The relationship between counterfactual thinking and emotional reactions to event outcomes: Does one account fit all?
Tóm tắt
By enabling a comparison between what is and what might have been, counterfactual thoughts amplify our emotional responses to bad outcomes. Well-known demonstrations such as the action effect (the tendency to attribute most regret to a character whose actions brought about a bad outcome) and the temporal order effect (the tendency to undo the last in a series of events leading up to a bad outcome) are often explained in this way. An important difference between these effects is that outcomes are due to decisions in the action effect, whereas in the temporal order effect outcomes are achieved by chance. In Experiment 1, we showed that imposing time pressure leads to a significant reduction in the action but not in the temporal order effect. In Experiment 2, we found that asking participants to evaluate the protagonists (“who ought to feel worse?”) led to a significant reduction in the temporal order but not in the action effect. The results suggest that the action and temporal order effects require different explanations and are consistent with other work that suggests that when decisions lead to bad outcomes a comparison of decision quality is an important determinant of the emotional response attributed to the protagonists. The stimulus materials used in our experiments may be downloaded from pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Byrne, R. M. J., & McEleney, A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1318–1331. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1318
Byrne, R. M. J., Segura, S., Culhane, R., Tasso, A., & Berrocal, P. (2000). The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. Memory & Cognition, 28, 264–281.
Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00203
Everitt, B. S. (1977). The analysis of contingency tables. London: Chapman & Hall.
Feeney, A., & Handley, S. (2006). Comparisons, mental models, and the action effect in judgments of regret. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1422–1430.
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160–173.
Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Wong, E. M. (2006). Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91, 33–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.33
Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524–536. doi:10.1177/0146167287134009
Miller, D. T., & Gunasegaram, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 1111–1118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1111
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1986). Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 513–519. doi:10.1177/0146167286124014
N’gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). When does action elicit more regret than inaction and is counterfactual mutation the mediator of this effect? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 324–343. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1322
Segura, S., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Temporal and causal order effects in thinking about what might have been. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1295–1305. doi:10.1080/02724980244000125
Walsh, C. R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2004). Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 369–378.
Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, L. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55, 161–169. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.161
Zhang, J. H., Walsh, C., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2005). Between-subject and within-subject measures of regret: Dilemma and solution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 559–566. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.004