The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming public engagement

Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F (2011) National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics 89:929–941

Anderson L (2008) Reflexivity. In: Thorpe R, Holt R (eds) The SAGE dictionary of qualitative management research. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, pp 184–186. doi: 10.4135/9780857020109.n86

Atkinson-Grosjean J (2002) Science policy and university research: Canada and the USA, 1979–1999. Int J Technol Policy Manag 2:102–124

Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3:24–41. doi: 10.1162/152638003322757916

Barakat N, Jiao H (2010) Proposed strategies for teaching ethics of nanotechnology. Nanoethics 4:221–228

Bauer MW, Jensen P (2011) The mobilization of scientists for public engagement. Public Underst Sci 20:3–11. doi: 10.1177/0963662510394457

Bauer MW, Allum N, Miller S (2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst Sci 16:79–95

Bentley P, Kyvik S (2011) Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Underst Sci 20:48–63. doi: 10.1177/0963662510384461

Besley JC, Nisbet M (2013) How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Underst Sci 22(6):644–659

Besley JC, Oh SH, Nisbet M (2012) Predicting scientists’ participation in public life. Public Underst Sci 22(8):971–987

Birch K (2013) The political economy of technoscience: an emerging research agenda. Spontaneous Gener: J Hist Philos Sci 7:49–61. doi: 10.4245/sponge.v7i1.19556

Blumenthal D (2003) Academic–industrial relationships in the life sciences. N Engl J Med 349:2452–2459. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr035460

Bracken LJ, Oughton EA (2006) “What do you mean?” The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Trans Inst Br Geogr 31:371–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00218.x

Brown MB (2009) Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. MIT Press

Bruce A, Lyall C, Tait J, Williams R (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the fifth framework programme. Futures 36:457–470. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003

Bucchi M, Neresini F (2002) Biotech remains unloved by the more informed. Nature 416:261–261

Cape Farewell (2009) Andes Expedition. In: Cape Farewell. http://capefarewell.com/2009.html . Accessed 1 Jun 2015

Corbin JD, Katz ME (2012) Effective strategies to counter campus presentations on climate denial. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 93:252–253. doi: 10.1029/2012EO270007

Crettaz von Roten F (2011) Gender differences in scientists’ public outreach and engagement activities. Sci Commun 33:52–75. doi: 10.1177/1075547010378658

Davenport S, Bibby D (2007) Contestability and contested stability: the life and times of CSIRO’s New Zealand cousins, the crown research institutes. Innov Manag Policy Pract 9:181–191. doi: 10.5172/impp.2007.9.2.181

Davies SR (2008) Constructing communication talking to scientists about talking to the public. Sci Commun 29:413–434

Davies SR (2013) Constituting public engagement: meanings and genealogies of pest in two u.k. studies. Sci Commun. doi: 10.1177/1075547013478203

Davies B, Glasser NF (2014) Analysis of www.AntarcticGlaciers.org as a tool for online science communication. J Glaciol 60:399–406. doi: 10.3189/2014JoG13J194

Davies S, McCallie E, Simonsson E et al (2009) Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy. Public Underst Sci 18:338–353

Dixon J, Sharp L (2007) Collaborative research in sustainable water management: issues of interdisciplinarity. Interdiscip Sci Rev 32:221–232. doi: 10.1179/030801807X183650

Dunwoody S, Brossard D, Dudo A (2009) Socialization or rewards? Predicting US. Scientist-media interactions. J Mass Commun Q 86:299–314. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600203

Einsiedel EF, Jelsøe E, Breck T (2001) Publics at the technology table: the consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Underst Sci 10:83–98. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/306

Evans R, Marvin S (2006) Researching the sustainable city: three modes of interdisciplinarity. Environ Plan A 38:1009–1028. doi: 10.1068/a37317

Falchetti E, Caravita S, Sperduti A (2007) What do laypersons want to know from scientists? An analysis of a dialogue between scientists and laypersons on the web site Scienzaonline. Public Underst Sci 16:489–506

Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 48:219–238. doi: 10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x

Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26:485–496. doi: 10.1177/0270467606295402

Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage

Goven J (2003) Deploying the consensus conference in New Zealand: democracy and de-problematization. Public Underst Sci 12:423–440

Goven J (2006a) Dialogue, governance, and biotechnology: acknowledging the context of the conversation, Integrated Assessment 6:2. http://journals.sfu.ca/int_assess/index.php/iaj/article/view/160

Goven J (2006b) Processes of inclusion, cultures of calculation, structures of power scientific citizenship and the royal commission on genetic modification. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:565–598. doi: 10.1177/0162243906289612

