The role of international regimes and courts in clarifying prevention of harm in freshwater and marine environmental protection
Tóm tắt
The international legal architecture to manage freshwater and ocean ecosystems does not adequately provide for the interconnected nature of these ecosystems or the transboundary harm flowing between them. Pollution from land-based sources exemplifies this issue where plastic, agricultural run-off, discharge of nutrients and pesticides and untreated sewage accounts for approximately 80% of all marine pollution globally and is not adequately addressed by international law. This paper examines the following question: What role have international freshwater and marine regimes and courts played in clarifying the normative content of the due diligence rule to avoid significant transboundary environmental harm, including harm from land-based sources of pollution? The discussion demonstrates that although international regimes have made a substantial contribution to clarifying the no-harm rule, significant gaps remain. For example, the need for further guidance regarding the obligation to take ‘all appropriate measures’ to avoid transboundary harm or the previous absence of due diligence standards to prevent marine pollution from land-based sources. This paper demonstrates how courts have contributed to a coherent interpretation of the no-harm rule across international freshwater and oceans law. It pinpoints instances where courts have taken a progressive approach, taking account of the latest developments in technology, assessing an acceptable level of risk, considering the interconnected ecosystem impacts of developments and quantifying compensation for environmental harm and also identifies examples where courts have not gone far enough. Finally, this paper discusses how regional seas regimes and recent global soft law developments have taken progressive steps towards addressing harm from land-based sources of pollution.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C. (2009). International law and the environment (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures, [2003] ITLOS Reports 27.
Case Concerning the Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Dugard 16 December 2015.
CBD (2010). Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2 adopted 29 October 2010.
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Judgment of 16 December 2015; ICJ Reports 2015, p. 665.
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Compensation, Judgment of 2 February 2018; ICJ Reports 2018, p. 15.
Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (22 September 1992; entered into force 25 March 1998) 2354 UNTS 67; reprinted in 32 ILM 1069 (1993) [OSPAR Convention].
Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of the Danube River 29 June 1994; entered into force 22 October 1998.
Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (21 May 1997; entered into force 17 August 2014) UN Doc A/51/869; reprinted in 36 ILM 700 (1997).
Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea 32 ILM (1993) 1069.
de Graaf, I. E. M., Gleeson, T., van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2019). Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature, 574(7776), 90–94.
de La Fayette, L. (1999). The OSPAR convention comes into force: Continuity and progress. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 14(2), 247–298.
FAO. (2018). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018-meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Finska, L., & Howden, J. G. (2018). Troubled waters—Where is the bridge? Confronting marine plastic pollution from international watercourses. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 27(3), 245–253.
Fitzmaurice, M. (2016). Enhanced marine environmental protection: A case study of the Baltic Sea. In J. Barrett & R. Barnes (Eds.), Law of the sea : UNCLOS as a living treaty (pp. 293–327). London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
González-Laxe, F. (2005). The precautionary principle in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 29(6), 495–505.
Harrison, J. (2017). Saving the oceans through law : The international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ILC, Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities (2001) UN Doc A/56/10; reprinted in Yearbook of the International Law Commission (2001) Vol II(2) 148 [Transboundary Harm Draft Articles].
ILC, Draft Articles on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses and Commentaries thereto and Resolution on Transboundary Confined Groundwater (1994) UN Doc A/49/10, reprinted in Yearbook of the International Law Commission (1994) vol. II, Part Two, 222 [1994 Draft Articles].
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Advisory Opinion, Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area 1 February 2011.
IPCC. (2019). IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
IUCN. (2019). Unsustainable fishing and hunting for bushmeat driving iconic species to extinction–IUCN Red List https://www.iucn.org/news/species/201907/unsustainable-fishing-and-hunting-bushmeat-driving-iconic-species-extinction-iucn-red-list.
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., et al. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771.
Janse, J., Kuiper, J., Weijters, M., Westerbeek, E., Jeuken, M., Bakkenes, M., et al. (2015). GLOBIO-Aquatic, a global model of human impact on the biodiversity of inland aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Science and Policy, 48, 99–114.
Kirk, E. A., & Popattanachai, N. (2018). Marine plastics: Fragmentation, effectiveness and legitimacy in international lawmaking. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 27(3), 222–233.
Memorandum of Understanding between the International Commission for the Protection of the Black Sea and the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River on Common Strategic Goals (2001).
Moynihan, R. (2021). Transboundary freshwater ecosystems in international law: The role and impact of the UNECE environmental regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OSPAR Recommendation 2014/18 on the Strategy for the Joint Assessment and Monitoring Programme (27 June 2014), which aims to fulfil the obligation under OSPAR regarding monitoring and assessment.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, Partial Award in the Matter of the Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v. India) (18 February 2013), PCA Case Nº 2011–01.
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment of 20 April 2010; ICJ Reports 2010, p. 14.
Tanaka, Y. (2016). Regulation of land-based marine pollution. In D. J. Attard, M. Fitzmaurice, N. Martinez, & R. Hamza (Eds.), The IMLI manual on international maritime law (Vol. III, pp. 139–168), Marine Environmental Law and International Maritime Security Law Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tanaka, Y. (2018). The South China Sea arbitration: environmental obligations under the Law of the Sea Convention. Review of European Comparative International Environmental Law, 27(1), 90–96.
Tanaka, Y. (2019). The international law of the sea (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v United Kingdom), Request for Provisional Measures, para. 89(1)(b).
The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan), Requests for Provisional Measures (27 August 1999) ITLOS Reports 1999, p 280.
UN General Assembly, Oceans and the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary-General, 18 August 2004, A/59/62/Add.1.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (17 March 1992; entered into force 6 October 1996) reprinted in 31 ILM 1312 (1992) [Water Convention].
UNESCO (2020). Blueprint for The Future We Want https://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/ioc-oceans/focus-areas/rio-20-ocean/blueprint-for-the-future-we-want/marine-pollution/.
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (10 December 1982; entered into force 16 November 1994) 1833 UNTS 3; reprinted in 21 ILM 1261 (1982).