The power and perils of international law: A review essay on lawfare, constructivism and international lawpower

International Politics Reviews - Tập 5 - Trang 105-119 - 2017
Ryder McKeown1
1Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

The historical divide between power and international law is breaking down in a modern international system that is at once anarchical, competitive and highly legalized. While IR scholars have often considered international law to be relatively unimportant, separate from politics, and/or a means of fostering cooperation and mitigating conflict, recent scholarship at the intersection of power and law is examining how international law comprises a form of power in its own right. In this article, I review three books that exemplify this trend, arguing that they provide the foundations for a theory of legal power, or ‘lawpower’. Notably, the works under review suggest that international law is a potent social resource that is used strategically by a range of actors for their own ends and in their own ways. This conception of international law has significant implications for IR theory, military strategy and legal ethics.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbott, K.W., Keohane, R.O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.M. and Snidal, D. (Summer 2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. Barnett, M., and Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75. Bower, A. (2015). Arguing with law: Strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court. Review of International Studies, 41(2), 337–360. Bower, A. (2017). Norms Without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brunnee, J., and Toope, S.J. (2011). Interactional international law and the practice of legality. In E. Adler & V. Pouliot (Eds.), International Practices (pp. 108–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carr, E.H. (2001). The Twenty Years’ crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Dill, J. (2015). Legitimate Targets? Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Dunlap, C.J., Jr. (2008). Lawfare today: A perspective. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 3(1), 146–153. Dunlap, C.J., Jr. (2010). Does lawfare need an apologia? Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 43(1/2), 121–143. Dunlap, C. Jr. (2011). Lawfare Today...and Tomorrow. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 43, 315–325. Finnemore, M. (2004). The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Gartzke, E. and Lindsay, J. (2014). Complex Deterrence: Strategy in an Age of Complexity. Working paper, updated July 15, 2014. http://deterrence.ucsd.edu/files/2014/12/EGLindsay_CDDOverview_20140715.pdf. Goldsmith, J.L. and Posner, E.A. (2005). The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hurd, I. (2016). Enchanted and disenchanted international law. Global Policy, 7(1), 96–101. Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. December 23, 2009. Exerts from PM Netanyahu’s Speech at the Knesset’s Special Session. http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2009/Pages/PM-Netanyahu-addresses-%20Knesset-Special-Session-23-Dec-2009.aspx. Johnstone, I. (2011). The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics and Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Katzenstein, P.J. and Okawara, N. (2001/2). Japan, Asia-Pacific security, and the case for analytical eclecticism. International Security, 26(3), 153–185. Kennedy, D. (2004). The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kennedy, D. (2006). Of War and Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kittrie, O. (2016). Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Koh, H.H. (1997). Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2101. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2101. Koskenniemi, M. (2011). The Politics of International Law. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing. McKeown, R. (2015). Legal asymmetries in asymmetric war. Review of International Studies, 41(1), 117–138. McKeown, R. (2017). International law and its discontents: Exploring the dark sides of international law in International Relations. Review of International Studies. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000092. Mearsheimer, J. (1994/5). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49. Morgenthau, H. (1940). Positivism, functionalism and international law. The American Journal of International Law, 34(2), 260–284. Morgenthau, H.J. (1960). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (3rd edn). New York: Knopf. Nuñez-Mietz, F. (2016). Lawyering compliance with international law: Legal advisors in the ‘War on Terror’. European Journal of International Law, 1(2), 215–238. Nye, J.S., Jr. (2011). The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs. Price, R. (1998). Reversing the gun sights: Civil society targets landmines. International Organization, 52(3), 613–644. Price, R. (Ed.). (2008). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reus-Smit, C. (Ed.). (2004). The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (2008). Reuniting ethics and social science: The Oxford handbook of international relation. Ethics and International Affairs, 22(3), 261–270. Risse, T. (Winter, 2000). Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39. Scott, S.V. (1994). International law as ideology: Theorizing the relationship between international law and international politics. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 313–325. Scott, S.V. (2004). Is there room for international law in realpolitik? Accounting for the US ‘attitude’ towards international law. Review of International Studies, 30(1), 71–88. Sinclair, A. (2010). International Relations Theory and International Law: A Critical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Slaughter, A.-M., Tulumello, A.S. and Wood, S. (1998). International law and international relations theory: A new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship. The American Journal of International Law, 92(3), 367–397. Smith, R. (2008). The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. New York: Vintage Books. Steinburg, R.H. and Zasloff, J.M. (2006). Power and international law. The American Journal of International Law, 100(1), 64–87. Valentino, B., Huth, P. and Croco, S. (2006). Covenants without the sword: International law and the protection of civilians in times of war. World Politics, 58(3), 339–377. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wheaton, C.K.D. (2006). Strategic lawyering: Realizing the potential of military lawyers at the strategic level. Army Lawyer, 1, 1–16.