Goven J (2008) Assessing genetic testing: who are the “lay experts”? Health Policy 85:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.06.004

Goven J, Pavone V (2015) The bioeconomy as political project a polanyian analysis. Sci Technol Hum Values 40:302–337. doi: 10.1177/0162243914552133

Gross AG (1994) The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Underst Sci 3:3–23

Gupta N, Hamilton K, Chamot J (2013) Conveying cutting-edge discoveries to nonscientists: effective communication with media. JOM 65:835–839. doi: 10.1007/s11837-013-0617-0

Hagendijk RP (2004) The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds. Minerva 42:41–59

Halliwell J, Smith W (2011) Paradox and potential: trends in science policy and practice in Canada and New Zealand. Prometheus 29:373–391. doi: 10.1080/08109028.2011.641385

Haywood BK, Besley JC (2014) Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Underst Sci 23:92–106

Hoover E, Brown P, Averick M et al (2009) Teaching small and thinking large: effects of including social and ethical implications in an interdisciplinary nanotechnology course. J Nano Ed (Print) 1:86

House of Lords (2000) Science and society. 3rd Report of the Select Committee on Science and Technology. The Stationery Office, Parliament, London

Huffman LT, Levy R, Lacy L et al (2008) ANDRILL’s education and outreach programme 2005–2008: MIS and SMS project activities during the 4th IPY. Terra Antarct 15:221–235

Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10:1–18

Irwin A (2014) From deficit to democracy (re-visited). Public Underst Sci 23:71–76. doi: 10.1177/0963662513510646

Irwin A, Wynne B (1996) Misunderstanding science?: The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press

Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244

Jasanoff S (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff S (ed) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London and New York, pp 13–45

Jasanoff S (2014) A mirror for science. Public Underst Sci 23:21–26. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505509

Jasanoff S, Kim S-H (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47:119–146. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

Jensen P (2011) A statistical picture of popularization activities and their evolutions in France. Public Underst Sci 20:26–36

Jensen E, Buckley N (2012) Why people attend science festivals: interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Publ Underst Sci

Jensen P, Rouquier J-B, Kreimer P, Croissant Y (2008) Scientists who engage with society perform better academically. Sci Public Policy 35:527–541

Kitcher P (2011) Science in a democratic society. Poznan Stud Philos Sci Human 101:95–112

Kleinman DL (2003) Impure cultures: university biology and the world of commerce. Univ of Wisconsin Press

Kreimer P, Levin L, Jensen P (2011) Popularization by Argentine researchers: the activities and motivations of CONICET scientists. Public Underst Sci 20:37–47

Kuntz M (2012) The postmodern assault on science. EMBO Rep 13:885–889. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.130

Lane SN (2013) Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10:C6079–C6083. http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/10/C6079/2013/

Lave R, Mirowski P, Randalls S (2010) Introduction: STS and neoliberal science. Soc Stud Sci 40(5):659–675

Lehr JL, McCallie E, Davies SR et al (2007) The value of “dialogue events” as sites of learning: an exploration of research and evaluation frameworks. Int J Sci Educ 29:1467–1487. doi: 10.1080/09500690701494092

Leshner AI (2007) Editorial: outreach training needed. Science 315:161

Lezaun J, Soneryd L (2007) Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Underst Sci 16:279–297

Lin S-J (2013) Perceived impact of a documentary film: an investigation of the first-person effect and its implications for environmental issues. Sci Commun 35:708–733. doi: 10.1177/1075547013478204

Lowe P, Phillipson J, Wilkinson K (2013) Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists. Contemp Soc Sci 8:1–16. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.769617

Mayhew MA, Hall MK (2012) Science communication in a café scientifique for high school teens. Sci Commun 34:546–554. doi: 10.1177/1075547012444790

Metcalfe JA, Kristin, Shore, J (2012) National audit of Australian science engagement activities

Michael M (2009) Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics. Public Underst Sci 18:617–631. doi: 10.1177/0963662508098581

Mirowski P (2011) Science-mart. Harvard University Press

Mobjörk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:866–873. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003

Moed HF (2008) UK Research assessment exercises: informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics 74:153–161

Moore GT (2003) Recommendations for the parity of creative, artistic, design and professional work with traditional forms of research and scholarship; in C. Newton (Ed.), Design + Research: Project Based Research in Architecture (Melbourne) Available at: http://sydney.edu.au/architecture/documents/staff/garymoore/113.pdf [retrieved February 22, 2015]

