The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model

Amir Noori1, Hossein Bonakdari1, Khosro Morovati2, Bahram Gharabaghi3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2Environmental Research Center, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Afshari A, Mojahed M, Yusuff RM (2010) Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. Int J Innov Manag Technol 1(5):511

Atieh M, Gharabaghi B, Rudra R (2015) Entropy-based neural networks model for flow duration curves at ungauged sites. J Hydrol 529(3):1007–1020

Atieh M, Taylor G, Sattar AM, Gharabaghi B (2017) Prediction of flow duration curves for ungauged basins. J Hydrol 545:383–394

Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman N (1966) Manual de reference du programme ELECTRE. Note de synthese et Formation, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, France

Cegan JC, Filion AM, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2017) Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environ Syst Decis 37:123–133

Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

Chen JK, Chen IS (2010) Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Syst Appl 37(3):1981–1990

Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York

Figuera J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis, state of the art surveys. Springer-Verlag, New York

Gazendam E, Gharabaghi B, McBean E, Whiteley H, Kostaschuk R (2009) Ranking of waterways susceptible to adverse stormwater effects. Can Water Resour J 34(3):205–228

Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multi-attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag 16(6):382–394

Kahraman C, Onar S, Oztaysi B (2015) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8(4):637–666

Kodikara PN, Perera BJC, Kularathna MDUP (2010) Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study on urban water supply. Eur J Oper Res 206(1):209–220

Kurth MH, Larkin S, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2017) Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis: use in government agencies. Environ Syst Decis 37:134–143

MacCrimmon KR (1968) Decisionmaking among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach (No. RM-4823-ARPA). RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA

Minatour Y, Khazaie J, Ataei M (2013) Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in the west of Iran. Arab J Geosci 6(9):3417–3426

Minatour Y, Bonakdari H, Zarghami M, Bakhshi M (2015a) Water supply management using an extended group fuzzy decision-making method: a case study in north-eastern Iran. Appl Water Sci 5(3):291–304

Minatour Y, Khazaie J, Ataei M, Javadi AA (2015b) An integrated decision support system for dam site selection. Sci Iran Transa A Civ Eng 22(2):319

Mousavi S, Makoui A, Raissi S, Mojtahedi S (2012) A multi-criteria decision-making approach with interval numbers for evaluating project risk responses. Int J Eng 25(2):121–129

Netto OC, Parent E, Duckstein L (1996) Multicriterion design of long-term water supply in southern France. J Water Res Plan Manag 122(6):403–413

Niemczynowicz J (1999) Urban hydrology and water management—present and future challenges. Urban Water 1(1):1–14

Okeola OG, Sule BF (2012) Evaluation of management alternatives for urban water supply system using Multicriteria Decision Analysis. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 24(1):19–24

Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 17(3):211–220

Podvezko V (2011) The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika Eng Econ 22(2):134–146

Rogers M, Bruen M (1998) A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III. Eur J Oper Res 107(3):552–563

Roghanian E, Rahimi J, Ansari A (2010) Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS. Appl Math Model 34(12):3754–3766

Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

Satty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

Shannon CE (2001) A mathematical theory of communication. ACM Sigmobile Mob Comput Commun Rev 5(1):3–55

Srdjevic B, Medeiros YD (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 22(7):877–894

Tecle A, Fogel M, Duckstein L (1988) Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. J Water Res Plan Manag 114(4):383–398

Tzimopoulos C, Balioti V, Evangelides C (2013). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for dam selection. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on environmental science and technology, CEST Athens, Greece

Wang TC, Chang TH (2007) Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 33(4):870–880

Wang YJ, Lee HS (2007) Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput Math Appl 53(11):1762–1772

Wang JW, Cheng CH, Huang KC (2009) Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 9(1):377–386

Weng SQ, Huang GH, Li YP (2010) An integrated scenario-based multi-criteria decision support system for water resources management and planning: a case study in the Haihe River Basin. Expert Syst Appl 37(12):8242–8254

Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, vol 104. Sage Publications, London

Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer, New York

Zyoud SH, Fuchs-Hanusch D (2017) A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Syst Appl 78:158–181