Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Cảnh ngộ của những người bị mất uy tín: tác động bầu cử của việc kỳ thị và truy tố một chính trị gia chống nhập cư
Tóm tắt
Sự xuất hiện của các đảng chống nhập cư ở các nền dân chủ phát triển đã kích thích nhiều phản ứng khác nhau. Những phản ứng này, bao gồm việc kỳ thị các đảng này và truy tố các thành viên của họ vì tội phát ngôn thù hận, có thể dẫn đến những hậu quả không mong muốn. Những phản ứng này có tác động gì đến sự hỗ trợ của cử tri đối với các đảng này? Sử dụng phương pháp thí nghiệm, chúng tôi đã giao một mẫu đại diện cho cử tri Hà Lan với một trong sáu phiên bản của một video tin tức bị thao túng về một đảng chống nhập cư mới. Chúng tôi nhận thấy rằng việc kỳ thị đảng này làm giảm khả năng bỏ phiếu cho đảng đó, và điều này đặc biệt hơn khi có thông tin về việc một thành viên nổi bật bị truy tố vì tội phát ngôn thù hận so với khi không có thông tin đó. Dù sao đi nữa, tác động này bị điều chỉnh bởi thái độ chống nhập cư và được trung gian hóa bởi tính hợp pháp được cảm nhận của đảng.
Từ khóa
#chịu kỳ thị #đảng chống nhập cư #phản ứng cử tri #thí nghiệm trong chính trị #phát ngôn thù hận #tính hợp phápTài liệu tham khảo
Abou-Chadi, T., and W. Krause. 2018. The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions. A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science 46: 417.
Art, D. 2006. The politics of the Nazi past in Germany and Austria. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Art, D. 2011. Inside the radical right: The development in anti-immigrant parties in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arzheimer, K. 2009. Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 259–275.
Bakker, B.N., M. Rooduijn, and G. Schumacher. 2016. The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55: 302–320.
Barkan, S.E. 2006. Criminal prosecution and the legal control of protest. Mobilization 11 (2): 181–194.
Beyerlein, K., and K.T. Andrews. 2008. Black voting during the civil rights movement: A micro-level analysis. Social Forces 87 (1): 65–93.
Bishop, G.F. 2005. The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American Public Opinion Polls. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Blinder, S., R. Ford, and E. Ivarsflaten. 2013. The better angels of our nature: How the antiprejudice norm affects policy and party preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 841–857.
Bos, L., and W. Van der Brug. 2010. Public images of leaders of anti-immigration parties: Perceptions of legitimacy and effectiveness. Party Politics 16 (6): 777–799.
Burscher, B., J.H.P. Van Spanje, and C.H. De Vreese. 2015. Owning the issues of crime and immigration: The relation between immigration and crime news and anti-immigrant voting in 11 countries. Electoral Studies 38 (1): 59–69.
Capoccia, G. 2005. Defending democracy: Reactions to extremism in interwar Europe. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Converse, P. 1970. Attitudes vs. non-attitudes: The continuation of a dialogue. In The quantitative analysis of social problems, ed. E. Tufte. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Davenport, C. 2005. Introduction, repression and mobilization: Insights from political science and sociology. In repression and mobilization, ed. C. Davenport, H. Johnston, and C. Mueller. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dinas, E., and J.H.P. Van Spanje. 2011. Crime story: The role of crime and immigration in the anti-immigration vote. The case of the Dutch LPF in 2002. Electoral Studies 30 (4): 658–671.
Downs, W.M. 2001. Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats. West European Politics 24 (3): 23–42.
Downs, W.M. 2012. Political extremism in democracies: Combating intolerance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Earl, J. 2011. Political repression: Iron firsts, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 261–284.
Fennema, M. 2000. Legal repression of extreme-right parties and racial discrimination. In Challenging immigration and ethnic relations politics, ed. R. Koopmans and P. Statham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. 1970. Political power and legal legitimacy: A short history of political trials. Antioch Review 30: 157–169.
