The role of doctors' religious faith and ethnicity in taking ethically controversial decisions during end-of-life care

Journal of Medical Ethics - Tập 36 Số 11 - Trang 677-682 - 2010
Clive Seale1
1Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 2, Newark Street, London E1 2AT, UK

Tóm tắt

Background and AimsThe prevalence of religious faith among doctors and its relationship with decision-making in end-of-life care is not well documented. The impact of ethnic differences on this is also poorly understood. This study compares ethnicity and religious faith in the medical and general UK populations, and reports on their associations with ethically controversial decisions taken when providing care to dying patients.MethodA postal survey of 3733 UK medical practitioners, of whom 2923 reported on the care of their last patient who died.FindingsSpecialists in care of the elderly were somewhat more likely to be Hindu or Muslim than other doctors; palliative care specialists were somewhat more likely to be Christian, religious and ‘white’ than others. Ethnicity was largely unrelated to rates of reporting ethically controversial decisions. Independently of speciality, doctors who described themselves as non-religious were more likely than others to report having given continuous deep sedation until death, having taken decisions they expected or partly intended to end life, and to have discussed these decisions with patients judged to have the capacity to participate in discussions. Speciality was independently related to wide variations in the reporting of decisions taken with some intent to end life, with doctors in ‘other hospital’ specialities being almost 10 times as likely to report this when compared with palliative medicine specialists, regardless of religious faith.ConclusionsGreater acknowledgement of the relationship of doctors' values with clinical decision-making is advocated.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1186/1472-6939-10-2

10.1177/0269216308102041

10.1177/0269216308100248

10.1136/bmj.308.6940.1332

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.025

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.007

10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02378-3

10.1136/jme.2006.020297

10.7326/0003-4819-133-7-200010030-00011

Wenger, 2004, Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors, Mt Sinai J Med, 71, 335

10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.061

10.1097/00005650-199709000-00002

10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.x

10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818c64a5

10.1136/bmj.329.7466.583

10.1136/bmj.326.7389.597

10.1177/1049909107310141

British Social Attitudes . Information system. http://www.britsocat.com (accessed 8 Jan 2010).

Clery E McLean S Phillips M . Quickening death: the euthanasia debate. In: Park A Curtice J Thomson K , eds. British social attitudes: perspectives on a changing society. 23rd Annual report. London: Sage, 2007:35–54.

Fischer, 2006, Responders and non-responders in a study on medical end-of life decisions in Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland, Soc Prev Med, 51, 24, 10.1007/s00038-005-0004-x

NHS Information Centre. NHS hospital and community health services: medical and dental staff, 2009. The Health and Social Care Information Centre, http://www.ic.nhs.uk, (accessed 8 Jan 2010).

10.1056/NEJMsa065316

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Medical Ethics

Tập 36 Số 11

677-682

Thông tin tác giả