The propensity interpretation of probability and diagnostic split in explaining away

Cognitive Psychology - Tập 121 - Trang 101293 - 2020
Marko Tešić1, Alice Liefgreen2, David Lagnado2
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK
2Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderst, 2013, Evaluation for bleeding disorders in suspected child abuse, Pediatrics, 131, e1314, 10.1542/peds.2013-0195 Barbey, 2007, Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241, 10.1017/S0140525X07001653 Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823. Benjamini, 1995, Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289 Cheng, 1997, From covariation to causation: A causal power theory, Psychological Review, 104, 367, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367 Davis, 2017, The causal sampler: A sampling approach to causal representation, reasoning, and learning Eddy, 1982, Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities, vol. 8, 249 Erev, 1994, Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes, Psychological Review, 101, 519, 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.519 Fernbach, 2013, Cognitive shortcuts in causal inference, Argument & Computation, 4, 64, 10.1080/19462166.2012.682655 Fischhoff, 1999, Fifty–fifty = 50%?, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 149, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<149::AID-BDM314>3.0.CO;2-J Fox, 2011, Distinguishing two dimensions of uncertainty, 21 Giere, 1973, Objective single-case probabilities and the foundations of statistics, vol. 74, 467 Gigerenzer, 1995, How to improve bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats, Psychological Review, 102, 684, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684 Gillies, 2000 Gillies, 2000, Varieties of propensity, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 807, 10.1093/bjps/51.4.807 Griffiths, T. (2001). Explaining away and the discounting principle: Generalising a normative theory of attribution. Unpublished manuscript. Hájek, 2012, Interpretations of probability. In The stanford encyclopedia Humphreys, 1985, Why propensities cannot be probabilities, The Philosophical Review, 94, 557, 10.2307/2185246 Kahneman, 1982, Variants of uncertainty, Cognition, 11, 143, 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90023-3 Kelley, 1973, The processes of causal attribution, American Psychologist, 28, 107, 10.1037/h0034225 Keren, 2001, The probability-outcome correspondence principle: A dispositional view of the interpretation of probability statements, Memory & Cognition, 29, 1010, 10.3758/BF03195763 Khemlani, 2011, When one model casts doubt on another: A levels-of-analysis approach to causal discounting, Psychological Bulletin, 137, 195, 10.1037/a0021809 Liefgreen, 2018, Explaining away: Significance of priors, diagnostic reasoning, and structural complexity Mayrhofer, 2015, Agents and causes: Dispositional intuitions as a guide to causal structure, Cognitive Science, 39, 65, 10.1111/cogs.12132 Meder, 2017, Diagnostic reasoning, 433 Meeker, 2017, vol. 541 Morris, 1995, When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution, Psychological Review, 102, 331, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.331 Neapolitan, 2003 Pearl, 1988 Pearl, 2009 Pettigrew, 2016 Pilditch, 2019, The zero-sum fallacy in evidence evaluation, Psychological Science, 10.1177/0956797618818484 Popper, 1959, The propensity interpretation of probability, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10, 25, 10.1093/bjps/X.37.25 Rehder, B. (2011). Reasoning with conjunctive causes. In Proceedings of the cognitive science society (Vol. 33). Rehder, 2014, Independence and dependence in human causal reasoning, Cognitive Psychology, 72, 54, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.002 Rehder, 2014, The role of functional form in causal-based categorization, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 670 Rehder, 2005, Feature inference and the causal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 50, 264, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.002 Rehder, 2017, Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios, Memory & Cognition, 45, 245, 10.3758/s13421-016-0662-3 Rottman, 2014, Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks, Psychological Bulletin, 140, 109, 10.1037/a0031903 Rottman, 2016, Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away, Cognitive Psychology, 87, 88, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.002 Sussman, A. B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2011). A causal model theory of judgment. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (Vol. 33). Tversky, 1974, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1977). Causal schemata in judgments under uncertainty. Retrieved from: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a056667.pdf. Ülkümen, 2016, Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1280, 10.1037/xge0000202 Wellman, 1993, Explaining “explaining away”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 287, 10.1109/34.204911