The performance prism to boost M&A success

Emerald - Tập 4 Số 3 - Trang 19-23 - 2000
ChrisAdams1, AndyNeely2
1Chris Adams is a senior manager in Andersen Consulting’s Process Excellence Core Capability Group in the UK and leads its “Managing with Measures” development initiative.
2Andy Neely heads up Cranfield University School of Management’s Centre for Business Performance and is author of Measuring Business Performance, published by The Economist.

Tóm tắt

In an age of an ever‐increasing number of mergers and acquisitions, why do so many fail? Throughout the 1990s, and on into the 2000s the newspapers are full of reports of frenetic M&A activity. Yet horror stories highlighting failed mergers and acquisitions – AT&T, Quaker Oats, Disney, Sony, Compaq, General Electric (yes, even GE) – abound. It is almost as if the excitement of the deal consumes management’s passion. In the run up to the merger or acquisition, energy levels are intense. Yet, afterwards planning and post‐merger activities are weak and ineffective. There are of course numerous reasons why M&As fail – poor strategic concepts, personality problems at the top, cultural differences, poor employee morale, incompatible information systems, etc. The one explored in this article is post‐merger integration. Specifically, we ask how managers can track whether their post‐merger integration efforts are working.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

The Economist (1999), 9 January.