The role of economics in transboundary restoration water management in the Colorado River Delta

Water Resources and Economics - Tập 8 - Trang 43-56 - 2014
Rosalind H. Bark1, George Frisvold2, Karl W. Flessa3
1Research Scientist, Ecosystem Sciences, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
2Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

2013 Bark, 2012, Adaptive basin governance and the prospects for meeting indigenous water claims, Environ. Sci. Policy, 169, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.005 Finn, 2011, Protecting indigenous values in water management: a challenge to conventional environmental flow assessments, Ecosystems, 14, 1232, 10.1007/s10021-011-9476-0 Garrick, 2012, Environmental water governance in federal rivers: opportunities and limits of subsidiarity in the River Murray of Australia, Water Policy, 14, 915, 10.2166/wp.2012.120 Worster, 1985 Colby, 2011, Inter-sectoral water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy, 743 Jerla, 2011, The role of research and development in drought adaptation on the Colorado River Basin, 423 US DOI (2012) Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study: Executive Summary. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, December 2012. Woodhouse, 2006, Updated streamflow reconstructions for the Upper Colorado River Basin, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05415, 10.1029/2005WR004455 Calderon-Aguilera, 2009, Just add water? Transboundary Colorado River flow and ecosystem services in the upper Gulf of California, 154 Zamora-Arroyo, 2009, Nature’s fair share: finding and allocating water for the Colorado River Delta, 23 F. Zamora-Arroyo, J. Pitt, S. Cornelius, E. Glenn, O. Hinojosa-Huerta, M. Moreno, J. Garcia, P. Nagler, M. de la Garza, I. Parra, Conservation priorities in the Colorado River Delta: Mexico and the United States, Sonoran Institute, Tucson, AZ, 2005, pp. 103. Available at 〈http://www.sonoraninstitute.org/component/ docman/doc details/ 1307-conservation-priorities-in-the-colorado-river-delta.html?Itemid=3〉. Medellín-Azuara, 2007, Water supply analysis for restoring the Colorado River Delta, Mexico, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 462, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:5(462) Glenn, 2013, Restoration potential of the aquatic ecosystems of the Colorado River Delta, 59, 1 Minute 306, Amendment to “Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande,” Conceptual Framework for United States–Mexico Studies for Future Recommendations Concerning the Riparian and Estuarine Ecology of the Limitrophe Section of the Colorado River and its Associated Delta, Signed in 1944, Minute 306 Signed in December, 2000. Available at http://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min306.pdf Minute 316, Amendment to “Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande,” Utilization of the Wellton-Mohawk Bypass Drain and Necessary Infrastructure in the United States for the Conveyance of Water by Mexico and Non-Governmental Organizations of Both Countries to the Santa Clara Wetland During the Yuma Desalting Plant Pilot Run, signed in 1944, Minute 316 signed in April, 2010. Available at 〈http://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Minute_316_w_JR.pdf〉 Garrick, 2011, Comparative perspective on basin governance in the Murray–Darling Basin: insights from the Western U.S, 367 Minute 317, Amendment to “Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande,” Conceptual framework for US–Mexico discussions on Colorado River cooperative actions, signed in 1944, Minute 317 signed in June, 2010. Available at 〈http://www.ibwc.state.gov/Files/Minutes/Min_317.pdf〉 Minute 319, Amendment to “Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande,” Interim International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado River Basin Through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California, Signed in 1944, Minute 319 Signed in November, 2012. Available at 〈http://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Minute_319.pdf〉. Gerlak, 2013, A delta in repair: restoration, binational cooperation, and the future of the Colorado River Delta, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustainable Dev., 55, 29, 10.1080/00139157.2013.785865 Minute 318, Amendment to “Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande,” Adjustment of Delivery Schedules for Water Allotted to Mexico for the Years 2010 Through 2013 as a Result of Infrastructure Damage in Irrigation District 014, Rio Colorado, Caused by the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California, Signed in 1944, Minute 318 Signed in December, 2010. Available at 〈http://www.ibwc.state.gov/Files/Minutes/Min_318.pdf〉 Frisvold, 2011, Climate, water availability energy costs, and National Park Visitation, 120 Moore, 1992, A multicrop production model of irrigated agriculture, applied to water allocation policy of the Bureau of Reclamation, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 17, 29 Antle, 1986, Dynamic input decisions in econometric production models, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 68, 939, 10.2307/1242140 Just, 1983, Estimation of multicrop production functions, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 65, 770, 10.2307/1240465 Schneider, 1997, Methods, amounts and timing of sprinkler irrigation for winter wheat, Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng, 40, 137, 10.13031/2013.21258 Knapp, 2008, Spatial dynamics of water and nitrogen management in irrigated agriculture, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 90, 524, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01124.x Kirby, 2014, Sustainable irrigation: how did irrigated agriculture in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin adapt in the Millennium drought?, Agric. Water Manage., 16, 739 Frisvold, 2012, Less water: how will agriculture in Southern Mountain states adapt?, Water Resour. Res., 48, 10.1029/2011WR011057 USBR (2007). Appendix H: Socioeconomic Data. Final Environmental Impact Statement—Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead. [Available online at 〈http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/strategies/FEIS/AppH.pdf〉]. USDA (2014). 2012 Census of Agriculture: Arizona State and County Data Volume 1 Geographic Area Series, Part 3. AC-12-A-3. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Imperial Irrigation District. 2014 Fallowing Programs (accessed online from 〈http://www.iid.com/index.aspx?page=190〉 June 16, 2014) Schuster, 2013, Farm and ecological resilience to water supply variability, J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 151, 70, 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2013.03153.x J. Medellín-Azuara, Economic-Engineering Analysis of Water Management for Restoring the Colorado River Delta. Ph.D. Diss., University of California, Davis, 2006. E. Schuster, B. Colby, L. Jones, M O’Donnell, Understanding the Value of Water in Agriculture: Tools for Negotiating Water Transfers. Guidebook, retrieved from 〈http://ag.arizona.edu/arec/pubs/facultypubs/Value%20of%20Water%20in%20Agriculture_12-23-11.pdf〉 (2013) pp Reclamation, Agreement to Implement a Demonstration Program for System Conservation of Colorado River Water, Contract no. 06-XX-30-W0451, 2006. Radonic, 2014, Arizona irrigation district tries land fallowing water transfer, 22, 1 Jones, 2010, Farmer participation in temporary irrigation forbearance: portfolio risk management, Rural Connections, 43 A. Kerna, Valuing Recreation and Environmental Flows in the Colorado River Delta Utilizing the Contingent Valuation Method, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, 2012. Brewer, 2006, Presidential address water markets in the west: prices, trading, and contractual forms, Econ. Inq., (2008), 46, 91, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00072.x Y. Carrillo-Guerrero, Water Conservation, Wetland Restoration and Agriculture in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 2009. Cash, 2003, Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 8086, 10.1073/pnas.1231332100