The relative and incremental value relevance of goodwill before and after SFAS No. 142
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aharony, 2010, The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on equity valuation of accounting numbers for security investors in the EU, Eur. Account. Rev., 19, 535, 10.1080/09638180.2010.506285
Ahmed, 2011, Evidence on the effects of SFAS 142 on the reliability of goodwill write-offs. Working paper, Texas A&M University, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Alciatore, 1998, Asset write-downs: a decade of research, J. Account. Lit., 17, 1
1970
Baboukardos, 2016, Value relevance of accounting information under an integrated reporting approach: a research note, J. Account. Public Policy, 35, 437, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.04.004
Barth, 2001, The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view, J. Account. Econ., 31, 77, 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
Barth, 2009, Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research, J. Bus. Financ. Account., 36, 253, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x
Chalmers, 2011, Does a goodwill impairment regime better reflect the underlying economic attributes of goodwill?, Account. Financ., 51, 634, 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00364.x
Collins, 1997, Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years, J. Account. Econ., 24, 39, 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00015-3
Courtis, 1983, Business Goodwill: Conceptual Clarification via Accounting, Legal and Etymological Perspectives, Account. Hist. J., 10, 1, 10.2308/0148-4184.10.2.1
Easton, 2003, Scale and the scale effect in market-based accounting research, J. Bus. Financ. Account., 30, 25, 10.1111/1468-5957.00482
FASB, 2018. Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information, in: Conceptual Framework. FASB, Norwalk, CT.
FASB, 2004. FASB Response to SEC Study on the Adoption of a Principles-Based Accounting System.
FASB, 2001. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. FASB, Norwalk, CT.
Francis, 1996, Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs, J. Account. Res., 34, 117, 10.2307/2491429
Francis, 1999, Have financial statements lost their relevance?, J. Account. Res., 37, 319, 10.2307/2491412
Frankel, 2008, GAAP goodwill and debt contracting efficiency: Evidence from net-worth covenants, Rev. Account. Stud., 13, 87, 10.1007/s11142-007-9045-0
Glaum, 2018, Goodwill impairment: the effects of public enforcement and monitoring by institutional investors, Account. Rev., 93, 149, 10.2308/accr-52006
Hamberg, 2014, Changes in the value relevance of goodwill accounting following the adoption of IFRS 3. J. Int. Accounting, Audit. Tax., 23, 59, 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.07.002
Hayn, 2006, Leading indicators of goodwill impairment. J. Accounting, Audit. Financ., 21, 223
Healy, 2001, Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature, J. Account. Econ., 31, 405, 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
Holthausen, 2001, The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting, J. Account. Econ., 31, 3, 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00029-5
Jennings, 1996, The relation between accounting good will numbers and equity values, J. Bus. Financ. Account., 23, 513, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1996.tb01024.x
Johnson, 2021, Did SFAS 141/142 improve the market’s understanding of net assets, goodwill, or other intangible assets?, Rev. Quant. Financ. Account., 56, 891, 10.1007/s11156-020-00912-x
Lee, 2011, The effect of SFAS 142 on the ability of goodwill to predict future cash flows, J. Account. Public Policy, 30, 236, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.11.001
Lev, 1999, The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them, J. Account. Res., 37, 353, 10.2307/2491413
Li, 2017, Has goodwill accounting gone bad?, Rev. Account. Stud., 22, 964, 10.1007/s11142-017-9401-7
Lo, 2000, The Ohlson model: contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. J. Accounting, Audit. Financ., 15, 337
Moehrle, 2001, How Informative Are Earnings Numbers That Exclude Goodwill Amortization? Account, Horizons, 15, 243
Ohlson, 1995, Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation, Contemp. Account. Res., 11, 661, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
Oliveira, 2010, Intangible assets and value relevance: evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange, Br. Account. Rev., 42, 241, 10.1016/j.bar.2010.08.001
Penman, 2009, Accounting for intangible assets: there is also an income statement, Abacus, 45, 358, 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00293.x
Power, 2001, Imagining, measuring and managing intangibles. Accounting, Organ. Soc., 26, 691, 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00026-5
Ramanna, 2008, The implications of unverifiable fair-value accounting: evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting, J. Account. Econ., 45, 253, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.11.006
Ramanna, 2012, Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment, Rev. Account. Stud., 17, 749, 10.1007/s11142-012-9188-5
Tahat, 2018, The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence, Rev. Quant. Financ. Account., 50, 1147
Turner, L.E., 1999. Speech by SEC Staff: Initiatives for Improving the Quality Of Financial Reporting. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1999/spch252.htm.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2003. Study pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the adoption by the United States Financial Reporting System of a principles-based accounting system.
Wahlen, 1999, Response to FASB invitation to comment on Methods of Accounting for Business Combinations: recommendations of the G4+1 for achieving convergence, Account. Horizons, 13, 299, 10.2308/acch.1999.13.3.299
Watts, 2003, Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications, Account. Horizons, 17, 207, 10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
Zucca, 1992, A Closer Look at Discretionary Writedowns of Impaired Assets, Account. Horizons, 6, 30