The political economy of EU trade policy: what do we (not) know?

Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft - Tập 28 Số 1 - Trang 97-110 - 2018
Aukje van Loon1
1Chair of International Politics, Faculty of Social Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adriaensen, J. 2016. National administrations in EU trade policy: maintaining the capacity to control. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Aggarwal, V.K., and E.A. Fogarty (eds.). 2004. EU trade strategies. Between globalism and regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ahnlid, A. 2005. Setting the global trade agenda: the European Union and the launch of the Doha Round. In European union negotiations: processes, networks and institutions, ed. O. Elgström, C. Jönsson, 130–147. London: Routledge.

Antkiewicz, A., and B. Momani. 2007. Pursuing geopolitical stability through interregional trade: the EU’s motives for negotiation with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). CIGI Working Paper No. 31.

Baldwin, M. 2006. EU trade politics-heaven or hell? Journal of European Public Policy 13(6):926–942.

Billiet, S. 2009. Principal-agent analysis and the study of the EU: what about the EC’s external relations? Comparative European Politics 7(4):435–454.

Bossuyt, F., M. Martins Gistelink, B. Kerremans, J. Orbie, and L. Tortell. 2009. The social dimension of European Union external trade relations. European Foreign Affairs Review 14(5)

Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a global actor, 2nd edn., Oxford: Routledge.

Carbone, M., and J. Orbie. 2014. Special Issue: perspectives on the trade-development nexus in the European Union. Contemporary Politics 20.

Collinson, S. 1999. ‘Issue-systems’, ‘multi-level games’ and the analysis of the EU’s external commercial and associated policies: a research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 6(2):206–224.

Da Conceição, E. 2010. Who controls whom? Dynamics of power delegation and agency losses in EU trade politics. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4):1107–1126.

Da Conceição-Heldt, E. 2011. Variation in EU member states’ preferences and the commission’s discretion in the Doha Round. Journal of European Public Policy 18(3):402–418.

De Bièvre, D. 2014. A glass quite empty: issue groups’ influence in the global trade regime. Global Policy 5(2):222–228.

De Bièvre, D., and J. Eckhardt. 2011. Interest groups and EU anti-dumping policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18(3):339–360.

Dür, A. 2008. Bringing economic interests back into the study of EU trade policy-making. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10(1):27–45.

Dür, A. 2010. Protection for exporters: power and discrimination in transatlantic trade relations, 1930–2010. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2014. Public opinion and interest group influence: how citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy 21(89):1199–1217.

Dür, A., and H. Zimmermann. 2007. Introduction: the EU in international trade negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4):771–787.

Dür, A. 2017. Virtual special issue: EU trade policy. Journal of European Public Policy. http://explore.tandfonline.com/content/pgas/rjpp-vsi-eu-trade-policy .

Elgström, O., and M. Frennhoff Larsén. 2010. Free to trade? Commission autonomy in the economic partnership agreement negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy 17(2):205–223.

Elgström, O., and M. Strömvik. 2005. The European Union as an international negotiator. In European Union negotiations: processes, networks and institutions, ed. O. Elgström, C. Jönsson, 117–129. London: Routledge.

Elsig, M. 2007. The EU’s choice of regulatory venues for trade negotiations: a tale of agency power? Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4):927–948.

Elsig, M., and C. Dupont. 2012. European Union meets South Korea: bureaucratic interests, exporter discrimination and the negotiation of trade agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(3):492–507.

Evenett, S.J. 2007. The United States exits, the European Union enters: what prospects are there for western FTA initiatives in the Asian and Pacific Region? Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Review 3(2):3–26.

Falke, A. 2005. German trade policy: an oxymoron? In The politics of international trade in the 21st century. Actors, issues and regional dynamics, ed. W. Grant, D. Kelly, 252–270. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Faust, J. 2004. Blueprint for an interregional future? The European Union and the Southern Cone. In EU trade strategies. Between globalism and regionalism, ed. V.K. Aggarwal, E.A. Fogarty, 41–63. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Frenhoff-Larsén, M. 2007. Trade negotiations between the EU and South-Africa: a three-level game. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4):857–881.

Garcia, M. 2012. Competitive fears: the EU, the US and the free trade agreements in East Asia. EU External Affairs Review II:59–71.

Garcia-Duran Huet, P., and J.L. Eliasson. 2017. The public debate over TTIP and its underlying assumptions. Journal of World Trade 51(1):23–42.

Gerlach, C. 2006. Does business really run EU trade policy? Observations about EU trade policy lobbying. Politics 26(3):176–183.

Gstöhl, S., and D. De Bièvre. 2018. The trade policy of the European Union. London: Palgrave.

Hayes-Renshaw, F., and H. Wallace. 2006. The council of ministers, 2nd edn., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hocking, B. 2004. Beyond Seattle: adapting the trade policy process. In Trade politics, 2nd edn., ed. B. Hocking, S. McGuire, 263–275. London: Routledge.

Kleimann, D. 2011. Taking Stock: EU Common Commercial Policy in the Lisbon Era. CEPS Working Document, No. 345 (April 2011).

