The online affiliations of interest groups

Abernathy, C.E. 2015. Legislative Correspondence Management Practices: Congressional Offices and the Treatment of Constituent Opinion PhD thesis Vanderbilt University.

Bail, Christopher A., Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, M.B. Haohan Chen, Fallin Hunzaker, Jaemin Lee, Marcus Mann, Friedolin Merhout, and Alexander Volfovsky. 2018. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (37): 9216–9221.

Bail, Christopher A., Taylor W. Brown, and Marcus Mann. 2017. Channeling Hearts and Minds: Advocacy Organizations, Cognitive-Emotional Currents, and Public Conversation. American Sociological Review 82 (6): 1188–1213.

Barberá, Pablo, Andreu Casas, Jonathan Nagler, Patrick J. Egan, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2019. Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data. American Political Science Review 113 (4): 883–901.

Baumgartner, F.R. and B.L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rxwh

Bennett, W. Lance., and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The Logic of Connective Action: The Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information Communication and Society 15 (5): 739–768.

Berry, Jeffery M., and Clyde Wilcox. 2018. The Interest Group Society, 6th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bond, R.M. and M.D. Sweitzer. 2018. “Political Homophily in a Large-Scale Online Communication Network.” Communication Research pp. 1–23.

Boulianne, S., Karolina K.-M. and B. Bimber. 2020. “Mobilizing Media: Comparing TV and Social Media Effects on Protest Mobilization.” 23(5):642–664.

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Dino P. Christenson. 2014. The evolution and formation of amicus curiae networks. Social Networks 36 (1): 82–96.

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Dino P. Christenson. 2015. Comparing membership interest group networks across space and time, size, issue and industry. Network Science 3 (1): 78–97.

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Dino P. Christenson, and Alison W. Craig. 2019. Cue-Taking in Congress: Interest Group Signals from Dear Colleague Letters. American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 163–180.

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Dino P. Christenson, and Matthew P. Hitt. 2013. Quality over quantity: Amici influence and judicial decision making. American Political Science Review 107 (3): 446–460.

Business, The Economist. 2021. “CEO Activism in America is Risky Business.”. Accessed: April 17, 2021. https://www.economist.com/business/2021/04/14/ceo-activism-in-america-is-risky-business

Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, Adam William, and Paul Alexander Shotton. 2016. Changing the Face of Advocacy? Explaining Interest Organizations’ Use of Social Media Strategies. Political Communication 33 (3): 374–391.

Congressional Management Foundation. 2015. #SocialCongress 2015. Technical report Congressional Management Foundation.

Cranmer, Skyler J., and Bruce A. Desmarais. 2011. Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis 19 (1): 66–86.

Drenik, G. 2021. “Businesses Are Increasing Their Investments In Social Media As Consumers Use Social Media More Than Ever Before - Here ’ s Why.” Forbes .

Dür, Andreas. 2019. How interest groups influence public opinion: Arguments matter more than the sources. European Journal of Political Research 58 (2): 514–535.

Esterling, Kevin M. 2007. Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 93–109.

Fraussen, Bert, and Darren Halpin. 2018. How do interest groups legitimate their policy advocacy? Reconsidering linkage and internal democracy in times of digital disruption. Public Administration 96 (1): 23–35.

Grinberg, Nir, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, Briony Swire-Thompson, and David Lazer. 2019. Political science: Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363 (6425): 374–378.

Heaney, Michael T. 2004. Issue Networks, Information, and Interest Group Alliances: The Case of Wisconsin Welfare Politics, 1993–99. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (3): 237–270.

Heaney, Michael T. 2014. Multiplex networks and interest group influence reputation: An exponential random graph model. Social Networks 36 (1): 66–81.

Heaney, Michael T., and Geoffrey M. Lorenz. 2013. Coalition portfolios and interest group influence over the policy process. Interest Groups and Advocacy 2 (3): 251–277.

Heaney, M.T. and J.M. Strickland. 2016. “A Network Approach to Interest Group Politics.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks pp. 1–25.

Hojnacki, Marie. 1998. Organized interests’ advocacy behavior in alliances. Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 437–459.

Hojnacki, Marie, David C. Kimball, Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, and Beth L. Leech. 2012. Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 379–399.

Holyoke, Thomas T. 2009. Interest group competition and coalition formation. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 360–375.

Huber, Gregory A., and Neil Malhotra. 2017. Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. Journal of Politics 79 (1): 269–283.

Hula, K. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Georgetown University Press.

Interviews. 2021. “Personal Interviews.”. Conducted by the author with interest group staff.

Junk, Wiebke Marie. 2020. Synergies in lobbying? Conceptualising and measuring lobbying coalitions to study interest group strategies, access, and influence. Interest Groups and Advocacy 9 (1): 21–37.

