The pros and cons of state-level textbook adoption

Publishing Research Quarterly - Tập 5 Số 2 - Trang 71-80 - 1989
Michael A. Tulley1
1Indiana University at Kokomo, 2300 South Washington Street, 46902, Kokomo, IN

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Broudy, Eric. 1975. “The trouble with textbooks.”Teacher's College Record 77 (September): 13–34.

Farr, R.; M. Courtland, P. Harris, J. Tarr, and L. Treece. 1983.A case study of the Indiana state reading textbook adoption process. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Farr, Roger, Michael Tulley, and Lawrence Rayford. 1987. “Selecting basal readers: a comparison of school districts in adoption and nonadoption states.”Journal of Research and Development in Education 20 (Summer): 59–71.

Keesecker., Ward. 1949. “Free textbook trends across the nation.”School Life 32 (December): 44–45.

Powell, Deborah. 1986. “Retrospective case studies of individual and group decision making in district-level elementary reading textbook selection.” Ed. D. diss., Indiana University.

Tidwell, C.J. 1928.State Control of Textbooks. New York: Columbia University Press.

Tulley, Michael A. 1985. “A descriptive study of the intents of state level textbook adoption processes.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7 (Fall): 289–308.

Tulley, Michael A., and Roger Farr. 1985. “The purpose of state level textbook adoption: what does the legislation reveal?Journal of Research and Development in Education 18 (Winter): 1–6.