National Science Panel (2013) A challenge for New Zealand’s leadership - the “Science and Society” challenge. Report of the national science challenges panel. 33–35

Neresini F, Bucchi M (2010) Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions. Public Understanding of Science 0963662510388363

Northcott D, Linacre S (2010) Producing spaces for academic discourse: the impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings. Aust Account Rev 20:38–54

Nowotny H (2000) Transgressive competence: the narrative of expertise. Eur J Soc Theory 3:5–21. doi: 10.1177/136843100003001001

Nowotny H (2014) Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets. Public Underst Sci 23:16–20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220

Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007) New-Zealand. OECD reviews of innovation policy, Paris

Osborne J, Dillon J (2007) Research on learning in informal contexts: advancing the field? Int J Sci Educ 29:1441–1445. doi: 10.1080/09500690701491122

Pestre D (2003) Regimes of knowledge production in society: towards a more political and social reading. Minerva 41:245–261. doi: 10.1023/A:1025553311412

Petts J, Owens S, Bulkeley H (2008) Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments. Geoforum 39:593–601. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.02.008

Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A et al (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37:267–281

Poliakoff E, Webb TL (2007) What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Sci Commun 29:242–263. doi: 10.1177/1075547007308009

Popa F, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65:45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002

Powell M, Colin M, Lee Kleinman D et al (2011) Imagining ordinary citizens? Conceptualized and actual participants for deliberations on emerging technologies. Sci Cult 20:37–70. doi: 10.1080/09505430903567741

Priestley R (2006) Ernest Marsden’s nuclear New Zealand: from nuclear reactors to nuclear disarmament. 139: 23–38

Priestley RK (2010) Nuclear New Zealand: New Zealand’s nuclear and radiation history to 1987; Ph.D., University of Canterbury, 2010

Priestley R (2012) Mad on Radium: New Zealand in the atomic age. Auckland University Press, Auckland

Reddy CM (2010) Dude, you are speaking romulan. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 91:384–384. doi: 10.1029/2010EO420005

Robbins PT (2007) The reflexive engineer: perceptions of integrated development. J Int Dev 19:99–110. doi: 10.1002/jid.1351

Sadler TD, Amirshokoohi A, Kazempour M, Allspaw KM (2006) Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: teacher perspectives and strategies. J Res Sci Teach 43:353–376

Salmon RA (2013a) Is climate science gendered? A reflection by a female “climate scientist.”. Womens Stud J 27:49–55

Salmon RA (2013b) New Zealand ICEFEST 2012 science & education programme summary and evaluation, report prepared for Christchurch city council

Salmon RA, Priestley RK (2015) A future for public engagement with science in New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 45: 2: 1–7. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2015.1023320

Salmon RA, Carlson DJ, Zicus S et al (2011) Education, outreach and communication during the International polar year 2007–2008: stimulating a global polar community. Polar J 1:265–285. doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2011.626629

Science Media Savvy. Available at: < http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/media-savvy-workshops/ >. [Accessed 23 February 2015]

Sievanen L, Campbell LM, Leslie HM (2012) Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management. Conserv Biol 26:315–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01808.x

Stilgoe J, Lock SJ, Wilsdon J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Underst Sci 23:4–15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154

Sturgis P (2014) On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies. Public Underst Sci 23:38–42. doi: 10.1177/0963662512468657

The Royal Society (2006) Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf [retrieved February 22, 2015]

Thorpe C, Gregory J (2010) Producing the post-Fordist public: the political economy of public engagement with science. Sci Cult 19:273–301

Torres-Albero C, Fernández-Esquinas M, Rey-Rocha J, Martín-Sempere MJ (2011) Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Underst Sci 20:12–25. doi: 10.1177/0963662510382361

Tyfield D (2012) A cultural political economy of research and innovation in an age of crisis. Minerva 50:149–167. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y

Varner J (2014) Scientific outreach: toward effective public engagement with biological science. Bioscience 64:333–340. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu021

Weigold MF (2001) Communicating science a review of the literature. Sci Commun 23:164–193

Wilkinson C, Bultitude K, Dawson E (2011) “Oh yes, robots! People like robots; the robot people should do something”: perspectives and prospects in public engagement with robotics. Sci Commun 33:367–397

Winner L (2010) The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press

Winstanley AH, Maria (2012) Research into the views and preferences of scientists and their employers towards non-peer communication. Research provided for the Ministry for Science and Innovation

Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2:321–337

Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genom 9:211–220

Wynne B (2014) Further disorientation in the hall of mirrors. Public Underst Sci 23:60–70. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505397