The role of livestock feed fertilization as an improvement of sustainability in the dairy sector

Allen, 1998 Baldini, 2017, A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production, J. Clean. Prod., 140, 421, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.078 Baum, 2020, Eco-efficiency in measuring the sustainable production of agricultural crops, Sustainability, 12, 1418, 10.3390/su12041418 CEDRSSA, 2018 Chaudhary, 2017, Long-term effects of NPK fertilizers and organic manures on carbon stabilization and management index under rice-wheat cropping system, Soil Tillage Res., 166, 59, 10.1016/j.still.2016.10.005 Chen, 2018, Tiered life cycle sustainability assessment applied to a grazing dairy farm, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 1169, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.264 CONAGUA Dahlborn, 1998, Water intake by dairy cows selected for high or low milk-fat percentage when fed two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage, Swed. J. Agric. Res., 28, 167 EMEP/EEA, 2019 EMEP/EEA, 2019 FIRA, 2020 Flysjö, 2011, How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 420, 10.1007/s11367-011-0283-9 Fonseca, 2021 GCMA, 2020 Goedkoop, 2013 GREET, 2018 Guzmán Flores, 2018 Hanserud, 2018, Choice of mineral fertilizer substitution principle strongly influences LCA environmental benefits of nutrient cycling in the agri-food system, Sci. Total Environ., 615, 219, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.215 Hasler, 2015, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types, Eur. J. Agron., 69, 41, 10.1016/j.eja.2015.06.001 Henriques, 2004 Hidalgo Gallardo, 2017, 5 Hristov, 2013 IDF, 2015 Ijassi, 2021, Environmental impact evaluation of co-products: decision-aid tool for allocation in LCA, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 26, 2199, 10.1007/s11367-021-01984-0 INIFAP-CIRNE, 2010 IPCC, 2019 ISO, 2006 ISO, 2006 Jayasundara, 2019, Improving farm profitability also reduces the carbon footprint of milk production in intensive dairy production systems, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 1018, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.013 Juárez, 2015, Evaluation and classification of quality of commercial milk consumed in Tuxtepec, Oaxaca, Mexico, 2, 327 Kägi, 2016, Session “Midpoint, endpoint or single score for decision-making?”—SETAC Europe 25th Annual Meeting, May 5th, 2015, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 21, 129, 10.1007/s11367-015-0998-0 Kaizzi, 2017, Fertilizer use optimization: principles and approach, 9 Lara-Macías, 2014 Liu, 2017, Carbon footprint and its impact factors of feed crops in Guanzhong Plain, Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Sci. Circumstantiae, 37, 1201 Lloveras-Vilamanyà, 2010 Loera, 2017, Dairy industry in Mexico: parameters of the production of milk and supply of the internal market, Rev. Investig. Altoandinas - J. High Andean Res., 19, 419, 10.18271/ria.2017.317 Loya-González, 2019, Optimal activated carbon production from corn pericarp: a life cycle assessment approach, J. Clean. Prod., 219, 316, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.068 Mazzetto, 2020, Comparing the environmental efficiency of milk and beef production through life cycle assessment of interconnected cattle systems, J. Clean. Prod., 277, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124108 Medina-Cuéllar, 2021, Optimal nitrogen fertilization to reach the maximum grain and stover yields of maize (Zea mays L.): tendency modeling, Agronomy, 11, 1, 10.3390/agronomy11071354 Monteiro, 2021, Precision agriculture for crop and livestock farming—brief review, Animals, 11, 2345, 10.3390/ani11082345 Moraes, 2012, A linear programming model to optimize diets in environmental policy scenarios, J. Dairy Sci., 95, 1267, 10.3168/jds.2011-4651 Mutsamba, 2020, Forage and maize yields in mixed crop-livestock farming systems, NJAS: Wageningen journal ofLife Sci., 92, 1 Nemecek, 2014 <collab>OECD, 2021, Chapter 7. Dairy and dairy products Olson, 2003, Optimization models, 403 Quintero-Herrera, 2021, The use of broccoli agro-industrial waste in dairy cattle diet for environmental mitigation, Clean. Environ. Syst., 2 Rendón-Huerta, 2018, Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from Mexican intensive dairy farms, S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 48, 48, 10.4314/sajas.v48i1.6 Rivas-García, 2015, Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective, Environ. Technol., 36, 2198, 10.1080/09593330.2015.1024758 Ruiz-Rojas SADER-SIAP, 2019 SAGARPA, 2017 Sefeedpari, 2019, Technical, environmental and cost-benefit assessment of manure management chain: a case study of large scale dairy farming, J. Clean. Prod., 233, 857, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.146 SEMARNAT-INECC, 2018 SENASICA-INIFAP, 2015 SENASICA-INIFAP, 2015 SIAP, 2020 Tang, 2022, How does partial substitution of chemical fertiliser with organic forms increase sustainability of agricultural production?, Sci. Total Environ., 803, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149933 Timpka, 2001 2016 Villanueva-Betancourt, 2018 Wernet, 2016, The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 21, 1218, 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 West, 2002, A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 91, 217, 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00233-X Wilkerson, 1997, Prediction of excretion of manure and nitrogen by Holstein dairy cattle, J. Dairy Sci., 80, 3193, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76292-1 Yue, 2017, Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: from farm production to food consumption, J. Clean. Prod., 149, 1011, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.172 Zamudio-González, 2007, Availability and vertical movement of potassium in fluvisols with simulated drip irrigation, Terra Latinoam., 25, 287