The origin of wealth matters: Equity norms trump equality norms in the ultimatum game with earned endowments

Adams, 1963, Wage inequities, productivity and work quality, Ind. Relat., 3, 9, 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1963.tb00805.x Adams, 1965, Inequity in social exchange, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 2, 267, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2 Andersen, 2011, Stakes matter in ultimatum games, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 3427, 10.1257/aer.101.7.3427 Bergh, 2008, A critical note on the theory of inequity aversion, J. Socio Econ., 37, 1789, 10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.008 Bicchieri, 2010, Norms, preferences, and conditional behavior, Polit.Philos.Econ., 9, 297, 10.1177/1470594X10369276 Bicchieri, 2014, Social norms Bicchieri, 2008, An Embarrassment of Riches: Modeling Social Preferences in Ultimatum Games Binmore, 2010, Experimental economics: where next?, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 73, 87, 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.10.019 Cappelen, 2007, The pluralism of fairness ideals: an experimental approach, Am. Econ. Rev., 97, 818, 10.1257/aer.97.3.818 Cappelen, 2010, Responsibility for what? fairness and individual responsibility, Eur. Econ. Rev., 54, 429, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.005 Carlsson, F., He, H., Martinsson, P., 2010. Windfall vs. earned money in the laboratory: Do they affect the behavior of men and women differently? Working Papers in Economics University of Gothenburg. Cherry, 2001, Mental accounting and other-regarding behavior: evidence from the lab, J. Econ. Psychol., 22, 605, 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00058-7 Cherry, 2002, Hardnose the dictator, Am. Econ. Rev., 92, 1218, 10.1257/00028280260344740 Cherry, 2008, Self-interest, sympathy and the origin of endowments, Econ. Lett., 101, 69, 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.04.007 Demiral, 2018, The Entitlement Effect in the Ultimatum Game-Does It Even Exist? Engelmann, 2010, Inequality aversion and reciprocity in moonlighting games, Games, 1, 459, 10.3390/g1040459 Fehr, 2010, On inequity aversion: a reply to binmore and shaked, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 73, 101, 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.12.001 Frohlich, 2004, Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test, Public Choice, 119, 91, 10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024169.08329.eb Güth, 2014, More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 108, 396, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006 Henrich, 2001, In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies, Am. Econ. Rev., 91, 73, 10.1257/aer.91.2.73 Hoffman, 1994, Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games, Games Econ. Behav., 7, 10.1006/game.1994.1056 Hoffman, 1985, Entitlements, rights, and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice, J. Legal Stud., 14, 259, 10.1086/467773 Kahneman, 1990, Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem, J. Polit. Econ., 98, 1325, 10.1086/261737 Konow, 2000, Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 1072, 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072 Konow, J., Saijo, T., Akai, K., 2009. Morals and mores? experimental evidence on equity and equality from the us and japan. Working paper. Oxoby, 2008, Mine and yours: property rights in dictator games, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 65, 703, 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006 Rotemberg, 2008, Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 66, 457, 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.008 Ruffle, 1998, More is better, but fair is fair: tipping in dictator and ultimatum games, Games Econ. Behav., 23, 247, 10.1006/game.1997.0630 Walster, 1978