service, The Hague
Drazin R, Van de Ven AH (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Adm Sci Q 30(4):514–539
Ein-Dor P, Segev E (1978) Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Manage Sci 24(10):1064–1077
Ein-Dor P, Segev E (1982) Organizational context and MIS structure: some empirical evidence. MIS Q 6(3):55–68
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191
Fischer C, Winter R, Aier S (2010) What is an enterprise architecture design principle? towards a consolidated definition. In: Lee R (ed) Computer and information science 2010. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–205
Foorthuis R, van Steenbergen M, Mushkudiani N, Bruls W, Brinkkemper S, Bos R (2010) On course, but not there yet: enterprise architecture conformance and benefits in systems development. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 110
Goodhue DL, Lewis W, Thompson R (2007) Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Inf Syst Res 18(2):211–227
Götz O, Liehr-Gobbers K, Krafft M (2010) Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J et al (eds) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts. Methods and Applications, Springer, pp 691–711
Greefhorst D, Proper E (2011) Architecture principles—the cornerstones of enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin
Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(5):312–335
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon, Boston
Henderson JC, Venkatraman N (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J 32(1):4–16
Henseler J, Fassott G (2010) Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. In: Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J et al (eds) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Methods and Applications, Springer, pp 713–735
Hofstede G (1998) Identifying organizational subcultures: an empirical approach. J Manage Stud 35(1):1–12
Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Ohayv DD, Sanders G (1990) Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Adm Sci Q 35(2):286–316
Hoogervorst JAP (2004) Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change. Int J Co-op Inf Syst 13(3):213–233
Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J 20(2):195–204
IEEE (2000) IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems (IEEE Std 1471-2000). IEEE Computer Society, New York
Iivari J, Huisman M (2007) The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies. MIS Q 31(1):35–58
Jones MC, Cline M, Ryan S (2006) Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP implementation: an organizational culture framework. Decis Support Syst 41(2):411–434
Jonkers H, Lankhorst MM, Doest HWL, Arbab F, Bosma H, Wieringa RJ (2006) Enterprise architecture: management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Inf Syst Frontiers 8:63–66
Kroeber AL, Kluckhohn C (1952) Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. The Museum, Cambridge
Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2007) Viewpoint-based meta model engineering. In: Reichert M, Strecker S, Turowski K (ed) Enterprise modelling and information systems architectures—concepts and applications, proceedings of the 2nd international workshop EMISA 2007, Gesellschaft für Informatik, Köllen, Bonn, pp 143–161
Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2009) Concern-oriented business architecture engineering. In: Shin D (ed) Applied computing 2009—the 24th annual ACM symposium on applied computing, ACM, pp 265–272
Lagerström R, Saat J, Franke U, Aier S, Ekstedt M (2009) Enterprise meta modeling methods—combining a stakeholder-oriented and a causality-based approach. In: Halpin T, Krogstie J, Nurcan S et al. (eds) Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling, proceedings of the 10th international workshop BPMDS and 14th international conference EMMSAD at CAiSE 2009. Springer, Berlin, pp 381–393
Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work: modelling, communication and analysis. Springer, Berlin
Leidner DE, Kayworth T (2006) A review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Q 30(2):357–399
Leppänen M, Valtonen K, Pulkkinen M (2007) Towards a contingency framework for engineering an enterprise architecture planning method. In: Proceedings of 30th information systems research seminar in scandinavia (IRIS 2007)
Lindström Å (2006) On the syntax and semantics of architectural principles. In: Sprague RH Jr (ed) 39th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Martinez JI, Jarillo JC (1989) The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. J Int Bus Stud 20(3):489–514
Mykhashchuk M, Buckl S, Dierl T, Schweda CM (2011) Charting the landscape of enterprise architecture management. In: Bernstein A, Schwabe G (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik WI 2.011, Zurich, pp 570–577
Niemann KD (2006) From enterprise architecture to IT governance. Elements of effective IT management. Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Niemi E (2007) Enterprise architecture stakeholders—a holistic view. In: 13th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS 2007), Keystone, CO
