The relative efficiency of labor market programs: Swedish experience from the 1990s

Labour Economics - Tập 11 - Trang 335-354 - 2004
Kenneth Carling1, Katarina Richardson1
1Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, P.O. Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

AMS, 1998a. Arbetsmarknadspolitiska åtgärder. Årsrapport 1997, Arbetsmarknadsstyrelsen (National Labour Market Board), Apra 1998 2, Stockholm. AMS, 1998b. AMS Servicemätning 1998, Arbetsmarknadsstyrelsen (National Labour Market Board), Uin 1998 1, Stockholm. Bonnal, 1997, Evaluating the impact of French employment policies on individual labour market histories, Review of Economic Studies, 64, 683, 10.2307/2971735 Bring, 2000, Attrition and misclassification of drop-outs in the analysis of unemployment duration, Journal of Official Statistics, 16, 321 Calmfors, 1994, Active labour market policy and unemployment—A framework for the analysis of crucial design features, OECD Economic Studies, 22, 7 Carling, 1995, Starting values for the iterative maximum likelihood estimator in survival analysis, Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 515, 10.1080/757584789 Carling, K., Richardson, K., 2001. The relative efficiency of labour market programs: Swedish experience from the 1990's, Working paper series 2001:2 IFAU Uppsala. (www.ifau.se/swe/pdf2001/wp01-2.pdf). Carling, 1998, An experimental comparison of gradient methods in econometric duration analysis, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 27, 83, 10.1016/S0167-9473(97)00048-0 Carling, 2001, Do benefit cuts boost job findings? Swedish evidence from the 1990s, The Economic Journal, 111, 766, 10.1111/1468-0297.00659 Dahlberg, M., Forslund, A., 1999. Direct displacement effects of labour market programmes: the case of Sweden. Working paper series 1999 7 Office of Labor Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala. Edin, 1991, Unemployment, vacancies and labour market programmes: Swedish evidence European Commission, 1998. From Guidelines to actions: the national action plans for employment, Directorate-General for Employment. Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, Luxembourg. Gerfin, M., Lechner, M., 2000. Microeconometric Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Policy in Switzerland, mimeo, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research (SIAW), Bern. Harkman, A., 2002. Vilka motiv styr deltagandet i arbetsmarknadspolitiska program? Forskningsrapport 2002:9, Office of Labor Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala. Heckman, 1999, The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs, 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6 Johansson, P., Martinsson, S. (2000). Det nationella IT-programmet- en slutrapport om Swit. Forskningsrapport 2000:8. Office of Labor Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala. Layard, 1991 Narendranathan, 1993, Modelling the probability of leaving unemployment: competing risks models with flexible baseline hazard, Applied Statistics, 42, 63, 10.2307/2347410 Nyberg, S., Skedinger, P. 1998. Arbetsförmedlingarna - Mål och drivkrafter, Expertgrupper för studier i offentlig ekonomi. Finansdepartementet 1998 16 Stockholm: Regeringens offsetcentral. 1996 Regnér, 2002, A nonexperimental evaluation of training programs for the unemployed in Sweden, Labour Economics, 9, 187, 10.1016/S0927-5371(02)00013-1 Richardson, 2001, The effect of vocational training on the individual transition rate from unemployment to work, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8, 175 Ridder, 1986, An event history approach to the evaluation of training, recruitment and employment programmes, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 109, 10.1002/jae.3950010202 Rosenbaum, 1996, Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies, Statistical Science, 14, 259, 10.1214/ss/1009212410