The present and future medicolegal importance of record keeping in anesthesia and intensive care: The case for automation
Tóm tắt
The anesthesia record is often crucial to successful defense in a meritless claim, because the adversarial role of the plaintiff's medical expert witness requires an attack on the record. Likewise the record may be pivotal in determining whether a defense should even be mounted as an alternative to an early settlement, because the failure of meaningful, supportive, or exculpatory documentation raises serious questions about the quality of care rendered. Advancing technology has made possible revolutionary changes in real-time monitoring and data recording. Concepts favoring the development and adoption of automated record systems for anesthesia are outlined through historic medicolegal perspectives on record keeping in general and computerization of the monitoring and recording methods in specific as a means of providing the best medicolegal evidence in defense of the anesthesiologist's performance. The analogy is often made between the successful development and acceptance of the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder combination in aviation and ongoing software development for automated recordkeeping and the quest for its use and professional acceptance in both anesthesia and intensive care settings.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Personal Communication, Douglas Douglas Danner, Defense Attornery Analysis 1988 Claims Review Committee. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Massachusetts, 1988
Gibbs RF. Legal perspectives on anesthesia. Huntsville, AL: McMahon Publishing, 1983;3(3)
Gibbs RF. Legal perspectives on anesthesia. Huntsville, AL: McMahon Publishing, 1983;3(4)
Aspen Systems Hospital law manual. Aspen, CO: Aspen Systems, 1973
Matte P. Legal implications of the patient's medical record. In: Wecht CH, ed. Legal Medical Annual 1971. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1971:345–375
Goldstein E. Hospital record: keystone in malpractice claims, 16, Physicians' Law Brief Number 3. 1974
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. JCAH accreditation manual for hospitals. Chicago: American Hospital Association, 1986
Foley v. Flushing Hospital and Medical Center, 341 N. Y. S. 2d 917 (1973)
Pyramid Life Insurance Co. v. Gleason, 360 P 2d 850 Kan (1961)
Daley. Medical reports and their admissibility under section 52 of the Federal Evidence Act. 1980
Hirsh H, Armitage D. Medical records. In: American College of Legal Medicine, ACLM textbook of legal medicine. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1988:218–229
Preiser. The high cost of tampering with medical records. Medical Economics 1986(Oct 4):84–87
Delroy P. Flight recordings as evidence in civil litigation. Valparaiso Univ Law Rev 1975;9(2)
Kreindler L. Aviation accident law, vol. 1. Matthew Bender, 1986
Renger M. Air accident investigation symposium. J Air Law Commerce 1970;36
Roberts C. The status of flight recorders in modern aircraft. J Air Law Commerce 1977;43
Sawyer R. Air accident investigation symposium. J Air Law Commerce 1970;36
Rudick R. Air accident investigation symposium. J Air Law Commerce 1970;36
United States v. McKeever, 169 F. Supp. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)
Duncan D. Evidence: establishing foundation requirements for admission of sound recordings (911 tapes). Washburn Law J 1985;24
State v. Lynch, 279 N.C. 1, 181, S.E. 2d 561 (1971)
Freed. Legal aspects of computer use in medicine, 32 Law Contemp Probl 674 1967
Black's law dictionary. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing, 1951