The promise of using study-together groups to promote engagement and performance in online courses: Experimental evidence on academic and non-cognitive outcomes
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arendale, 2014, Holistic growth of college peer study group participants: Prompting academic and personal development, Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 31, 7
Baker, 2019, Does inducing students to schedule lecture watching in online classes improve their academic performance? An experimental analysis of a time management intervention, Research in Higher Education, 60, 521, 10.1007/s11162-018-9521-3
Bambara, 2009, Delicate engagement: The lived experience of community college students enrolled in high-risk online courses, Community College Review, 36, 219, 10.1177/0091552108327187
Bernard, 2009, A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education, Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243, 10.3102/0034654309333844
Bourgault, 2022, Faculty writing accountability groups: A protocol for traditional and virtual settings, Journal of Professional Nursing, 38, 97, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.12.007
Brindley, 2009, Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10, 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
Chang, 2016, Challenges facing group work online, Distance Education, 37, 73, 10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
Chen, 2015, MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains, Computers & Education, 86, 55, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
Chiong, 2012, Collaborative learning in online study groups: An evolutionary game theory perspective, Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 81, 10.28945/1574
Cho, 2017, Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: A scale development, Distance Education, 38, 70, 10.1080/01587919.2017.1299563
Cholifah, 2020, Improving student engagement in online learning: How the online learning readiness scale and self-assessment matter?, 218
Cox, 2006, Virtual access
Dawson, 2008, A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 224
Delahunty, 2014, Socio-emotional connections: Identity, belonging and learning in online interactions. A literature review, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 243, 10.1080/1475939X.2013.813405
DeVoe, 2007, Lessons learned from a study-group pilot program for medical students perceived to be ‘at risk’, Medical Teacher, 29, e37, 10.1080/01421590601034688
Eccles, 2002, Motivational beliefs, values, and goals, Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109, 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Fajer, 2020
Figlio, 2013, Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning, Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 763, 10.1086/669930
Freeman, 2007, Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels, Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203, 10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203-220
Garrison, 1999, Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87, 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gilken, 2019, Supporting belongingness through instructional interventions in community college classrooms, Community College Enterprise, 19
Gunawardena, 1997, Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397, 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
Hart, 2018, Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges, Education Finance and Policy, 13, 42, 10.1162/edfp_a_00218
Ho, 2007, Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice’s cooperative principle, The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 3, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.11.002
Hoffman, 2002, Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 4, 227, 10.2190/DRYC-CXQ9-JQ8V-HT4V
Holliday, 2008, Psychophysiological measures of learning comfort: Study groups’ learning styles and pulse changes, Learning Assistance Review, 13, 7
Huguet, 2001, Social comparison choices in the classroom: Further evidence for students’ upward comparison tendency and its beneficial impact on performance, European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 557, 10.1002/ejsp.81
Hurt, 2012, The “Facebook” effect: College students’ perceptions of online discussions in the age of social networking, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060210
Jaggars, 2016, How do online course design features influence student performance?, Computers & Education, 95, 270, 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
Jansen, 2018, Validation of the revised self-regulated online learning questionnaire, 116
Jung, 2002, Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 153, 10.1080/14703290252934603
Kurucay, 2017, Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course, Computers & Education, 115, 20, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
Li, 2021, Beyond first encounters with analytics: Questions, techniques and challenges in instructors’ sensemaking, 344
Madland, 2016, Enhancing student-student online interaction: Exploring the study buddy peer review activity, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17, 157, 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2179
McInnerney, 2004, Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7, 73
Miao, 2022, Teacher–student Interaction, student–student interaction and social presence: Their impacts on learning engagement in online learning environments, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 183, 514, 10.1080/00221325.2022.2094211
Moore, 1989, Three types of interaction, American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1, 10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, 2012, Theory of transactional distance, 84
Motz, 2022, When online courses became the student union: Technologies for peer interaction and their association with improved outcomes during COVID-19, Technology, Mind, and Behavior
Mullen, 2006, Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms, The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 257, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.005
OLT Faculty Development, 2020
Penn State University
Osborne, 2018, Use of online asynchronous discussion boards to engage students, enhance critical thinking, and foster staff-student/student-student collaboration: A mixed method study, Nurse Education Today, 70, 40, 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.014
Pacansky-Brock, 2020, Humanizing online teaching to equitize higher education, Current Issues in Education, 21, 1
Piezon, 2008, Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and US naval war college students, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9, 10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.484
Pintrich, 1990, Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33, 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Roulston, 2018, Students’ perceptions of learning about qualitative inquiry in online contexts, American Journal of Distance Education, 32, 190, 10.1080/08923647.2018.1475921
Rybczynski, 2011, Student use of out-of-class study groups in an introductory undergraduate biology course, CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 74, 10.1187/cbe-10-04-0060
Schellens, 2006, Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups, Computers & Education, 46, 349, 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010
SchWeber, 2013, Survival lessons: Academic continuity, business continuity, and technology, 151
Shackelford, 2012, Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 228, 10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
Sheeran, 2018, An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement, Higher Education, 76, 937, 10.1007/s10734-018-0253-2
Sher, 2009, Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8, 102
Smith, 2007, Using consensus groups in online learning, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007, 25, 10.1002/ace.244
So, 2008, Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors, Computers & Education, 51, 318, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Solanki, 2019, Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community?, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0213827
Sunar, 2017, How learners’ interactions sustain engagement: A MOOC case study, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10, 475, 10.1109/TLT.2016.2633268
Swan, 2003, Developing social presence in online course discussions
Tang, 1993, Spontaneous collaborative learning: A new dimension in student learning experience, Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 115, 10.1080/0729436930120201
Tawfik, 2017, The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC), Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 411, 10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3
Thai, 2019, We’re all in this together: The impact of Facebook groups on social connectedness and other outcomes in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 44, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.10.001
Tovar, 2010, Factorial Structure and Invariance Analysis of the Sense of Belonging Scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and, Development, 43, 199
Walton, 2017, The many questions of belonging, 272
Wilson, 2015, Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study, Research in Higher Education, 56, 750, 10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x
Xu, 2014, Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas, The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 633, 10.1353/jhe.2014.0028
Xu, 2018, EASEing students into college: The impact of multidimensional support for underprepared students, Educational Researcher, 47, 435, 10.3102/0013189X18778559
York, 2012, Interpersonal interaction in online learning: Experienced online instructors’ perceptions of influencing factors, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 83
Zevenbergen, 2004, Study groups as a tool for enhancing preservice students’ content knowledge, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 6, 4
Zgheib, 2019, 1186
Zhan, 2013, Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments, Computers & Education, 69, 131, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002
Zumbrunn, 2014, Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study, Instructional Science, 42, 661, 10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0