Konold, D. 2014. Agrarinteressen als Verhandlungsmasse. Die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Union zwischen nationalen Präferenzen und internationalen Zwängen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Laursen, F., and C. Rhoederer-Rynning. 2017. Writing the rules of 21st century trade: the EU and the new trade bilateralism. Journal of European Integration 39(7)

Lewis, J. 2012. Council of Ministers and European Council. In The Oxford handbook of the European Union, ed. E. Jones, A. Menon, and S. Weatherhill, 321–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lütticken, F. 2006. Die europäische Handelspolitik in GATT/WTO. Nationale Außenpolitiken und ihr Einfluss auf die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Kommission am Beispiel der Verhandlungen zur Uruguay Runde. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Meissner, K. 2018. Commercial realism and EU trade policy: competing for economic power in Asia and the Americas. London: Routledge.

Meunier, S. 1998. Divided but united: European trade policy integration and EC-US agricultural negotiations in the Uruguay round. In The European Union in the world community, ed. C. Rhodes, 193–211. Boulder: Westview.

Meunier, S. 2005. Trading voices: the European union in international commercial negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaidis. 2006. The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6):906–925.

Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51(4):513–553.

Moravcsik, A. 1998. The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Orbie, J., and B. Kerremans. 2013. Theorizing European Union trade politics: contending or complementary paradigms. Journal of Contemporary European Research 9(4)

Parsons, C. 2002. Showing ideas as causes: the origins of the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Patterson, L. 1997. Agricultural policy reform in the European Community: a three-level game analysis. International Organization 51(1):135–165.

Poletti, A., and D. De Bièvre. 2013. The political science of EU trade policy: a literature review with a research outlook. Comparative European Politics 12(1):101–119.

Pollack, M. 2006. Delegation and discretion in the European Union. In Delegation and agency in international organizations, ed. D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson, and M.J. Tierney, 165–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R.D. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3):427–460.

Ramsteck, W. 2011. Managing Globalisation: Britische Handelspolitik unter New Labour. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Reichert, M.S., and B.M.E. Jungblut. 2007. European Union external trade policy: multilevel principal-agent relationships. Policy Studies Journal 35(3):395–418.

Richardson, L. 2012. The post-lisbon role of the European Parliament in the EU’s common commercial policy: implications for bilateral trade negotiations. College of Europe: EU Diplomacy Papers, 5.

Sapir, A. 1998. The political economy of EC regionalism. European Economic Review 42(3–5):717–732.

Sbragia, A. 2010. The EU, the US, and trade policy: competitive interdependence in the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17(3):368–382.

Schirm, S.A. 2013. Global politics are domestic politics: a societal approach to divergence in the G20. Review of International Studies 39(3):685–706.

Schirm, S.A. 2016. Domestic ideas, institutions or interests? Explaining governmental preferences towards global economic governance. International Political Science Review 37(1):66–80.

Schirm, S.A. 2018. Societal foundations of governmental preference formation in the Eurozone crisis. European Politics and Society 19(1):63–78.

Scholte, J.A. 2004. The WTO and Civil Society. In Trade Politics, ed. B. Hocking and S. McGuire, 141–161 (2nd. ed). London: Routledge.

Siles-Brügge, G. 2014. Constructing European Union trade policy: a global idea of europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Strange, M. 2015. Power in global trade governance: is the EU a unitary actor, a tool for dominance, or a site of contestation? GATS and the TTIP negotiations. International Journal of Public Administration 38(12):884–849.

Van den Hoven, A. 2004. Assuming leadership in multilateral economic institutions: the EU’s “development round” discourse and strategy. West European Politics 27(2):256–283.

Van Loon, A. 2013. Domestic politics in EU external relations: US-EU competition in trade. In Theoretical and institutional approaches to the EU’s external relations Global Power Europe, Vol. 1, ed. A. Boening, J. Kremer, and A. van Loon, 219–234. Heidelberg: Springer.

Van Loon, A. 2015. From Interregionalism to bilateralism: power and interests in EU-Brazil trade cooperation. In The European union and the BRICS: complex relations in the era of global governance, ed. M. Rewizorski, 141–159. Heidelberg: Springer.

Van Loon, A. 2017. Diverging German and British governmental trade policy preferences in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2017.1361815 .

Van Loon, A. 2018. Variation in Preferences: Domestic Interests and Ideas in British and German Governmental Trade Positions in EU FTA Negotiations. Ph.D. dissertation, Ruhr University Bochum. https://hss-opus.ub.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/5560/file/diss.pdf

Woll, C. 2009. Trade policy lobbying in the European Union. Who captures whom? In Lobbying the European Union: institutions, actors, and issues, ed. D. Coen, J. Richardson, 268–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woolcock, S. 2012. European Union economic diplomacy: the role of the EU in external relations. Farnham: Ashgate.

Young, A.R. 2012. Trade policy. In The Oxford handbook of the European Union, ed. E. Jones, A. Menon, and S. Weatherhill, 422–440. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, A.R. 2013. The Rise (and Fall?) of the EU’s Performance in the Multilateral Trading System. In The Performance of the EU in International Institutions, ed. S. Oberthür, K.E. Jörgensen and J. Sahin, 117–132. Oxon: Routlegde.

Young, A.R., and J. Peterson. 2006. The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6):795–814.

Young, A.R., and J. Peterson. 2014. Global parochial Europe: 21st century trade politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zimmermann, H. 2007. Realist power Europe? The EU in the negotiations about China’s and Russia’s WTO accession. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4):813–832.