The road towards future Internet
Tóm tắt
Given the emerging problems of today’s Internet, many new Internet architectures have been proposed by the net- working community. In general, the new approaches can be categorized into two types: evolutionary approaches and clean-slate approaches. The representative evolutionary solution is IPv6, while representative clean-slate approaches are NDN (Named Data Networking), MobilityFirst, NEBULA, XIA (Expressive Internet Architecture), and SDN (Software-Defined Networking). A comprehensive survey of these approaches is presented. Additionally, a novel network architecture that we recently proposed: ADN (Address-Driven Networking) is described, which intends to address the challenges faced by today’s Internet via the flexible and innovative utilization of IP addresses.
Tài liệu tham khảo
FULLER V, LI T. Classless inter-domain routing (cidr): the internet address assignment and aggregation plan[S]. The Internet Society, 2006: 1–27.
SRISURESH P, EGEVANG K. Traditional ip network address translator (traditional nat)[S]. The Internet Society, 2001: 1–16.
LI J, MIRKOVIC J, WANG M, et al. Save: source address validity enforcement protocol[C]//Proceedings of the 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, New York, USA, c2002, 3: 1557–1566.
ROSEN E, VISWANATHAN A, CALLON R. Multiprotocol label switching architecture[S]. The Internet Society, 2001: 1–61.
ESTRIN D, FARINACCI D, HELMY A. Protocol independent multicast-sparse mode (pim-sm): protocol specification (Revised)[S]. The Internet Society, 2006: 1–150.
WROCLAWSKI J. The use of RSVP with IETF integrated services,” [S]. The Internet Society, 1997: 1–33.
NICHOLS K, CARPENTER B. Definition of differentiated services per domain behaviors and rules for their specification[S]. The Internet Society, 2001: 1–24.
KENT S, ATKINSON R. Security architecture for the internet protocol[S]. The Internet Society, 1998: 1–78.
Asia Pacific Advanced Network Ltd. Asia-pacific advanced network [EB/OL]. http://www.apan.net.
TEIN2 project team. Trans-Eurasia information network [EB/OL]. http://www.tein2.net.
JACOBSON V, SMETTERS D K, THORNTON J D. Networking named content[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, Rome, Italy, c2009: 1–12.
YUAN H, SONG T, CROWLEY P. Scalable ndn forwarding: concepts, issues and principles[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Munich, Germany, c2012: 1–9.
SESKAR I, NAGARAJA K, NELSON S, et al. Mobility first future internet architecture project[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Asian Internet Engineering Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, c2011: 1–3.
ANDERSON T, BIRMAN K, BROBERG R, et al. NEBULA—a future internet that supports trustworthy cloud computing[EB/OL]. http://nebula-fia.org/papers/NEBULA-WP_TOC.pdf.
ANAND A, DOGAR F, HAN D, et al. XIA: an architecture for an evolvable and trustworthy internet[C]//Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Cambridge, USA, c2011, 63(3): 879–884.
Open Networking Foundation. Software-defined networking: the new norm for networks[S]. Open networking foundation white paper, 2012.
MCKEOWN N, ANDERSON T, BALAKRISHNAN H, et al, “Openflow: enabling innovation in campus networks[J]. ACM SIG-COMM computer communication review, 2008, 38(2): 69–74.
MA Z, ZHANG Z Q, DING Z G, et al. Key techniques for 5G wireless communications: network architecture, physical layer, and mac layer perspectives [J]. Science China information sciences, 2015, 58(4): 1–20.
DONG P, QIN Y J, ZHANG H K. Research on universal network supporting pervasive services[J]. Acta electronica sinica, 2007, 35(4): 599–606.
ZHANG H, QUAN W, CHAO H, et al. Smart identifier network: a collaborative architecture for the future internet[J]. IEEE network, 2016, 30(3): 46–51.
QUAN W, JIANG Z, SONG F, et al. Generalized model of function based collaboration in smart identifier network[C]//Proceedings of Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Sydney, Australia, c2015: 256–260.
JIA R, SU W, ZHANG H K. Traffic matrix-based routing optimization [C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Science and Intelligent Communication, Zhengzhou, China, c2015: 429–432.
WU Q, LI Z, ZHOU J, et al. SOFIA: toward service-oriented information centric networkings. IEEE Network, 2014, 28(3): 12–18.
XIE G G, SUN Y, ZHANG Y J, et al. Demo abstract: service oriented future internet architecture(sofia)[J]. IEEE infocom/poster, 2011: 1–2.
WU J P, LI D, BI J, et al. ADN: address driven internet architecture[J]. Chinese journal of computers, 2015, 38: No.6.
FARINACCI D, LEWIS D, MEYER D, et al. “The locator/id separation protocol (lisp)[S]. Internet engineering task force, 2013: 1–75.
WHITTLE R. Ivip (internet vastly improved plumbing) architecture[S]. Network working group, 2010: 1–70.
VOGT C. Six/one router: a scalable and backwards compatible solution for provider-independent addressing[C]. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Mobility in the evolving internet architecture, Philadelphia, USA, 2008: 13–18.
YANG X, CLARK D, BERGER A W. NIRA: a new interdomain routing architecture [J]. IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 2007, 15(4): 775–788.
GODFREY P, GANICHEV I, SHENKER S, et al. Path-let routing[J]. ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, 2009, 39(4): 111–122.