Junk, Wiebke Marie, and Anne Rasmussen. 2019. Framing by the Flock: Collective Issue Definition and Advocacy Success. Comparative Political Studies 52 (4): 483–513.

Karpf, David. 2010. Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism. Policy and Internet 2 (4): 7–41.

Karpf, D. 2018. “Analytic Activism and Its Limitations.” Social Media and Society 4(1).

Katz, E. and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. A Report of the bureau of applied social research Columbia university Free Press.

Keller, Franziska B., David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and Jung Hwan Yang. 2020. Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication 37 (2): 256–280.

Krackhardt, D. 1994. Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In Computational organization theory. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc pp. 89–111.

Kwak, H., Changhyun, L., Hosung, P. and S. Moon. 2010. What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? In WWW 2010.

Lorenz, Geoffrey Miles. 2020. Prioritized Interests: Diverse Lobbying Coalitions and Congressional Committee Agenda Setting. Journal of Politics 82 (1): 225–240.

Lovejoy, Kristen, and Gregory D. Saxton. 2012. Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3): 337–353.

Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. W.W: Norton & Company.

Mahoney, C. and F.R. Baumgartner. 2004. “When To Go It Alone: The Determinants and Effects of Interest-Group Coalition Membership.” American Political Science Review .

Myers, S.A., Aneesh, S., Pankaj, G. and J. Lin. 2014. “Information network or social network? The structure of the twitter follow graph.” WWW 2014 Companion - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web pp. 493–498.

Nelson, David, and Susan Webb Yackee. 2012. Lobbying Coalitions and Government Policy Change: An Analysis of Federal Agency Rulemaking. Journal of Politics 74 (2): 339–353.

Newman, M.E.J. 2003. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67: 026126.

Obar, Jonathan A., Paul Zube, and Clifford Lampe. 2012. Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action. Journal of Information Policy 2: 1–25.

Osterbur, M. and C. Kiel. 2020. “Tweeting in echo chambers? Analyzing Twitter discourse between American Jewish interest groups.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics .

Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politcs. New York: Oxford University Press.

Papacharissi, Z. and M. De Fatima Oliveira. 2012. Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication 62 (2): 266–282.

Phinney, R. 2017. Strange Bedfellows: Interest Group Coalitions, Diverse Partners, and Influence in American Social Policy. Cambridge University Press.

Reuters. 2023. “How Social Media is Now Used by Corporations.”. Accessed: May 31, 2023. https://www.reutersevents.com/marketing/brand-marketing/how-social-media-now-used-corporations

Ringe, N., Jennifer, N.V. and J.H. Gross. 2013. Keeping your friends close and your enemies closer? Information networks in legislative politics. Vol. 43.

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Sin, G. and A. Lupia. 2003. “Which Public Goods Are Endangered?: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect The Logic of Collective Action.” Public Choice .

Stein, Laura. 2009. Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society - NEW MEDIA SOC 11: 749–771.

Theocharis, Yannis, Shelley Boulianne, Karolina Koc-Michalska, and Bruce Bimber. 2022. Platform Affordances and Political Participation: How Social Media Reshape Political Engagement. West European Politics 40 (4): 1–24.

Tresch, Anke, and Manuel Fischer. 2015. In search of political influence: Outside lobbying behaviour and media coverage of social movements, interest groups and political parties in six Western European countries. International Political Science Review 36 (4): 355–372.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Yale University Press. 2017. Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

van der Graaf, Amber, Simon Otjes, and Anne Rasmussen. 2016. Weapon of the weak? The social media landscape of interest groups. European Journal of Communication 31 (2): 120–135.

Victor, J.N. 2009. “The Spatial Model of Interest Group Choice.” Working Paper . Accessed May 31, 2023.

Victor, Jennifer Nicoll, and Gregory Koger. 2016. Financing Friends: How lobbyists create a web of relationships among members of Congress. Interest Groups and Advocacy 5 (3): 224–262.

Williams, N.W., Casas, A., Zuidema, W., Aslett, K. and J. Wilkerson. 2019. “A Social Media Approach to Measuring Frame Impacts: What Was the Problem in Parkland?” SSRN Electronic Journal pp. 1–34.

Widner, K., Macdonald, M. and A. Gunderson. 2020. “Lobbying Inside (and) Out: Interest Group Behavior on Social Media.”.

Williams, J. 2018. Stand Out of Our Light: Freedom and Resistance in the Attention Economy. Cambridge University Press.

Wojcik, S. and A. Hughes. 2019. Sizing Up Twitter Users. Technical report Pew Research.