The role of job strain on return to work after carpal tunnel surgery

Occupational and Environmental Medicine - Tập 62 Số 11 - Trang 778-785 - 2005
David Gimeno1, Benjamin C. Amick2,3, Rochelle V. Habeck4, Janet Ossmann3, Jeffrey N. Katz5
1Southwest Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77225-0186, USA.
2Rice University
3University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
4W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research,
5Harvard University

Tóm tắt

Aims:To examine the impact of job strain (that is, high psychological job demands and low job control) on return to work and work role functioning at two months, six months, or both, following carpal tunnel release surgery.Methods:A community based cohort of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients from physician practices was recruited between April 1997 and October 1998 throughout Maine (USA). 128 patients at two months and 122 at six months completed all relevant questions. A three level outcome variable indicated whether patients had: (1) returned to work functioning successfully, (2) returned to work functioning with limitations, or (3) not returned to work for health reasons. Two job strain measures were created: one, by combining psychological job demands and job control; and two, by dividing demands by control. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the three level work outcome variable.Results:After adjustment, workers with high demands and high control (active work) were less likely to successfully return to work (OR = 0.22; p = 0.014) at two months. Having a job with higher demands than job control (high strain) predicted not returning to work or returning to work but not successfully meeting job demands (OR = 0.14; p = 0.001), at six months.Conclusions:The findings underscore the role of psychosocial work conditions, as defined by the Karasek demand-control model, in explaining a worker’s return to work. Clinicians, researchers, and employers should consider a multidimensional and integrative model of successful work role functioning upon return to work. Moreover, since the evidence of the effects of work process changes on the reduction of CTS is very scarce, these findings point to the opportunity for collaborative workplace interventions to facilitate successful return to work.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0749-0712(01)00002-6

10.1056/NEJMcp013018

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Carpal tunnel syndrome fact sheet. Available at http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/carpal_tunnel/detail_carpal_tunnel.htm (accessed 14 July 2005).

10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80058-0

Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002, Issue 4. Art No: CD001554, DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD001554.

O’Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N. Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003, Issue 1. Art No: CD003219, DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD003219.

Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo J, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003, Issue 3. Art No: CD001552, DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD001552.

1999, J Hand Surg, 24, 398, 10.1016/S0363-5023(99)70014-6

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199701)31:1<85::AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-3

1998, J Hand Surg [Am], 23, 697, 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80058-0

10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01858.x

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<642::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-L

10.1001/jama.282.2.153

National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001:358–64.

1995, Am J Ind Med, 27, 451, 10.1002/ajim.4700270402

10.1023/A:1020270407044

10.1002/ajim.10326

1994, Am J Public Health, 84, 190, 10.2105/AJPH.84.2.190

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199903)35:3<232::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-G

10.1023/A:1009493813003

1995, J Hand Surg, 20A, 354

1994, Clin Orthop Rel Res, 301, 164

10.1136/oem.55.3.180

10.1023/A:1009441828933

10.1097/01.jom.0000126029.07223.a0

10.1002/ajim.20127

10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.282

10.2307/2392498

10.2105/AJPH.86.3.332

10.1136/jech.54.7.484

10.1136/jech.2003.016634

10.1002/art.1790110411

10.1002/ajim.1112

10.1097/00004356-200303000-00001

10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019

1995, Ind Labor Rel Rev, 48, 453

10.1023/A:1020222623882

10.1097/00007632-200012150-00010

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<600::AID-AJIM15>3.0.CO;2-2

10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322

2000, J Occup Rehab, 10, 21, 10.1023/A:1009437728024

Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: NY, Basic Books 1990:31–82.

10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.181

2002, Psychosomatic Med, 64, 370, 10.1097/00006842-200205000-00002

10.5271/sjweh.1386

10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031

1988, Arthritis Rheum, 32, 37

Long JS. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997:114–48.

10.2307/2532457

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 2000:116–28.

10.1080/0022250X.1975.9989847

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station: TX, Stata Corporation 2003.

Checkoway H, Pearce NE, Crawford-Brown DJ. Research methods in occupational epidemiology. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004:83–122.

1998, Soc Sci Med, 46, 1405, 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10084-3

10.1136/bmj.314.7080.558

10.1037/1076-8998.2.4.325

Frese M, Zapf D. Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In: Cooper CL, Payne R, eds. Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1988:375–410.

10.1097/00007632-199405000-00002

10.1097/00007632-199612150-00025

1991, Soc Sci Med, 32, 15, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90122-S

10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00140-9