The role and limits of strategic framing for promoting sustainable consumption and policy

Amsalem, 2020, Real, but Limited: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Framing Effects in the Political Domain, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 1 Aklin, 2013, Debating clean energy: Frames, counter frames, and audiences, Glob. Environ. Chang., 23, 1225, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.007 Bain, P.G., Hornsey, M.J., Bongiorno, R., Jeffries, C., 2012. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 603–603. Bain, 2016, Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 1 Barabas, 2010, Are survey experiments externally valid?, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 104, 226, 10.1017/S0003055410000092 Baumer, 2017, A simple intervention to reduce framing effects in perceptions of global climate change, Environ. Commun., 11, 289, 10.1080/17524032.2015.1084015 Bechtel, 2015, Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues, Polit. Sci. Res. Methods, 3, 683, 10.1017/psrm.2014.39 Beiser-McGrath, 2020, Problems with products? Control strategies for models with interaction and quadratic effects, Political Science Research and Methods, 8, 707, 10.1017/psrm.2020.17 Beiser-McGrath, 2019, Commitment failures are unlikely to undermine public support for the Paris agreement, Nat. Clim. Chang., 9, 248, 10.1038/s41558-019-0414-z Beiser-McGrath, 2019, Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?, Sci. Adv., 5, eaax3323, 10.1126/sciadv.aax3323 Beiser-McGrath, 2018, Assessing the relative importance of psychological and demographic factors for predicting climate and environmental attitudes, Clim. Change, 1 Bernauer, 2015, How robust is public support for unilateral climate policy?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 54, 316, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.010 Bernauer, 2013, Climate change politics, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 16, 421, 10.1146/annurev-polisci-062011-154926 Bernauer, 2016, Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 680, 10.1038/nclimate2948 Bolderdijk, 2013, Values Determine the (In) Effectiveness of Informational Interventions in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior, PLoS One, 8, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083911 Bolderdijk, 2013, Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning, Nat. Clim. Chang., 3, 413, 10.1038/nclimate1767 Boomsma, 2014, The effect of information and values on acceptability of reduced street lighting, J. Environ. Psychol., 39, 22, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.004 Borgstede, C. Von, Andersson, M., Hansla, A., Borgstede, C. Von, Andersson, M., 2014. Value-Congruent Information Processing : The Role of Issue Involvement and Argument Strength Value-Congruent Information Processing : The Role of Issue Involvement and Argument Strength 3533. 10.1080/01973533.2014.958226. Bouman, 2019, Motivating Society-wide Pro-environmental Change, One Earth, 1, 27, 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.002 Bouman, 2018, Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire, Front. Psychol., 9, 1, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564 Brügger, 2020, Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives, Global Environmental Change, 60, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102023 Brügger, 2015, Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang., 5, 1031, 10.1038/nclimate2760 Carattini, 2018, Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang., 9, 10.1002/wcc.531 Chong, 2007, Framing Theory, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 10, 103, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 Ciuk, 2016, The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion, Polit. Commun., 33, 328, 10.1080/10584609.2015.1017629 Cordts, A., Nitzko, S., Spiller, A., 2014. Consumer Response to Negative Information on Meat Consumption in Germany. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 17. Creutzig, 2016, Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 41, 173, 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085428 Creutzig, 2015, Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation?, Science (80-.), 350, 911, 10.1126/science.aac8033 Creutzig, 2018, Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 260, 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1 Diekmann, 2003, Green and greenback the behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations, Ration. Soc., 15, 441, 10.1177/1043463103154002 Drews, 2016, What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies, Clim. Policy, 16, 855, 10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 Druckman, J., 2013. Public opinion: Stunted policy support. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 617–617. Doi: 10.1038/nclimate1939. Druckman, 2012, Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects, Am. J. Pol. Sci., 56, 875, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x Druckman, J.N., McGrath, M.C., 2019. The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nat. Clim. Chang. Doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1. Dür, 2019, How interest groups influence public opinion: Arguments matter more than the sources, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 58, 514, 10.1111/1475-6765.12298 Eagly, 1993 Entman, 1993, Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, J. Commun., 43, 51, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Fanelli, 2010, “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences, PLoS One, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0010068 Fesenfeld, 2020, Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible, Nature Food, 1, 173, 10.1038/s43016-020-0047-4 Fesenfeld, 2018 Fesenfeld, 2020 Fesenfeld, 2021, Emphasizing urgency of climate change is insufficient to increase policy support, One Earth, 4, 411, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.010 Fesenfeld, 2018, Climate policy for short- and long-lived pollutants, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 933, 10.1038/s41558-018-0328-1 Festinger, 1962 Franzen, 2013, Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries, Glob. Environ. Chang., 1001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009 Framework Institute, Communications Jobs of 12 Frame Elements, 2018, (available at https://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF/comms_jobs.pdf). Fuglestvedt, 2008, Climate forcing from the transport sectors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 454, 10.1073/pnas.0702958104 Global Footprint Network, 2018. Global Footprint Network [WWW Document]. URL https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/. Godfray, 2018, Meat consumption, health, and the environment, Science., 361, 10.1126/science.aam5324 Graham, 2017, Communicating the climate impacts of meat consumption: The effect of values and message framing, Glob. Environ., 44, 98, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.004 Grimmer, 2017, Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects and the effects of heterogeneous treatments with ensemble methods, Polit. Anal., 25, 413, 10.1017/pan.2017.15 Hardisty, D., Johnson, E., Weber, E., 2010. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol. Sci. Hart, 2012, Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies, Communic. Res., 39, 701, 10.1177/0093650211416646 He, 2018, The environmental impacts of rapidly changing diets and their nutritional quality in China, Nat. Sustain., 1, 122, 10.1038/s41893-018-0035-y Hornsey, 2016, Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 622, 10.1038/nclimate2943 Howey, 2012, Policy: A challenging future for cars, Nat. Clim. Chang., 2, 28, 10.1038/nclimate1336 Inglehart, 1995, Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies, PS Polit. Sci. Polit., 28, 57, 10.2307/420583 Jacobs, 2011 Kahan, 2017, Out of the lab and into the field, Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 309, 10.1038/nclimate3283 Kahneman, 2011 Kane, 2018, No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments, Am. J. Pol. Sci., 00, 1 Kinder, 2007, Curmudgeonly advice, J. Commun., 57, 155, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x Klenert, 2018, Making carbon pricing work for citizens, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 669, 10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2 Kunda, 1990, The case for motivated reasoning, Psychol. Bull., 108, 480, 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 Lakoff, 2010, Why it matters how we frame the environment, Environ. Commun., 4, 70, 10.1080/17524030903529749 Leeper, T., Slothuus, R., 2018. Can Citizens Be Framed? How Persuasive Information More than Emphasis Framing Changes Political Opinions. Lelieveld, 2015, The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale, Nature, 525, 367, 10.1038/nature15371 Levine, 2017, A new approach for evaluating climate change communication, Clim. Change, 142, 301, 10.1007/s10584-017-1952-x Liberman, 2008, The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now, Science., 322, 10.1126/science.1161958 Mace, 2014, Whose conservation?, Science, 345, 1558, 10.1126/science.1254704 McCollum, 2018, Interaction of consumer preferences and climate policies in the global transition to low-carbon vehicles, Nat. Energy, 3, 1, 10.1038/s41560-018-0195-z Mildenberger, 2017, Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 1–29 Mills, 2009, Adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution, Nat. Rev. Cardiol., 6, 36, 10.1038/ncpcardio1399 Nelson, 1997, Toward a psychology of framing effects, Polit. Behav., 19, 221, 10.1023/A:1024834831093 Nilsson, 2016, Public acceptability towards environmental policy measures: Value-matching appeals, Environ. Sci. Policy, 61, 176, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.013 Nisbet, 2007, Science and society: Framing science, Science., 316, 56, 10.1126/science.1142030 Noar, 2006, A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here?, J. Health Commun., 11, 21, 10.1080/10810730500461059 O’Keefe, 2017, Misunderstandings of effect sizes in message effects research, Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 210, 10.1080/19312458.2017.1343812 Petty, 1986, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, 1 Poore, 2018, Reducing food ’ s environmental impacts through producers and consumers, 992, 987 Ratkovic, 2017, Sparse estimation and uncertainty with application to subgroup analysis, Polit. Anal., 25, 1, 10.1017/pan.2016.14 Scheufele, 2014, The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions, 1 Schleifer, 2018, Emerging markets and private governance: the political economy of sustainable palm oil in China and India, Rev. Int. Polit. Econ., 25, 190, 10.1080/09692290.2017.1418759 Schultz, 2003, Reframing Environmental Messages to be Congruent with American Values, Hum. Ecol. Rev., 10, 126 Schwartz, 2001, Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement, J. Cross. Cult. Psychol., 32, 519, 10.1177/0022022101032005001 Slothuus, 2010, When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment, Polit. Commun., 27, 158, 10.1080/10584601003709381 Slothuus, 2010, Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects, The Journal of Politics, 72, 630, 10.1017/S002238161000006X Spilker, 2017 Springmann, 2018, Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits, Nature, 562, 1, 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0 Springmann, 2017, Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities, Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 69, 10.1038/nclimate3155 Steg, 2018, Limiting climate change requires research on climate action, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 759, 10.1038/s41558-018-0269-8 Steg, 2014, An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals, J. Environ. Psychol., 38, 104, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002 Steg, 2014, An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour : The role of values, situational factors and goals, J. Environ. Psychol., 38, 104, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002 Wellesley, L., Happer, C., Froggatt, A., 2015. Changing Climate, Changing Diets Pathways to Lower Meat Consumption. Chatham House Rep. Whitmarsh, 2019, Framing effects on public support for carbon capture and storage, Palgrave Commun., 5, 17, 10.1057/s41599-019-0217-x Wicki, M., Fesenfeld, L., Bernauer, T., 2019a. In Search of Politically Feasible Policy‐Packages for Sustainable Transport: Insights from Choice Experiments in China, Germany, and the USA. Environ. Res. Lett. 14. Wicki, M., Huber, R., Bernauer, T. 2019b. Can Policy-Packaging Increase Public Support for Costly Policies? Insights from a Choice Experiment on Policies against Vehicle Emissions. J. Public Policy. Wiedenhofer, 2017, Unequal household carbon footprints in China, Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 75, 10.1038/nclimate3165 Willett, 2019, Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, Lancet (London, England), 393, 447, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 Wilk, 2002, Consumption, human needs, and global environmental change, Global Environ. Change, 12, 5, 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00028-0 Wolsko, 2016, Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 65, 7, 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005 Zhang, 2018, Experimental effects of climate messages vary geographically, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 10.1038/s41558-018-0122-0 Zhang, 2016, Consumer trust in different food provisioning schemes: evidence from Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod., 134, 269, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.078