Gallagher, M., M. Laver, and P. Mair. 2011. Representative government in modern Europe. London: McGraw-Hill.
Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ingraham, B.L. 1979. Political crime in Europe: A comparative study of France, Germany, and England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ivarsflaten, E. 2008. What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 3–23.
Jacobs, L.C.N., and J.H.P. Van Spanje. 2018. Expert survey on hate speech prosecution of politicians in Europe, 1965–2016. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. https://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/Expert-Survey-Dataset.xlsx.
Jacobs, L.C.N., and J.H.P. Van Spanje. 2019. Martyrs for free speech? Disentangling the effects of legal prosecution of anti-immigration politicians on their electoral support. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09581-6.
Jacobs, L.C.N., and J.H.P. Van Spanje. 2020. Prosecuted, yet popular? Hate speech prosecution of anti-immigration politicians in the news and electoral support. Comparative European Politics 18 (6): 889–924.
Kirchheimer, O. 1961. Political justice. The Use of legal procedure for political ends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Koopmans, R. 1996. Explaining the rise of racist and extreme right violence in Western Europe: Grievances or opportunities? European Journal of Political Research 30: 185–216.
Linden, A., and B. Klandermans. 2006. Stigmatization and repression of extreme-right activism in the Netherlands. Mobilization 11 (2): 213–228.
Link, B.G., and J.C. Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 363–385.
Lipset, S.M., and G. Marks. 2000. It didn’t happen here: Why socialism failed in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
Lubbers, M., M. Gijsberts, and P. Scheepers. 2002. Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41: 345–378.
Major, B., and L.T. O’Brien. 2005. The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology 56: 393–421.
Meguid, B.M. 2008. Party competition between unequals: Strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rekker, R., and J.H.P. van Spanje. 2021. Hate speech prosecution of politicians and its effect on support for the legal system and democracy. Advance online publication. British Journal of Political Science.
Shah, D.V., D. Domke, and D.B. Wackman. 1996. To thine own self be true: Values, framing, and decision-making strategies. Communication Research 23 (5): 509–560.
Van der Brug, W., M. Fennema, and J. Tillie. 2005. Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: A two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273928.
Van der Eijk, C., W. Van der Brug, M. Kroh, and M.N. Franklin. 2006. Rethinking the dependent variable in electoral behavior-on the measurement and analysis of utilities. Electoral Studies 25: 424–447.
Van Donselaar, J. 1995. De Staat Paraat? De Bestrijding van Extreem-Rechts in West-Europa. The Hague: Babylon-De Geus.
Van Heerden, S.H., and W. Van der Brug. 2017. Demonisation and electoral support for populist radical right parties: A temporary effect. Electoral Studies 47 (1): 36–45.
Van Spanje, J.H.P. 2018. Controlling the electoral marketplace: How established parties ward off competition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Spanje, J.H.P., and C.H. De Vreese. 2014. Europhile media and eurosceptic voting: Effects of news media coverage on eurosceptic voting in the 2009 european parliamentary elections. Political Communication 31 (2): 325–354.
van Spanje, J.H.P., and R. Azrout. 2019. Tainted love: How stigmatization of a political party in news media reduces its electoral support. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31 (2): 283–308.
Van Spanje, J.H.P., and W. Van der Brug. 2007. The party as pariah: The exclusion of anti-immigration parties and its effect on their ideological positions. West European Politics 30 (5): 1022–1040.
Van Spanje, J.H.P., and C.H. De Vreese. 2015. The good, the bad and the voter: The impact of hate speech prosecution of a politician on electoral support for his party. Party Politics 21 (1): 115–130.
Van Spanje, J.H.P., and T. Weber. 2019. Does ostracism affect party support? Comparative lessons and experimental evidence. Party Politics 25: 745.
Walgrave, S., and K. De Swert. 2004. The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication 21 (4): 479–500.
Widfeldt, A. 2004. The diversified approach: Swedish responses to the extreme right. In Western democracies and the right extremist challenge, ed. R. Eatwell and C. Mudde. London: Routledge.