The role of non-commercial intermediate services in the valuations of ecosystem services: Application to cork oak farms in Andalusia, Spain

Anderson, 2003, 398 Aronson, 2009 Atkinson, G., Obst, C., 2017. Prices for ecosystem accounting. WAVES. https://www.wavespartnership.org/sites/waves/files/kc/Prices%20for%20ecosystem%20accounting.pdf (accessed 2 October 2018). Bateman, 2013, Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom, Science, 341, 45, 10.1126/science.1234379 Beguería, S., Campos, P., Serrano, R., Álvarez, A., 2015. Producción, usos, renta y capital ambientales del agua en los ecosistemas forestales de Andalucía. In: Campos, P., Díaz, M. (Eds.), Biodiversidad, Usos del Agua Forestal y Recolección de Setas Silvestres en los Ecosistemas Forestales de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 2, memoria 2.2. Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 102-273. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=988 (accessed 27 April 2018). Bugalho, 2011, Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9, 278, 10.1890/100084 Campos, P., 1999. Alcornocales del suroeste ibérico, in: Marín, F., Domingo, J., Calzado A. (Eds), Los Montes y su Historia. Una Perspectiva Política, Económica y Social. Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, pp. 245–285. Campos, P., Martín, D., Montero, G., 2003. Economías de la regeneración natural y de la reforestación del alcornocal. In: Pulido, F.J., Campos P., Montero G. (Eds), La gestión Forestal de la Dehesa. Instituto de Promoción del Corcho, la Madera y el Carbón (IPROCOR), Mérida, pp. 107–164. Campos, 2007, Measuring total sustainable incomes from multifunctional management of Corsican maritime pine and Andalusian cork oak Mediterranean forests, J. Environ. Plann. Mann., 50, 65, 10.1080/09640560601048424 Campos, 2008, Accounting for single and aggregated forest incomes: application to public cork oak forests of Jerez in Spain and Iteimia in Tunisia, Ecol. Econ., 65, 76, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.001 Campos, P., Caparrós, A., 2016. Valoración de los Servicios Públicos y la Renta Total Social de los Sistemas Forestales de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 5. Editorial CSIC, Madrid, 604 pp. Campos, 2016, Environmental income of grazing on privately-owned silvopastoral farms in Andalusia, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 250, 10.1002/ldr.2529 Campos, P., Mesa, B., Álvarez, A., Castaño, F.M., Pulido, F., 2017. Testing extended accounts in scheduled conservation of open woodlands with permanent livestock grazing: Dehesa de la Luz Estate case study, Arroyo de la Luz, Spain. Environments 4 (4), 82, 1–38. doi: 10.3390/environments4040082. Campos, 2019, Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting application in Andalusian forests, Spain, Ecol. Econ., 157, 218, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.017 Caparrós, 2017, Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: theory and application to recreation, Ecol. Econ., 139, 140, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.011 Carranza, J., Torres-Porras, J., Seoane, J.M., Fernández-Llario, P., 2015. Gestión de las poblaciones cinegéticas de los sistemas forestales de Andalucía. In: Campos, P., Martínez-Jauregui, M. (Eds.), Poblaciones, Demanda y Economía de las Especies Cinegéticas en los Montes de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 3, memoria 3.1, Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 7–185. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=989 (accessed 27 April 2018). Coelho, 2009, Mixed cork oak and stone pine woodlands in the Alentejo region of Portugal, 153 Coelho, 2013, “Montados” systems sustainability: landowners, activities and practices in Alentejo, Portugal, Silva Lusitana, 21, 163 Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0 Edens, 2013, Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accounting, Ecol. Econ., 90, 41, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.003 EFTEC (Economics for the Environment Consultancy Ltd), 2015. Developing UK natural capital accounts: woodland ecosystem accounts. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). London, 97 pp. http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=18909 (accessed on 14 September 2017). Eigenraam, 2018, Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Health Sustainability, 4, 247, 10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718 Eisner, 1989, 416 European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, World Bank, 2009. System of National Accounts 2008 (SNA 2008). New York, 722 pp. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2017). European Commission, 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 final. Brussels, 17 pp. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0244&from=EN (accessed on 23 January 2018). European Commission, 2016. Report on phase 1 of the knowledge innovation project on an integrated system of natural capital and ecosystem services accounting in the EU (KIP-INCA Phase 1 report). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/capital_accounting/pdf/KIP_INCA_final_report_phase-1.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2017). European Communities Manual on the Economic Accounts for Agriculture and Forestry EEA/EAF 97 (Rev. 1.1). EC 172 2000 EUROSTAT, Luxembourg pp. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5854389/KS-27-00-782-EN.PDF/e79eb663-b744-46c1-b41e-0902be421beb (accessed on 14 September 2017). Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. CICES V4.3 – Revised report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/GCComments/CICES_Report.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2017). Herruzo, 2016, Commercial income and capital of hunting: an application to forest estates in Andalucía, For. Policy Econ., 69, 53, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.004 Howarth, 2002, Accounting for the value of ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 41, 421, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00091-5 Keith, 2017, Ecosystem Accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 1683, 10.1038/s41559-017-0309-1 La Notte, A., Vallecillo, S., Polce, C., Zulian, G., Maes, J., 2017. Implementing an EU system of accounting for ecosystems and their services. Initial proposals for the implementation of ecosystem services accounts, EUR 28681. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp. 1–124. doi: 10.2760/214137, JRC107150. La Notte, 2019, Beyond the economic boundaries to account for ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 35, 116, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.007 La Notte, 2019, Capacity as “virtual stock” in ecosystem services accounting, Ecol. Indic., 98, 158, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.066 Maes, 2016, An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Ecosyst. Serv., 17, 14, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023 MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación), 2008. Diagnóstico de las Dehesas Ibéricas Mediterráneas. Tomo 1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación , Madrid. Unpublished. Martínez-Jauregui, 2016, Environmental price of game animal stocks, Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 21, 1, 10.1080/10871209.2016.1082682 Martínez-Peña, F., Aldea, J., de Frutos, P., Campos, P., 2015. Renta ambiental de la recolección pública de setas silvestres en los ecosistemas forestales de Andalucía. In: P. Campos, P., M. Díaz, M. (Eds.), Biodiversidad, Usos del Agua Forestal y Recolección de Setas Silvestres en los Ecosistemas Forestales de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 2, memoria 2.3, Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 274–388. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=988 (accessed 27 April 2018). Masiero, M., Pettenella, D., Boscolo, M., Barua, S.K, Animon, I., Matta, J.R., 2019. Valuing forest ecosystem services: a training manual for planners and project developers. Forestry Working Paper 11. FAO, Rome, 216 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. McElroy, 1976, Capital gains and social income, Econ. Inquiry XIV, 221, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00389.x Obst, 2016, National accounting and the valuation of ecosystem, assets and their services, Environ. Resour. Econ., 64, 1, 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1 Ogilvy, 2018, Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation, Ecosyst. Health Sustainability, 4, 261, 10.1080/20964129.2018.1544837 ONS (Office for National Statistics), Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2017. Principles of Natural Capital Accounting. Office for National Statistics, 52 pp. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/methodologies/principlesofnaturalcapitalaccounting (accessed on 14 September 2017). Ovando, P., Campos, P., Mesa, B., Álvarez, A., Fernández, C., Oviedo, J.L., Caparrós, A., Álvarez-Farizo, B., 2015. Renta y capital de estudios de caso de fincas agroforestales de Andalucía. In: Campos, P., Ovando, P. (Eds.), Renta Total y Capital de las Fincas Agroforestales de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 4, memoria 4.2 Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 156–445. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=990 (accessed 27 April 2018). Ovando, 2016, Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms, For. Policy Econ., 71, 43, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.031 Oviedo, J.L., Campos, P., Caparrós, A., 2015. Valoración de servicios ambientales privados de propietarios de fincas agroforestales de Andalucía. In: Campos, P., Ovando, P. (Eds.), Renta Total y Capital de las Fincas Agroforestales de Andalucía. Memorias Científicas de RECAMAN. Vol. 4, memoria 4.1, Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 8–155. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=990 (accessed 27 April 2018). Oviedo, 2017, Contribution of amenities to landowner income: case of Spanish and Californian hardwood rangeland, Ecol. Manage., 70, 518 Raunikar, 2006, Willingness to pay for forest amenities: the case of non-industrial owners in the south central Unite States, Ecol. Econ., 56, 132, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.013 Remme, 2015, Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg Province, the Netherlands, Ecol. Econ., 112, 116, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.015 Sumarga, 2015, Mapping monetary values of ecosystem services in support of developing ecosystem accounts, Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 71, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.009 Scarpa, 2000, Assessing the non-timber value of forests: a revealed-preference, Hedonic model, J. Forest Econ., 6, 83 Stone, R., 1984. The accounts of society. Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 December, 1984. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/stone-lecture.pdf (accessed 2 October 2018). Sutton, 2016, The ecological economics of land degradation: impacts on ecosystem service values, Ecol. Econ., 129, 182, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016 United Nations, 2012. The Future We Want: Outcome Document Adopted at Rio + 20. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro, 49 pp. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/rio20_outcome_document_complete.pdf (accessed 23 January 2018). United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, World Bank, 2014a. System of Environmental– Economic Accounting 2012 –Central Framework [SEEA-CF].United Nations, New York, 378 pp. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/SEEA_CF_Final_en.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2017). United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank Group, 2014b. System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012— Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. United Nations, New York, 198 pp. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/6925551/KS-05-14-103-EN-N.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2017). United Nations, 2017. Technical Recommendations in support of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012–Experimental Ecosystem Accounting, pp. i-xiii + 1–180. https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/technical_recommendations_in_support_of_the_seea_eea_final_white_cover.pdf (accessed 17 December 2018). Vojinovic, 2017, Combining ecosystem services with cost-benefit analysis for selection of green and grey infrastructure for flood protection in a cultural setting, Environments, 4, 3, 10.3390/environments4010003