Olson MH, Chervany NL (1980) The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services function. MIS Q 4(2):57–68
Op’t Land M, Proper E, Waage M, Cloo J, Steghuis C (2009) Enterprise architecture—creating value by informed governance. Springer, Berlin
Proper E, Greefhorst D (2010) The roles of principles in enterprise architecture. In: Proper E, Lankhorst MM, Schönherr M et al (eds) 5th International workshop on trends in enterprise architecture research (TEAR 2010). Springer, Berlin, pp 57–70
Quinn RE (1984) Applying the competing values approach to leadership. In: Hunt JG, Stewart R, Schriesheim CA et al (eds) Managerial work and leadership: international perspectives. Pergamon, New York, pp 10–27
Quinn RE (1988) Beyond rational management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Quinn RE, Cameron KS (1983) Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Manage Sci 29(1):33–51
Quinn RE, Hall RH (1983) Environments, organizations, and policymakers: toward an integrative framework. In: Hall RH, Quinn RE (eds) Organizational theory and public policy. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 281–298
Quinn RE, Kimberly JR (1984) Paradox, planning, and perseverance: guidelines for managerial practice. In: Kimberly JR, Quinn RE (eds) Managing organizational transitions. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, pp 295–313
Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1981) A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Prod Rev 5(2):122–140
Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29(3):363–377
Ralyté J, Brinkkemper S, Henderson-Sellers B (ed) (2007) Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 working conference on situational method engineering—fundamentals and experiences (ME07). Springer, Boston
Richardson GL, Jackson BM, Dickson GW (1990) A principle-based enterprise architecture: lessons from Texaco and Star enterprise. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst 14(4):285–403
Ringle C, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). University of Hamburg, Hamburg
Ross JW (2006) Enterprise architecture: driving business benefits from IT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Information Systems Research (CISR), p 359
Sackmann SA (1992) Culture and subcultures: an analysis of organizational knowledge. Adm Sci Q 37(1):140–161
Sambamurthy V, Zmud RW (1999) Arrangements for information technology governance: a theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Q 23(2):261–290
Schein EH (1997) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Schelp J, Winter R (2009) Language communities in enterprise architecture research. In: Vaishanvi V, Baskerville R (eds) Diversity in design science—4th conference on design science research in information systems and technologies (DESRIST2009). ACM, Philadelphia, pp 1–10
Schmidt C, Buxmann P (2011) Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry. Eur J Inf Syst 20(2):168–185
Schönherr M (2009) Towards a common terminology in the discipline of enterprise architecture. In: Feuerlicht G, Lamersdorf W (eds) Service-oriented computing—ICSOC 2008 workshops. Springer, Sydney, pp 400–413
Scott WR (2001) Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications, London
Sein M, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Q 35(1):37–56
Stelzer D (2010) Enterprise architecture principles: literature review and research directions. In: Dan A, Gittler F, Toumani F (ed) Service-oriented computing. ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009 international workshops, Stockholm, Sweden, November 23–27, 2009, Revised Selected Papers, Springer, Berlin, pp 12–21
Tamm T, Seddon PB, Shanks G, Reynolds P (2011) How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Commun Assoc Inf Syst 28:141–168
The Open Group (2009) TOGAF version 9—The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). The Open Group
Tosi HL Jr, Slocum JW Jr (1984) Contingency theory: some suggested directions. J Manag 10(1):9–26
van den Berg M, van Steenbergen M (2006) Building an enterprise architecture practice: tools, tips, best practices, ready-to-use insights. Springer, Berlin
van Steenbergen M (2011) Maturity and effectiveness of enterprise architecture. Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht
Wagter R, van den Berg M, Luijpers J, van Steenbergen M (2005) Dynamic enterprise architecture: how to make it work. Wiley, Hoboken
Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26(2):13–23
Weill P (2004) Don’t just lead, govern: how top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Q Executive 3(1):1–17
Weill P, Ross JW (2004) IT governance—how top performers manage IT. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Weill P, Ross JW (2005) A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46(2):25–34
Winter R, Fischer R (2007) Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. J Enterp Archit 3(2):7–18
Yeung AKO, Brockbank JW, Ulrich DO (1991) Organizational culture and human resource practices: an empirical assessment. Res Organ Chang Dev 5:59–82
Ylimäki T (2006) Potential critical success factors for enterprise architecture. J Enterp Archit 2(4):29–40