G. C. Wick, A. S. Wightman andE. P. Wigner:Phys. Rev.,88, 101 (1952).
G. Wentzel:Quantum Theory of Fields (New York, 1949).
C. N. Yang andJ. Tiomno:Phys. Rev.,79, 495 (1950).
M. Gell-Mann:Phys. Rev.,92, 833 (1953);T. Nakano andK. Nishijima:Progr. Theor. Phys.,10, 581 (1953).
B. d’Espagnat andJ. Prentki:Phys. Rev.,99, 328 (1955).
J. Schwinger:Phys. Rev.,104, 1164 (1956).
R. Utiyama andW. Tobocman:Phys. Rev.,98, 780 (1955).
To illustrate the freedom due to gauge groups and the restrictions imposed by charge independence, we can consider the pion-nucleon situation. The fact that the reaction π+ + d → n + n is observed to go for (spin zero) pions in s-states, establishes only that, of the three particles p, n, π+, just one has negative intrinsic parity. The gauge groups of charge and nucleon number allow two parities, (say p and n), to be chosen by convention. (The form of the interaction, ψpγ5ψnφ + h.c., implied by this result is independent of the convention). The assumption of charge independence now predicts that π0 also has negative parity — a prediction which could be checked directly by observing the polarization of the γ-rays in the π0-decay. (See e.g.L. Wolfenstein andD. G. Ravenahll:Phys. Rev.,88, 279 (1953)).