The need for unconventional value aggregation techniques: experiences from eliciting stakeholder preferences in environmental management

Argyris, 2014, CUT: a multicriteria approach for concavifiable preferences, Oper Res, 62, 633, 10.1287/opre.2014.1274 Beliakov, 2007 Belton, 2002 Boutilier C (2003) On the foundations of expected utility. In: Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Acapulco, pp 285–290 Bundi, 2000, Scientific base and modular concept for comprehensive assessment of streams in Switzerland, Hydrobiologia, 422, 477, 10.1023/A:1017071427716 Clemen, 2013 Cyert, 1979, Adaptive utility, 223 Dyer, 1979, Measurable multiattribute value functions, Oper Res, 27, 810, 10.1287/opre.27.4.810 Dyer, 1982, Relative risk aversion, Manag Sci, 28, 875, 10.1287/mnsc.28.8.875 Eisenführ, 2010 Grabisch, 2010, A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, Ann Oper Res, 175, 247, 10.1007/s10479-009-0655-8 Grabisch, 2008, A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory applications of the Kappalab R package, Eur J Oper Res, 186, 766, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.025 Grabisch, 2009 Grabisch, 2011, Aggregation functions: means, Inf Sci, 181, 1, 10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.043 Grabisch, 2011, Aggregation functions: construction methods, conjunctive, disjunctive and mixed classes, Inf Sci, 181, 23, 10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.040 Haag, 2019, Identifying non-additive multi-attribute value functions based on uncertain indifference statements, Omega, 95, 49, 10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.011 Haag, 2019, Integrating uncertainty of preferences and predictions in decision models: an application to regional wastewater planning, J Environ Manag, 252, 109652, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109652 Hoyos, 2010, The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments, Ecol Econ, 69, 1595, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011 Jacquet-Lagreze, 1982, Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method, Eur J Oper Res, 10, 151, 10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2 Kahneman, 2003, A perspective on judgment and choice—mapping bounded rationality, Am Psychol, 58, 697, 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 Kahneman, 1979, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263, 10.2307/1914185 Känel B, Michel C, Reichert P (2017) Methoden zur Untersuchung und Beurteilung der Fliessgewässer. Makrophyten—Stufe F (flächendeckend) und Stufe S (systembezogen). Entwurf. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern. Umwelt-Vollzug, 119 S. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag:17319 Keeney, 1988, Building models of values, Eur J Oper Res, 37, 149, 10.1016/0377-2217(88)90324-4 Keeney, 1992 Keeney, 1976 Korhonen, 1984, Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using convex cones, Manag Sci, 30, 1336, 10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1336 Korhonen, 2016, Dual cone approach to convex-cone dominance in multiple criteria decision making, Eur J Oper Res, 249, 1139, 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.043 Korhonen, 2017, The use of quasi-concave value functions in MCDA: some theoretical results, Math Methods Oper Res, 86, 367, 10.1007/s00186-017-0601-5 Langhans, 2011, Einbettung von Verfahren zur Fliessgewässerbewertung in ein übergeordnetes Gewässermanagementkonzept—Vorschläge am Beispiel des Modustufenkonzepts, Wasser Energ Luft, 103, 204 Langhans, 2013, How to make river assessments comparable: a demonstration for hydromorphology, Ecol Ind, 32, 264, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.027 Langhans, 2014, The method matters: a guide for indicator aggregation in ecological assessments, Ecol Ind, 45, 2014 Marttunen, 2019, Methods to inform the development of concise objectives hierarchies in multi-criteria decision analysis, Eur J Oper Res, 277, 604, 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.039 Niederberger K, Rey P, Reichert P, Schlosser J, Helg U, Haertel-Borer S, Binderheim E (2016) Methoden zur Untersuchung und Beurteilung der Seen in der Schweiz Modul Ökomorphologie Seeufer. Umwelt-Vollzug nr. 1632. Swiss Federal Office of the Environment, Bern. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag:16007 Prasad, 1997, Use of convex cones in interactive multiple objective decision making, Manag Sci, 43, 723, 10.1287/mnsc.43.5.723 Ramesh, 1988, Theory of convex cones in multicriteria decision making, Ann Oper Res, 16, 131, 10.1007/BF02283741 Reichert, 2007, Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation, Environ Model Softw, 22, 188, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.017 Reichert, 2011, MCWM—Ein Konzept für multikriterielle Entscheidungsunterstützung im Wassermanagement, Wasser Energ Luft, 103, 139 Reichert, 2013, Constructing, evaluating and visualizing value and utility functions for decision support, Environ Model Softw, 46, 283, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.017 Reichert, 2015, The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support, J Environ Manag, 154, 316, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.053 Schlosser JA, Haertel-Borer S, Liechti P, Reichert P (2013) Konzept für die Untersuchung und Beurteilung der Seen in der Schweiz. Anleitung zur Entwicklung und Anwendung von Beurteilungs-methoden. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern. Umwelt-Wissen nr. 1326: 38 S. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag:10780 Tversky, 1974, Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Von Winterfeldt, 1986