The possibilities in neighborhoods – Utilizing accessory apartments in existing homes to address social, environmental, and economic issues
Tóm tắt
Society has changed radically since the construction of many of the homes within American communities, which has resulted in these structures becoming increasingly incapable of meeting the demands created by, and exacerbating the problems of, contemporary life. This study focuses on housing within Sacramento, California, which similar to of many cities within the country has a large infrastructure of bungalow and ranch style homes. The specific social, economic and environmental changes that have occurred within the city since the construction of these homes and the resulting issues and unmet needs of homeowners are examined. From this information co-residency is explored as a solution for addressing those needs. Finally, examples of the home design revisions necessary to support these patterns of living are illustrated for the bungalow and ranch typologies common within Sacramento.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing. (1991) ‘Not in my backyard’ removing barriers to affordable housing, http://www.huduser.org/publications/RBCPUBS/NotInMyBackyward.html, accessed 29 June 2011.
Antonucci, T. and Jackson, J.S. (2007) Intergenerational relations: Theory, research, and policy. Journal of Social Issues 63 (4): 679–693.
Bakker, R. (1997) Elder Design – Designing and Furnishing Your Home for Your Later Years. New York: PenGuin Books.
Bower, R.S. (2002) Welcome to America's most diverse city. Time 25 August.
California Planning Roundtable; California Department of Housing & Community Development. (2002) Myths & facts about affordable & high density housing, http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/mythsnfacts.pdf, accessed 30 June 2011.
Campoy, A. (2008) With gas over $4, cities explore whether its smart to be dense. The Wall Street Journal 7 July: A1.
CBP, California Budget Project. (2008, August) Planning for California's Future: The State's Population is Growing, Aging, and Becoming more Diverse, [Brochure] cbp.com: Author.
Chapman, N. and Howe, D. (2001) Accessory apartments: Are they a realistic alternative. Housing Studies 16 (5): 637–650.
City of Sacramento. Development Services Department. (2007) Annexation history. February, http://www.cityofsacramento.org/dsd/planning/new-growth/sphere-of-influence/documents/AnnexationHistory.pdf, accessed 7 April 2009.
City of Santa Cruz. Planning and Community Development. (n.d.) Accessory dwelling unit development program. Santa Cruz: Author, http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/index.aspx?page=1150, accessed 12 September 2008.
Cooper, B. (1996) Facilitating the Construction of Accessory Dwelling Units in Seattle. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
Cummings, P. and Landis, J. (1993) Relationships between Affordable Housing Developments and Neighboring Property Values. Berkeley, CA: University of California Institute of Urban & Regional Development.
DeLiere, T.A. (2001) Good Things Come in 3's: Single Parent Multigenerational Family Structure and Adolescent Adjustment. Working Papers 0106.
Duchscherer, P. (1995) The Bungalow: America's Arts and Crafts Home. New York: Penguin Studio.
Faragher, J. (2001) Bungalow and ranch house: The architectural backwash of California. Western Historical Quarterly 32 (2): 149–173.
Haan, M. (2007) The homeownership hierarchies of Canada and the United States: The housing patterns of white and non-white immigrants of the past thirty years. International Migration Review 41 (2): 433–465.
Hayden, D. (2002) Redesigning the American Dream; The Future of Housing, Work, and Family Life. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Home Defenders League. (2011) Home wreckers: How Wall Street foreclosures are devastating communities, http://www.homedefendersleague.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Home-Wreckers-Report-March-16-2011.pdf, accessed 5 July 2011.
King, A.D. (1984) The Bungalow. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc.
Lancaster, C. (1958) The American bungalow. The Art Bulletin 40 (3): 239–253.
Loftus, M. (2000) Rescuing the relics of modern times. U.S. News and World Report 5 June: 56–57.
Maass, P. (1996) How to make hosing affordable: Let people subdivide their homes. U.S. News & World Report 121 (26): 51–55.
Montgomery County Maryland. Department of Housing and Community Affairs. (2005) Accessory apartments. 13 May, http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dhctmpl.asp?url=/Content/DHCA/housing/landload_T/accessory_apt_fact_sheet.pdf, accessed 19 April 2009.
Nebraska Energy Office. (n.d.) Minimizing the use of lumber products in residential construction. Nebraska Energy Office: Author, http://www.neo.ne.gov/home_const/factsheets/min_use_lumber.htm, accessed 7 November 2008.
Nickles, S. (2002) More is better: Mass consumption, gender, and class identity in postwar America. American Quarterly 54 (4): 581–622.
O'Leary, S. (2000) Accessory dwelling units: Model state act and local ordinance. Spectrum 73 (3): 8–9.
Pamuk, A. (2004) Geography of immigrant clusters in global. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (2): 287–307.
Parris, T. (2007) Green buildings. Environment. January/February (1): 3.
Sabia, J.J. (2008) There's no place like home – A hazard model analysis of. Research on Aging 30 (1): 3–35.
Sacramento County. County Assessor Office. (n.d.) Assessor parcel viewer, http://assessorparcelviewer.saccounty.net/GISViewer/Default.aspx, accessed 25 June 2009.
Salhus, M. (2006) Women in cohousing communities. Women and Environments International Magazine Spring/Summer: 70–71.
Schmidt, C.W. (2008) Bringing green homes within reach: Healthier housing for more people. Environmental Health Perspectives 116 (1): A24–A31.
Sigle-Rushton, W. (2002) The living arrangements of new unmarried mothers. Demography 39 (3): 415–433.
Smith, S.K., Rayer, S. and Smith, E.A. (2008) Aging and disability, implications for the housing industry and housing policy in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association 74 (3): 289–306.
United States Census Office. (1885) Report on the Mortality and Vital Statistics of the United States as Returned at the Tenth Census (June 1, 1880). 1 May.
US Census Bureau. (2010) American Community Survey, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September, http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/MYPTable?_bm=yand-geo_id=01000US&-qr_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_CP4_1&-ds_name=&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false, accessed 15 October 2010.
U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010) Employment Status of the Civilian Population by Sex and Age, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 5 November, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm, accessed 22 November 2010.
Van Hook, J. (2007) Immigration and living arrangements: Moving beyond economic need versus acculturation. Demography 44 (2): 225–249.
Winter, R. (1996) American Bungalow Style. New York: Archetype Press.
Woodyard, C. (2007) Vehicles keep inching up and putting on pound. USA Today 15 July.
Wright, G. (1981) Building the Dream. New York: Pantheon Books.